Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 or Email ALL news; ads call 1-284-440-6666

No limousines for Mapp & Potter!

There will be no limousines as Emergency Vehicles for USVI Governor Kenneth E. Mapp (left) and Osbert E. Potter (right). Photo: VIC

CHARLOTTE AMALIE, St Thomas, USVI — “I move for the override of Section 3 of Act. No. 7866, vetoed by the governor, so move.”

Those were the words of Senator Janette Millin Young on Monday May 9, 2016, who, as promised, moved to override US Virgin Islands' Governor Kenneth E. Mapp’s line-item veto of a section of the Emergency Vehicles bill that sought to block the executive branch from purchasing “ceremonial vehicles” for the Office of the Governor and Office of the Lieutenant Governor.

Mr. Mapp, in August of last year, had requested some $350,000 be part of the bill to purchase emergency vehicles for the territory’s first responder units, arguing that the current fleet of ceremonial vehicles was old, and repair costs were on the rise.

“The governor’s official vehicles were purchased back in 2005; they are in constant need of repair and are an embarrassment to the territory,” Mr. Mapp said in August, 2015. “During my inauguration on January 5, my official vehicle collapsed at Emancipation Garden and I had to be transported to the next inaugural event via police transport. I suppose this was symbolic of the state of the government I was inheriting. Currently the lieutenant governor travels via police vehicles because he has no functioning official vehicle.”

Included in the executive branch’s budget were three new limousines costing $120,000 in total, according to Nelly Varlack, director of business and administration during testimony in August 2015. One limousine would be on St. Croix and another here for the governor, and one for the Lieutenant Governor Osbert E. Potter. Ms. Varlack did not specify on which island Potter’s limousine would be stationed.

The override was the first item on the floor at an ongoing Senate session at the Earl B. Ottley Legislative Hall on May 9, 2016, where senators were working on a myriad of measures.

Most senators support override

And while most senators supported the override — including Kurt Vialet, Tregenza Roach, Marvin Blyden, Jean Forde, Novelle Francis, Justin Harrigan, Myron Jackson, Neville James, Sammuel Sanes and Mrs. Millin Young —  three senators, including Kenneth Gitttens, Nereida Rivera-O’Reilly and Almando Liburd voted against blocking the governor from purchasing ceremonial vehicles. Senator Clifford Graham was recorded as absent, and Senator Positive Nelson abstained from voting.

Following the veto override, Mrs. Millin — as she did when introducing the amended to block the purchase of the ceremonial vehicles — once more explained her reason for moving to override. She relegated the governor’s explanation as to why he line-item vetoed the amendment as inconsistent, and reminded senators that the governor’s financial team, during an August 2015 hearing, clearly explained what the ceremonial vehicles were needed for. She said the governor’s notion that the amendment would effectively block all departments and agencies connected to his office and that of the lieutenant governor from purchasing vehicles was unsound.

“It is an overreach to say that should this section be contained in the overall Act, he won’t be able to order, for example, a firetruck or a police car,” Mrs. Millin Young said, referring to the governor. Now that we have reinstated this section, the governor, the Police Department and the Fire Department — they can all order cars. Even the governor and the lieutenant governor can order cars, which I understand are already on order from some people. However, they cannot be ceremonial-type cars,” she added.

The senators would later offer an amendment to remove the word “official” from the amendment. “I don’t want any of us giving the impression that we don’t want official vehicles to be purchased because some of us do. At least I do,” Mr. James said.

“This would clarify the veto message and the language that the governor used in terms of us tying his hands by the language that we offered in the original bill,” Mr. Vialet said. “And after having a chance to go back and look at it, official can have a bunch of different interpretations, so the best thing to do is to take out official, and now the only word that is left is ceremonial because I think that was the intent of the original legislation and not to limit Government House.”

Still, it remains to be seen what constitute an “official” vehicle, once they are purchased by the Mapp administration.

11 Responses to “No limousines for Mapp & Potter!”

  • what's new (10/05/2016, 10:48) Like (19) Dislike (2) Reply
    only in the BVI Dr. Smith can waste our money on a new vehicle
    • help me (10/05/2016, 15:20) Like (3) Dislike (2) Reply
      The if you read and could understand you would have seen that the issue is not purchasing new vehicles. The issue is purchasing them for ceremonial purposes. So with that being said are you suggesting that the Premier's official vehicle is ceremonial?
  • All I can say is... (10/05/2016, 11:12) Like (19) Dislike (0) Reply
    Well Sah! Coffee brewing in high places. Friendship Day soon come, the NDP will buy one for you guys as a friendship day present. Our Economy is Robust, so we have Big Spenders over here. LOL
  • one termers (10/05/2016, 11:15) Like (10) Dislike (1) Reply
    These guys are gone next election because they are too lavish like some of those in the BVI.
  • OMG (10/05/2016, 12:09) Like (3) Dislike (7) Reply
    No limo that's outrageous,how will they now get around?
  • prez obama (10/05/2016, 21:34) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    Were they asking for one like the beast?
  • R (11/05/2016, 22:33) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    @OMG, you are right. Or maybe they can make it a motorize bike.

Create a comment

Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.


Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.