August Monday Parade to shift to Saturday- Hon Hodge-Smith
Hon Hodge-Smith made the announcement during an Emancipation Festival forum on Friday, February 27, 2026.
Parade shift
The Minister stated that the Emancipation Festival Parade 2026 will shift from August Monday to the following Saturday.
She defended this decision by stating, "Festival evolves, we have the rise and shine tramp on August Monday, and we have seen where the revelers are taking a lot of time, and they want to stay on the streets. We start a little late, and this is impacting our parade."
Parade determines success of festival
Smith added that the success of the parade is a key factor in determining whether the festival was successful or not.
"So we are going to change the parade date, from the August Monday, because we cannot change the tramp from August Monday because of the significance of it."
Hon Hodge-Smith said organisers depend heavily on the same revellers who are in the tramp to be in the parade, to get the parade started at a reasonable time.
"And I want you to understand that, yes, we are celebrating our emancipation festival, but it is also part of our tourism product."
Improve festival as a tourism product
Smith urged Virgin Islanders to support this new idea, stating, "We're going to try with the idea, and we have already made that decision, and we want your blessings, that we're going to have the parade culminate our festival activities this year by ending on the Saturday after August Monday."
This change, she explained, aims to attract more visitors and enhance the festival as a tourism product.
It was during Virgin Islands Voice, which aired on Facebook on Wednesday, August 13, 2025, that Hon Hodge-Smith first stated that Rise and Shine Tramp and the Festival Parade could no longer be held on the same day.
“We need to come to some kind of negotiation and agreement. My perspective is that the Rise and Shine Tramp should not be removed, as it symbolises when the people took to the streets, jubilant upon hearing the news of our freedom. Along with the torchlight procession, there may be some differences, but the tramp also represents when the people celebrated their freedom.
“We need to decide whether to move the parade and where it would be relocated. I know there will be differing opinions, but I hope that when we have this discussion, we can bring it to the people for a final decision,” Hon Hodge-Smith had stated.
2.png)
.jpg)
Follow Us On
55 Responses to “August Monday Parade to shift to Saturday- Hon Hodge-Smith”
This say's it all: from celebrations to the environment. The cruise ship dollar comes before all else.
I for one will not keep a troupe. Some people fro. Overseas join the troupe to enjoy themselves and leave by August Wednesday to go back to their jobs. Members in my troupe also take time after Carrot Bay Thursday to go away and relax. The lawmakers always make a muck
Change is inevitable. Why are our people so afraid of change? The world is changing before our very eyes, and it is in our best interest to be ready for these life altering changes.
The only failures are those that are not acted upon because of cowardly proclivity.
I am sure this idea was presented based on some initial research and her experience in this space over her many years. This lady has been in this cultural space for quite some time and should be given the opportunity to try something new.
"We cannot continue to do the same things year in and year our expecting different results."
Can both the cultural and economic stakeholders on this issue, present objective perspectives on this idea?
International Virgin Islands Scholars would also like to contribute and present their arguments on this topic.
Thank you.
I concur-
"We cannot continue to do the same things year in and year out expecting different results."
It's time for us as a collective to take a bold stand locally and internationally and stop the hemorraging of Our Virgin Islands before it's all gone.
According to the article, the Junior Minister for Culture and Tourism stated that the parade will now conclude Emancipation festival activities on the Saturday after August Monday . That single sentence carries enormous weight. The August Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday observances are not arbitrary dates on a government calendar. They are the living continuation of the Proclamation of 1834, when slavery was abolished in the British Virgin Islands under the Slavery Abolition Act of the British Parliament.
On August 1, 1834, emancipation was formally proclaimed throughout the British Caribbean. In the Virgin Islands, that proclamation signaled the legal end of centuries of enslavement of African people whose labor built the very foundations of this Territory. These three days in early August are not merely festival days. They are ritual remembrance. They are historical reckoning. They are public acknowledgment that freedom here was not granted out of benevolence, but wrested from a brutal system engineered by empire.
To compress, relocate, or restructure this commemoration primarily because of economic complaints is to misunderstand its purpose.
