Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

Public outcry over proposed exclusive cruise access to The Baths & Devil’s Bay

August 16th, 2026 | Tags: National Parks Virgin Islands Spring Bay beaches
A proposal to set aside The Baths and Devil’s Bay National Parks for the exclusive use of an international luxury cruise operator on selected mornings has sparked sharp public debate in the British Virgin Islands, pitting conservation funding needs against long-standing principles of free and open beach access. Photo: Facebook
The National Parks Trust of the Virgin Islands (NPT) says it is in advanced negotiations with an unnamed cruise line to reserve access to The Baths and Devil’s Bay on nine mornings during the peak tourism season, with public access restricted from 9:00 a.m. to noon. During each reserved window, fewer than 150 cruise clients would be permitted on site, with normal public access resuming at midday. Spring Bay National Park, which had been mentioned in earlier public discussion, is not part of the arrangement and would remain open as usual. Photo: Facebook
The National Parks Trust of the Virgin Islands (NPT) says it is in advanced negotiations with an unnamed cruise line to reserve access to The Baths and Devil’s Bay on nine mornings during the peak tourism season, with public access restricted from 9:00 a.m. to noon. During each reserved window, fewer than 150 cruise clients would be permitted on site, with normal public access resuming at midday. Spring Bay National Park, which had been mentioned in earlier public discussion, is not part of the arrangement and would remain open as usual. Photo: Facebook
National Parks Trust (NPT) trustees, Shereen D. Flax-Charles and Lawrence Wheatley, have publicly distanced themselves from the proposal, saying they had 'absolutely no prior knowledge' of any plan to establish exclusive times, zones or periods of access for cruise lines or other private entities. Photo: Facebook/File
National Parks Trust (NPT) trustees, Shereen D. Flax-Charles and Lawrence Wheatley, have publicly distanced themselves from the proposal, saying they had 'absolutely no prior knowledge' of any plan to establish exclusive times, zones or periods of access for cruise lines or other private entities. Photo: Facebook/File
Alongside the exclusive-access talks, the National Parks Trust has requested a phased increase in ordinary visitor entrance fees for The Baths and Devil's Bay, from US$3 to US$10 starting November 1, 2026, and then to US$20 from April 1, 2027. Photo: BVITB/File
Alongside the exclusive-access talks, the National Parks Trust has requested a phased increase in ordinary visitor entrance fees for The Baths and Devil's Bay, from US$3 to US$10 starting November 1, 2026, and then to US$20 from April 1, 2027. Photo: BVITB/File
VALLEY, Virgin Gorda, VI — A proposal to set aside The Baths and Devil’s Bay National Parks for the exclusive use of an international luxury cruise operator on selected mornings has sparked sharp public debate in the Virgin Islands, pitting conservation funding needs against long-standing principles of free and open beach access.

The National Parks Trust of the Virgin Islands (NPT) said it is in advanced negotiations with an unnamed cruise line to reserve access to The Baths and Devil’s Bay on nine mornings during the peak tourism season, with public access restricted from 9:00 AM to noon. During each reserved window, fewer than 150 cruise clients would be permitted on site, with normal public access resuming at midday. Spring Bay National Park, which had been mentioned in earlier public discussion, is not part of the arrangement and would remain open as usual.

The Trust described the measure as part of a wider carrying-capacity framework designed to reduce pressure on the Greater Baths National Park and generate revenue for conservation, maintenance, additional rangers, and other operational costs.

Legal & constitutional concerns

At the heart of the pushback is the long-established principle that beaches throughout the Virgin Islands are open and accessible to VIslanders at all times. Critics argue that converting sections of two National Parks and their beaches into private spaces, even temporarily, conflicts with that principle and could raise constitutional questions under the Virgin Islands Constitution Order 2007, which contains protections against discrimination.

Two NPT trustees, Shereen D. Flax-Charles and Lawrence Wheatley, have publicly distanced themselves from the proposal, saying they had “absolutely no prior knowledge” of any plan to establish exclusive times, zones or periods of access for cruise lines or other private entities. They stressed that while trustees are not responsible for day-to-day operational decisions—which fall to the Board of Directors and management—they do not support excluding the general public for the exclusive benefit of a private company.

