Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

VINO Editorial in response to BVI Beacon article on Free Speech

Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) continues to be and is perhaps the only credible media house that has been consistent in this Territory for the past 10 years on the issue of freedom of speech. Photo: VINO
The front page editorial by BVI Beacon slamming the Misuse & Cybercrime (Amendment) Act of 2019 as an attack on Press Freedom in the Virgin Islands. Photo: Team of Reporters
The front page editorial by BVI Beacon slamming the Misuse & Cybercrime (Amendment) Act of 2019 as an attack on Press Freedom in the Virgin Islands. Photo: Team of Reporters
VINO finds it somewhat curious and to some extent hypocritical that the BVI Beacon’s Editor, Mr Freeman Rogers, is now circulating an Email to media practitioners claiming that 'free speech is being threatened by the Computer Misuse & Cybercrime (amendment) Act 2019'. Photo: VINO
VINO finds it somewhat curious and to some extent hypocritical that the BVI Beacon’s Editor, Mr Freeman Rogers, is now circulating an Email to media practitioners claiming that 'free speech is being threatened by the Computer Misuse & Cybercrime (amendment) Act 2019'. Photo: VINO
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI- Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) continues to be and is perhaps the only credible media house that has been consistent in this Territory for the past 10 years on the issue of freedom of speech, as we pride ourselves on providing accurate and ‘inside information’ that hit at the core of issues affecting the Territory.

We find it somewhat curious and to some extent hypocritical, however, that the BVI Beacon’s Editor Freeman Rogers, is now circulating an Email to media practitioners claiming that “free speech is being threatened by the Cybercrime amendment” Act.

For the past 10 years and in particular the past eight (8) years under the National Democratic Party (NDP), VINO has been in the wilderness holding the government to account on the issues of free speech and the ability of the press to have access to relevant public information, including the need for a Freedom of Information Bill.

VINO always campaigned for free speech

Many residents will recall that it was VINO that took the lead, when the first Computer Misuse and Cybercrime Act was passed in March 2014 where we warned about the deliberate attempt to severely restrict freedom of the press by the then NDP Regime. At that time, we received little or no support from other media houses including the same BVI Beacon, outside of one or two articles.

When VINO for the past 8 to 10 years was calling for accountability and transparency and doing real investigative journalism, the BVI Beacon found it convenient to go after VINO’s esteemed founder, Honourable Julian Willock.

It now appears to us as hypocritical and lacking credibility that the BVI Beacon is positioning itself, as the new voice to protect free speech in the Virgin Islands (VI). In its front-page editorial entitled “Freedom of speech under attack in VI”, they would have one believe that the sky is falling after the Governor's assent to the Computer Misuse and Cybercrime Act 2019.

While we agree that there are two (2) problematic areas in the Act, where one section levies a fine of up to $500,000 and the other being prison time of up to 14 years for using a computer to send a message that is “grossly offensive or has menacing character” or that is sent “for the purpose of causing annoyance or inconvenience”, we call on the current Administration to further clarify and explain these provisions.

Did BVI Beacon turn its back on the local media?

But where was the BVI Beacon when a former legislator spent 8 years (2011 to 2019) in the Third House of Assembly using his protection in the House, under immunity from a lawsuit, to lambast the media and in particular VINO?

The BVI Beacon did not write an editorial in defense of the media then, therefore, one should seek answers to why not. In addition, when two (2) former legislators were suing the press over accurate and public information, where were Freeman Rogers and the BVI Beacon to be a voice in protecting and advocating for the rights of a free press?

Instead, it seemingly turned its back on the media and, in fact, wrote many articles, which some described as malicious and unfairly criticising the press, in particular VINO. 

As recent as last year, the Beacon in an article attacked the Speaker of the House, questioning his role in VINO and casting aspersions on his good name and high integrity, despite public information that clearly confirmed that since becoming Speaker in 2019 his role became limited to revenue and advertising.

Many have claimed that the same article was racist and disingenuous; however, the cries of racism were not endorsed by VINO or its parent company Advance Marketing and Professional Services, as the label could be a divisive tool to distract from legitimate issues.  It would also be unethical and inaccurate to label the entire BVI Beacon’s team as such without empirical evidence.

No moral high ground

Our point is, at this time, our media house cannot support the BVI Beacon in its efforts of advocacy, both in Mr. Rogers’ Email of February 16, 2020 and his front-page editorial of Thursday, February 20, 2020.  

In our estimation, the BVI Beacon and its editor lack the moral authority to lead such a charge, as they are guilty of attacking the local media and in particular VINO and its founder. 

We, therefore, call on someone else in the media fraternity with the moral high ground and integrity to open a dialogue with the Honourable Andrew A. Fahie’s Administration about the legitimate concerns raised, both locally and regionally, in the Computer Misuse and Cybercrime Act 2019.

VINO will continue to hold governments accountable and will advocate for free speech like we always have.

16 Responses to “VINO Editorial in response to BVI Beacon article on Free Speech”

  • GG (25/02/2020, 11:48) Like (40) Dislike (6) Reply
    Is this an editorial, or an attack on the Beacon?
    If the Beacon does not have the "moral authority" and VINO does, then VINO take up the mantle; don't attack the Beacon. Two wrongs don't make a right, as they say.
  • Nice (25/02/2020, 12:50) Like (6) Dislike (19) Reply
    I love this article. The Beacon are hypocrites
  • Ting start (25/02/2020, 12:52) Like (5) Dislike (1) Reply
    Wow Dude do you realize what has been conveyed in this article...you took off your clothes in public.
  • Pressing matters (25/02/2020, 13:23) Like (5) Dislike (17) Reply
    VINO i support you on this. You were always getting the info no one else dared to report on. You have given everyone a voice in this BVI, through your articles, commentaries and varying coverage.
  • watching (25/02/2020, 13:24) Like (2) Dislike (4) Reply
    A newsite did indeed make it their duty to smear the name of VINO founder. What that newsite fails to recognise is that we well know who is the one calling the shots. They can't fool people that they not biased...they are very
  • neutral (25/02/2020, 13:25) Like (10) Dislike (1) Reply
    media houses should band together but these two like cat and dog!
    • one eye (25/02/2020, 15:25) Like (3) Dislike (19) Reply
      be careful with them right wing reporters from the Beacon this is not trump country
  • Hmm (25/02/2020, 13:32) Like (7) Dislike (4) Reply
    but its true that Beacon never came to the support of the other news sites when they were sued! Fact
  • Hog Tail (25/02/2020, 14:20) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply

    These w88888 goonies runs america please dont let this happen in our little country

  • @neutral (25/02/2020, 14:27) Like (0) Dislike (1) Reply
    One is NDP and the other is VIP a set a jokers them is.
  • facts (25/02/2020, 14:55) Like (3) Dislike (4) Reply
    Beacon full of horse drippings
  • rattie (25/02/2020, 15:26) Like (6) Dislike (11) Reply
    One thing I Love about VINO they are Fairless and Speaker of the truth always
  • Really (25/02/2020, 19:05) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    sounds like its VINO vs Beacon... it can't get hotter than this.
  • lodger (25/02/2020, 20:10) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    All the media lobbied together against clauses in this bill. Even the governor doesnt really like it. So its no time to try and draw points. Stay together.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.