We are told businesses experience financial strain. We are told there are wage costs. We are told government revenue pauses for three days. But emancipation was never designed to maximize quarterly profits. It was designed to mark the rupture of a moral crime.
The irony is difficult to ignore. The same imperial structure that placed our ancestors in chains determined the terms of their emancipation. Now, generations later, descendants of that same colonial governance model continue to exercise final authority over how we remember that emancipation. The symbolism matters. When decisions of this magnitude are made without broad public engagement, it feels less like representation and more like management.
Even more troubling is the framing. The change was presented as an administrative improvement, as though this restructuring emerged organically from a cultural vision. Yet public reporting and commentary make clear that pressure from segments of the business community has been central to the push. A handful of economically powerful voices express inconvenience, and suddenly a 190-year tradition becomes negotiable.
That is not democracy. That is influence.
The argument that three days of closure harms revenue ignores the counterargument that cultural identity has economic value. The August Festival is the single largest cultural tourism event in the Territory. Its authenticity is precisely what gives it strength. Diluting its historical structure to accommodate convenience risks hollowing out the very brand the Territory promotes.
And let us be honest: emancipation observances are not equivalent to other public holidays. Even the 2020 committee reportedly noted that emancipation days should be “carefully carved out” because of their historical significance. That caveat alone acknowledges that these days are not interchangeable commodities on a fiscal spreadsheet.
This is not about resistance to change for its own sake. Societies evolve. Schedules adjust. But major cultural shifts require transparent consultation. Public forums. Legislative debate. Engagement with historians, clergy, educators, and community elders. The people must be part of decisions about the meaning of their own freedom.
When emancipation is reframed primarily as a scheduling inconvenience, something sacred erodes.
Freedom was not convenient in 1834. It was disruptive. It upended an economic system built on human bondage. It cost slave owners compensation from the British government, while the formerly enslaved received nothing but a fragile legal status and years of “apprenticeship” exploitation. If economic inconvenience is now the threshold for altering emancipation observances, we risk prioritizing commerce over conscience.
I do not support this change.
At minimum, it should be paused and subjected to full public consultation. Ideally, it should be reversed. If the decision stands without broad consensus, residents have every democratic right to express opposition through civic action, including organized boycotts of the altered events. Cultural heritage belongs to the people, not to a narrow coalition of economic stakeholders.
Emancipation is not a product. It is memory.
And memory should never be rearranged quietly.
https://bvinews.com/local-businesses-frustrated-by-frequent-holidays-in-bvi/#:~:text=in%20All%20News%20/%20By:%20BVI,doors%20or%20scale%20down%20operations.
The decision to restructure the Emancipation Festival and shift the August Monday Parade to the Saturday after August Monday is not just a scheduling tweak. It is a governance issue. And under every modern sustainable development framework the Territory claims to align with, governance must be participatory.
**SDG 16.7** calls for “responsive, inclusive, participatory and representative decision-making at all levels.” That is not decorative wording. It is a measurable global commitment. If we are invoking sustainable development in national policy, then major cultural decisions cannot be shaped by a handful of business stakeholders behind closed doors and then presented as a finished product.
Sustainable development is not code for “economic optimization.” It rests on three pillars: economic, social, and cultural integrity. When economic convenience overrides cultural continuity, the balance collapses.
Then there is **SDG 11.4**, which explicitly calls for strengthening efforts to safeguard cultural heritage. Emancipation is not a festival in the shallow sense. It is living historical memory tied directly to the 1834 Proclamation that ended slavery in these islands. Those three August days are not interchangeable commercial downtime. They are ritualized remembrance of a people emerging from bondage under colonial rule.
To move core observances primarily in response to business pressure risks treating heritage as flexible inventory rather than inherited identity.
The BVI’s own **Vision 2036 National Sustainable Development Plan** states that it is built on broad-based public consultations and the voices of the people. It emphasizes transparency and accountability in decision-making. If that is the Territory’s official development philosophy, then where was the consultation? Where were the town halls? Where were the public cultural forums before altering a nearly two-century-old structure?
If development is truly people-centered, then the people must be centered.