“No amount of money should transform a National Park into a private playground for a select few,” Flax-Charles and Wheatley said, describing the parks and beaches as part of the Territory’s national patrimony that should not be access-controlled by economic standing. 

Economic and livelihood worries

Beyond legal and philosophical objections, the trustees warned of knock-on effects for local tourism businesses. They questioned how the arrangement would affect charter operators, taxi drivers, tour companies, hotels, villas, restaurants, and others who depend on reliable visitor access to The Baths during peak season.

“What do we tell the local charter operator who has already accepted a booking? What do we tell the taxi driver whose livelihood depends upon taking visitors to The Baths?” they asked, suggesting that alternative funding models—such as higher ordinary visitor fees and direct contributions from major tourism companies to conservation and infrastructure—would be preferable to selling periods of exclusive access.

Trust defends plan amid funding pressures

The NPT, however, said the proposal is a necessary response to surging visitor numbers and rising conservation costs. It reported that the Virgin Islands received 612,263 visitors in the first quarter of 2026, up about 24 per cent from the same period in 2025, with cruise passengers accounting for 493,397 of those arrivals.

Operating the National Parks system costs more than US$3 million annually, the Trust said, while the Government’s subvention covers only 28 per cent; the remaining 72 per cent must be generated through entrance fees and other park-related revenue. With 19 of the Territory’s 22 National Parks generating no income, revenue-producing sites like The Baths and Devil’s Bay help finance the wider system.

The Trust maintains that every dollar from the exclusive arrangement would go to park operations and conservation, and that there would be no sale, lease, or transfer of any interest in the parks. It also said Virgin Islanders and residents, who currently enter The Baths free with valid identification, would continue to do so—though access would still be unavailable to the general public during the nine reserved morning periods.

Fee increases on the horizon

Alongside the exclusive-access talks, the Trust has requested a phased increase in ordinary visitor entrance fees: from US$3 to US$10 starting November 1, 2026, and then to US$20 from April 1, 2027. Cabinet has reportedly approved the increases, but they have not yet been gazetted. 

Public meeting scheduled

Acknowledging that the public learned about the proposal before it was formally explained, the Board admitted the sequence was “the wrong order” and promised to publish the nine proposed dates and other key terms if an agreement is signed. A virtual public meeting is scheduled for August 27, 2026, from 6:30 PM to 8:00 PM, when the Trust is expected to outline the proposal and hear directly from the community.

63 Responses to “Public outcry over proposed exclusive cruise access to The Baths & Devil’s Bay”

  • guy hill (16/08/2026, 07:33) Like (53) Dislike (1) Reply
    "At the heart of the pushback is the long-established principle that beaches throughout the Virgin Islands are open and accessible to VIslanders at all times."

    DO NOT COMPROMISE OUR FREEDOM OF MOVEMENTS FOR A FEW DOLLARS PLEASE AT NO TIME.
    • who?? (16/08/2026, 16:41) Like (8) Dislike (2) Reply
      Who is in charge of National parks and Trusts. No mention of any one other than 2 members who deny any knowledge. hmmmmm.
      • TruDat! (17/08/2026, 07:13) Like (3) Dislike (2) Reply
        https://bvitrustees.org/trustees.html

        You can draw your own conclusions.
  • Roger Burnett (16/08/2026, 08:14) Like (35) Dislike (1) Reply
    Therein lies the problem when the idyllic for the few becomes a raucous playground for the masses.

    Fifty years ago, Virgin Island poet Sheila Hyndman (1958- 1991) prophesied:

    They will come with tools and machines.
    They will bring to light your secret places,
    They will demand your mysteries.
    They will destroy, build up.
    They will dilute your treasures,
    And rob you of your chastity.
    They will adorn you like ancient Jezebel,
    ‘Til all that’s left of your true self,
    Will be an old and forgotten poem,
    Like mine.