Even more pointed is the **Virgin Islands Culture & Heritage Policy (2023)**, which warns that cultural tourism must not negatively affect the integrity and authenticity of Virgin Islands identity. If the justification for this change leans heavily on easing business operations or improving the “product,” then the policy itself cautions against exactly that dynamic.
Authenticity cannot be sacrificed on the altar of convenience.
What makes this especially unsettling is the historical echo. The original system that enslaved our ancestors was engineered for economic efficiency. Human life was secondary to profit margins. Now, nearly two centuries after emancipation, we are being told that a three-day commemoration is too economically inconvenient. The symbolism writes itself.
And when officials present the change as a progressive improvement while it appears driven by pressure from segments of the business elite, it reinforces a familiar pattern: decisions shaped at the top, justified as necessary, and handed down to the public as inevitability.
That is not participatory governance. That is managerial governance.
If sustainable development means anything, it must mean that cultural identity is not negotiable without consent. It must mean that emancipation is not treated as a scheduling problem to be streamlined.
This is not resistance to modernization. It is resistance to erasing the meaning embedded in time and tradition.
If this decision stands without genuine public consultation, it undermines the very governance principles the Territory claims to uphold under Vision 2036 and the SDGs. The appropriate course is clear:
Pause the implementation.
Engage the public formally.
Consult historians, cultural leaders, churches, youth, elders, and community groups.
And if the majority rejects the change, restore the traditional structure.
Sustainable development is not about maximizing revenue days. It is about sustaining dignity.
Emancipation is not a product to be rebranded. It is a covenant with our history.
As a participant in the Parade for nearly 40 years, this is the most dumbest thing I heard. Why not put the Parade the Saturday before August Monday or put the Jouvert on the Saturday. What happen to the Tuesday that have nothing for years? Yes the Jouvert should be moved from same day as the Parade but you need to be mindful of the date chosen. You talk about sister Islands been able to attend the parade, last I check we all have the same holidays. Then you talk about tourism product, who staying here additional days for a Parade. Which other country you all see does change their events for us to attend. What happens now to Carrot Bay Saturday events? It's always the people who don't attend anything or participate that have the most to contribute for decisions to be made. What culture you all talking about? What tourism product? The one you now trying advertise at the last hour as usual? This is our festival and you the government tend to bend over backwards to please people except the residents of this Territory. It's sickening now mehn.
Keep the Parade on August Monday and rise and shine on Tuesday.
To DropNews 1&2
I truly appreciate your thoughtful perspective on the issue. In particular, emphasizing the fact that- "It is a fundamental change to one of the most 'sacred' commemorations in the Virgin Islands. And it was made without meaningful public consultation."
Certain dynamics of our culture and traditions do hold sacred spiritual bonds, that of the past, present, and future. And the economic component alone should not have us lose sight of that.
Those sacred and spiritual connections do contribute in reminding us and in sustaining who we are as a people. I do hope the powers to be take notes and act upon your suggestions.
DropNews, 'thank you' for shedding more light on the subject. Good read.
Why not throw options on the table, to strike a balance. Why not explore parade being on the Tuesday seeing that there's no more horse race or Tuesday Jouvert; filling that little void.
The participation might be low on the Saturday because visitors wil have travelled back, as well as most people usually goes back to work from the Thursday.
That Saturday is also a normal working day which will interrupt businesses in the Road Town area.
What Gad Fly Stung Luce Hodge-Smith and her political gang. You do not thriffle with History.
I have for the past years,had homecoming away from home here in these VI to visit family elsewhere who no longer enjoy the content of the August Monday festivities due to the nastiness of the imported nasties.
WHEN CELEBRATING YOUR FREEDOM BECOME A TOURISM PRODUCT YOU ARE STILL ON THE PLANTATION. THIS CELEBRATION WAS HERE BEFORE TOURISM.. Think Luce it's not illegal yet.
You went from doing nothing to doing wayyyyy toooo much!
There are 3 holidays allocated to our Emancipation. As for now, there is no event on the Tuesday. Was this day considered to have either the Parade or Jouvert to keep both events during the Emancipation Holidays. The Saturday just seems like a gap from the holidays and considering all other aspects of having it on that day.