    My video "Sheila Hyndman Remembered" serves as a introduction to her life and work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUb3nI3Nnkg
  • What? (16/08/2026, 08:16) Like (34) Dislike (0) Reply
    How much is NPT gonna get paid for these 9 x mornings? While it might seem tempting philosophically it's wrong.

    Jacking up the price to $20 to enter The Baths is steep. I say no to this.

    Can I go to the beach at Oil Nut Bay?
    • TruDat! (17/08/2026, 07:16) Like (14) Dislike (0) Reply
      There should be a "local price" and it should be no more than 1/2 what we charge tourists.

      In response to your other question "No, the main resort beach and the Oil Nut Bay Beach Club are private and reserved exclusively for resort guests and homeowners." The precedent is already set and the locals are excluded from the beach there . Jamaica here we come.
      • Real (17/08/2026, 09:55) Like (5) Dislike (0) Reply
        THE HELL YOU PAYING TO GO TO THE BEACH IS NEXT LEVEL EVIL
      • @trudat (18/08/2026, 08:58) Like (5) Dislike (0) Reply
        Restricting access to the Oil Nut Bay Beach is illegal. ILLEGAL!!! Have you ever heard of a Lawsuit?
  • VG Resident (16/08/2026, 08:24) Like (15) Dislike (2) Reply
    I, for one, would not spend $20 to visit the b baths, and I suspect that is true for many folks. So local folks would be charged $20 to visit the baths. How many local folks would do that?
  • cap (16/08/2026, 09:09) Like (21) Dislike (1) Reply
    Public access to beaches? Apparently that doesn’t apply any more as long as there’s money involved.
  • Well (16/08/2026, 09:19) Like (51) Dislike (3) Reply
    We spend millions on concerts, and we can't fund the National Parks Trust so it can remain free of influence from outside entities. Natalio is something else.
    • @ Well (16/08/2026, 11:32) Like (1) Dislike (35) Reply
      Stop your politics we need the funds
      • Sans Limite. (17/08/2026, 01:52) Like (8) Dislike (0) Reply
        Who is We? You know what comes after WE? Go figure.
      • @ @Well (18/08/2026, 09:01) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
        You need the funds we need your freedom. This is not Jamica. This is Our Natural Resources not yours!
    • GT (17/08/2026, 09:52) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
      If you have 500,000 people coming in on the cruise ships charge him an extra $5to $10 each when they come into the port. that can be applied to the conservation fund instead of increasing the $3fee for Parks to $20 fees for the locals?
  • No Just No (16/08/2026, 10:04) Like (36) Dislike (1) Reply
    Who ever came up with this idea needs to lose their job. This goes is just abhorrent and against the principals of this country. Public Access for locals should never ever be inhibited. The opposite, limiting cruise passengers for access is the far far better alternative. This is quite frankly ridiculous and should not even be discussed. Our history is us literally fighting against this.
  • Wellsah (16/08/2026, 10:24) Like (32) Dislike (2) Reply
    cruise industry is like a parasite, what more do you want???? each major line already have their own "private island" destination. Do not give exclusive access to these parasites
  • In the morning only. Yes.. (16/08/2026, 10:25) Like (13) Dislike (26) Reply
    From when to when ? From 7am to 11am. Monday to Friday only. Not Saturdays & Sundays. The weekends are open for all visitors all day. .I am for that...The Park needs funds for it up keep and safety measures..If this deal will bring those funds to the national park capus, those funds may do a lot more more upgrading and maintaining of a lot more Parks...
    • No (16/08/2026, 11:42) Like (36) Dislike (1) Reply
      No compromise, read between the lines. If you give a cruise nine dates now they’re going to ask for more and eventually get full exclusive access. Every other Caribbean country that has done this sort of thing fully regrets it. It’s never good. Beaches belong to the local public 24/7 365 NO EXCEPTIONS.
    • @ in the mornings only. Yes. (16/08/2026, 18:41) Like (26) Dislike (11) Reply
      Not a bad suggestion / còmpromise half day only Monday to Friday 6am to 12 noon only. .Afternoons, Weekends and holidaays not included in the deals, I too think this is workable and worth a try.
    • Norris Turnbull (17/08/2026, 01:51) Like (10) Dislike (4) Reply
      @ In the morning only... NO time
  • @cap (16/08/2026, 11:15) Like (37) Dislike (1) Reply
    Here we go again, our govt. looking out for themselves personally. After all, we see VG is in demand, but what are we getting in return? Nothing, all this money being spent on VG & going Tortola to finance a bunch of bull. Not fair at all.
  • Beaches (16/08/2026, 11:19) Like (32) Dislike (7) Reply
    Beaches are public spaces…periodt. These white people drained pols when blacks swim in them…even today, if a black person is at the pool where they live, the cops are called. One time when visiting the BATHS, there was a set of people in the water, we got in, they came out, we came out and they got in, so we got back in and stayed in and they left, they want exclusive access, I don’t care if there are black and brown people on cruises, let them not spread their racists disease and diabolical hate the HELL away from here, selling out ourselves for a few trinkets… come on we are BETTER than this
    • same thing (16/08/2026, 21:26) Like (14) Dislike (1) Reply
      Same thing happened to me and my family we went in they came and they left. That also happened at the bubbling pool in Jost Van Dyke .These pink parasites believe they are entiled to everything and anything anywhere , and anytime they really need to move to another planet ... l suggest Mercury
  • (16/08/2026, 11:31) Like (3) Dislike (32) Reply
    Much to do about nothing we need the funds
    • next (16/08/2026, 15:12) Like (31) Dislike (2) Reply
      The cruise ships will want ONLY CRUISE PASSENGERS at Cane Garden Bay. NO LOCALS ALLOWED. You give these corrupt companies an inch and they take a mile.
    • @… (16/08/2026, 20:55) Like (10) Dislike (1) Reply
      ALL FUNDS/MONEY IS NOT ALWAYS GOOD FUNDS OR MONEY.
  • VG (16/08/2026, 11:51) Like (15) Dislike (0) Reply
    What the tell is this? We the people of VG don't have a say in this no Word from Vincent, no this cant be. What about day tripers,Private boat charters, villas hotels localst.
  • Then the next thing you know (16/08/2026, 12:21) Like (20) Dislike (0) Reply
    Is the locals is ban from the baths and turtle bay like Jamaica where the locals is ban from the beaches.
  • WHAT!!! (16/08/2026, 12:28) Like (28) Dislike (2) Reply
    NO WAY should people living here , belonger or not, be prevented from going to the Baths any time they want.
  • John (16/08/2026, 12:43) Like (9) Dislike (38) Reply
    Once them flax girls involved there will be confusion
    • Marty Probasco (16/08/2026, 13:57) Like (4) Dislike (1) Reply

      @John . You found real stupid... Confusion where? Some of you are full of s***.

  • bob marley (16/08/2026, 13:06) Like (15) Dislike (0) Reply
    "You give them an inch, they take a yard." Little by little the VI will be reduced to nothing for the youths to look foward to. What a shame!
  • HMMM (16/08/2026, 13:13) Like (29) Dislike (0) Reply
    If this gets approved not one person in the current government shoud get reelected. Vote them out and make our voices heard
  • Judy (16/08/2026, 13:42) Like (6) Dislike (0) Reply
    have a serious conversation with your political party because some group had to give them authorisation
  • Lawd (16/08/2026, 13:53) Like (6) Dislike (1) Reply
    Let’s make this about the Flax girls and not pay attention to the real issues.
  • east end lady (16/08/2026, 14:10) Like (23) Dislike (0) Reply
    charge cruise ship passengers more by all means, but don't make exclusive.
  • BRAD BOYNES (16/08/2026, 14:16) Like (30) Dislike (0) Reply
    Our freedom of movement is bigger than money. This is 2026.. We ought to be better than this.. You cannot have outside entities thinking what's best for us as a country ever. DO NOT DO THIS. We will get in the streets
  • Belac (16/08/2026, 14:26) Like (25) Dislike (1) Reply
    Sooooo i the same vein, the govt doesn't fully fund the hospital. Can they enter into an agreement with an outside entity to provide limited access on select days to visitors, restricting access to locals on said days? You know how crazy that sounds, right?
  • WEW (16/08/2026, 15:15) Like (24) Dislike (1) Reply
    I can't see why cruise ships are welcome. The classless passengers don't spend any money here, if they had it they wouldn't be on a ship but a nice hillside villa. What happened to hauling them to the "refurbished again" Brandywine Bay ? Watch them turn pink then waddle back to a safari bus
  • Start (16/08/2026, 15:19) Like (20) Dislike (2) Reply
    It's the beginning of apartheid. It's always the so-called most black conscience that allows this nonsense.
    • me again (18/08/2026, 07:19) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
      It’s Modern day SLAVERY — the same tactics as in the old days — have black ppl fighting against each other —cutting prices below operating costs —So many SMALL businesses folding and the BIG companies taking over — we ( black ppl ) will be prisoners in OUR land —
  • A F*NG crying shame (16/08/2026, 15:55) Like (11) Dislike (0) Reply

    The baths is an iconic spot and now they are trying to ruin it. Whoever is behind this needs some good hard s***$ and k***s

  • my two cents (16/08/2026, 17:37) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    Just too much politics to hell with the exception
  • jamaica (16/08/2026, 19:48) Like (14) Dislike (1) Reply
    The luxury line is most likely SeaDream Yacht Club. Its own site lists a Baths shore excursion across roughly 15 sailings from Nov 2026 through early 2027, flagged “ADDITIONAL CAPACITY.” More telling: SeaDream says it generally arrives early and anchors off Spanish Town so guests get an early start at The Baths before the tourists arrive. That is precisely the 9am–noon product the Trust is negotiating. The line also markets itself on private harbours and secluded beaches that larger ships can’t reach. Ships carry 112 guests but two, and they sometimes overlap in the BVI, which could reach ~150 with staff.

    Four Seasons Yachts maybe. BVI appears on its 2026 Caribbean itineraries, including a Peter Island call in December 2026. 95 suites. Fits the luxury profile, but no Virgin Gorda-specific call.

    Ritz-Carlton Yacht Collection not likely. Ilma sails 20+ Caribbean itineraries Nov 2026–April 2027, with The Baths featured on multiple San Juan round trips. But Ilma carries up to 448 guests.

    Other possibilities: Silversea: ultra-luxury (Royal Caribbean Group), Seabourn: ultra-luxury (Carnival Corp), Ponant: luxury expedition, French owned

    This reminds me of how Jamaica sold out its citizens and made most beaches private

  • one eye rooster (16/08/2026, 21:38) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    A wonder wa sister smokies got to say scattered and get high on bouldrrs
  • UK (17/08/2026, 00:16) Like (1) Dislike (12) Reply
    So many racist comments here. Yet another reason for direct rule and take away their UK passports too
    • Karnage (17/08/2026, 10:04) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
      Hush your mouth before we have our own Windrush.
    • Roadtownrebel (17/08/2026, 11:17) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
      @ UK.. Maybe there is some deep guild resting on your conscience. You can keep your direct rule and your passports shove them up your a$$ and make yourself a popsicle.
  • Chuck (17/08/2026, 01:56) Like (6) Dislike (1) Reply
    This is a Crock of CaCa
  • BuzzBvi (17/08/2026, 06:27) Like (8) Dislike (1) Reply
    And what are you telling the other cruise ships who now cant go to the baths!!!

    Ha ha. What a load of nonsense.

    Be better if we proposing banning of the ships on these days we go a step further, follow NPTs idea and ban all cruise ships access.

    Promoting that if people want to go to the baths they book a vacation here and then some money will flow into the VI economy instead of the Cruise ships constant drain on resources while one family gets rich.

    The baths would also be a pleasant place to visit again.

  • @UK (17/08/2026, 06:45) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
    Not racist at all, apparently you don’t live here. The BVI govt is some crooks. VG has been the bread & butter of the tourism sector, butchered can’t get the necessities the residents need for normal everyday living. Constant water supply, electricity & a better infrastructure. They want to use the sister islands to make the money so they can build up Hog city.
  • @UK (17/08/2026, 06:54) Like (12) Dislike (0) Reply
    By the way keep all you passports, who is goes UK anyways? A few went there after the hurricanes, but are returning slowly. That doesn’t give all you the right to come & dirty our place & try to control. Not against people coming to visiting “ Natures Secret”but just don’t try to be spiteful.
  • Raw, unfiltered and Unvarnished (17/08/2026, 07:23) Like (18) Dislike (1) Reply
    The Virgin Islands (British) resources are an identity, inheritance, etc, for the use, enjoyment of current Virgin Islanders and Virgin Islanders yet unborn. Virgin Islanders are willing to share natural resources, historical sites, artifacts, etc., with visitors. Nonetheless, the proposal borders on Virgin Islanders disenfranchisement, economic racism/discrimination , second class citizenship, etc, being treated as a underclass in their homeland. Virgin Islanders should not stand for it. They need to peacefully protest, agitate, advocate, for their rights, etc, following the examples national heroes Theodolph Faulkner and Noel Lloyd. They need to strongly push back against this rising tide. Virgin Islanders needs to get off their asses and fight for the change they want, becoming change agents. Stop being wimps, hoping others will fight the battles for them. Stop the dependency. Let’s go .Where have Dolph Faulkner, Noel Lloyd, Christopher Fleming, etc., gone?
  • A Capitalist Who Loves the BVI (17/08/2026, 08:38) Like (11) Dislike (0) Reply
    Upon arrival, there's a $10 per person Environmental and Tourism Levy, so where's the accounting on that? In other words, why is there a need to sell access to a pristine part of the Territory given that there's already an infrastructure in place to collect money that, at least in part, is purportedly for the purpose of this new restricted access or "pay for play." Why not raise that tax a dollar or two?

    And what's the net revenue projection if this new arrangement is put into place?

    This government NEVER wants to provide numbers or even present basic mathematical assumptions to its citizens.
  • Don't be fooled! (17/08/2026, 13:29) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    Don't be fooled by the fake outrage! One sister vex because she can't sell to the luxury guests and the other sister vex that the luxury liner chose NPT instead of Oil Nut Bay!

    Then they call every news media they know to report their disdain, adding Mr. Wheatley to their mess and Mr. Wheatley ain't got a thing to do with them!

    It have much more to this story and when it hit the fan, I hope ayo keep up the same energy! Yes, I too have my concerns, but I'm not fooled by their fake outrage at all. I waiting on facts.
  • UK (17/08/2026, 13:34) Like (10) Dislike (1) Reply
    Say it again. Only direct rule will
    Work here - terrible roads, no water, no electricity. Look at other carribean islands who do it so much better. It’s embarrassing. Direct rule from London!
  • @John (17/08/2026, 13:44) Like (10) Dislike (0) Reply
    Please, don’t blame the mess on the “Flax” girls. At least they’re looking out for VG unlike those set of selfish bastards on HOA. That’s why they push out Shereen, she had a voice & those cowards don’t like when people stand up to them.
  • @Belac (17/08/2026, 16:11) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
    This govt doesn’t care about the people m, all they care about is the money it’s bringing in for them to lines their pockets & take lavish trips that do nothing for the infrastructure of the BVI.
  • Bull (17/08/2026, 22:00) Like (0) Dislike (1) Reply
    $20.00 to go to the Baths for a swim, ridiculously high give it a little while continue bleeding the tourists and see what happens.
  • @Bull (17/08/2026, 23:35) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    People from other parts of the world never came across natural Er orders like those on VG, they don’t mind paying, it’s just what the greedy selfish govt does with the money that bothers people.
  • vi (18/08/2026, 06:39) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    If it ain't broke don't try to fix it, 20 dollar per person is ridiculous all u doing is turning away guests from coming to the baths truly not fair
  • ausar (18/08/2026, 11:29) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    What is the fee structure for such a proposal?

    It better not be less than 20 million annually!!







Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.
Video Ad


Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.