Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

Booth @ QEII Bridge to promote VI heritage not to collect toll- Premier Fahie

- $18K being spent on storm resilient structure
The Government of the Virgin Islands has stated that the structure under construction at the Queen Elizabeth II Bridge that links Tortola and Beef Island is not for the purpose of collecting a toll but rather to further promote the history and heritage of the territory. Photo: VINO
Premier and Minister of Finance Hon Andrew A. Fahie (R1), left, expressed surprise that Opposition Leader Hon Marlon A. Penn (R8) was seeking certain answers on the construction of the booth at the QE II Bridge, since the project was approved by the previous National Democratic Party (NDP) government of which Hon Penn was a member. Photo: VINO/File
Premier and Minister of Finance Hon Andrew A. Fahie (R1), left, expressed surprise that Opposition Leader Hon Marlon A. Penn (R8) was seeking certain answers on the construction of the booth at the QE II Bridge, since the project was approved by the previous National Democratic Party (NDP) government of which Hon Penn was a member. Photo: VINO/File
The structure at the QE II Bridge is being built with concrete instead of wood to be more resilient to storms. Photo: VINO
The structure at the QE II Bridge is being built with concrete instead of wood to be more resilient to storms. Photo: VINO
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI- The Government of the Virgin Islands has cleared the air that the structure under construction at the Queen Elizabeth II Bridge that links Tortola and Beef Island is not for the purpose of collecting a toll but rather to further promote the history and heritage of the territory.

During the October 17, 2019 Seventh Sitting of the First Session of the Fourth House of Assembly, Leader of the Opposition Honourable Marlon A. Penn (R8), during the question and answer segment, asked Premier and Minister of Finance Honourable Andrew A. Fahie (R1) for the cost of the structure, what it is, who authorized its construction, its purpose and if the community, territory or the District Representative were consulted on its building.

Premier Fahie said the structure is being built to showcase the history and culture of the territory and to provide an additional talking point for tour guides, taxi and residents. He added a sign will be erected adjacent to the heritage site showcasing the cultural relevance of the structure.

“The structure is being built with concrete instead of wood to serve as storage for tourism related items and be more resilient to storms,” explained the Premier, while noting it is budgeted to cost some $18,289.26, “for materials and labour.”

Construction was approved under NDP Gov’t

Premier Fahie also expressed surprise that Hon Penn was seeking certain answers, since the project was approved by the previous National Democratic Party (NDP) government of which Hon Penn was a member.

“The BVI Tourist Board has informed that the district’s representative was part of previous meetings held before my tenure in government where the project was discussed and as such his consultation was sought in the past, seeing that the project was already approved by the previous administration and not this current administration.”

Hon Penn insisted he was not consulted on the construction of the concrete structure. “Mr Speaker, as you must appreciate, Premier, as Representative of the District I get numerous calls about what’s happening there.

“People are still wondering if we are still trying to charge tolls again. So I think it is important for us when we are doing these type of initiatives in communities that we have proper dialogue with the representatives and the communities. Even if something was done previously this is something totally [different from] what was built previously.”

Premier Fahie, while noting that he understands the point of Hon Penn, insisted that the project was approved under the previous administration but that the Government was only making the structure storm resilient.

Opposition Leader clashes with Jr Tourism Minister

Meanwhile, a back and forth ensued when Junior Minister of Tourism Honourable Shereen D. Flax-Charles (AL) told the House that several attempts were made by a BVITB officer responsible for the project to reach Hon Penn to provide him with information on the structure previously requested.

Hon Flax-Charles contended that the Opposition Leader never responded to the calls and charged that Members should adopt the habit of responding to phone calls made to them. Hon Penn was adamant no one tried to reach him.

The Junior Tourism Minister was also accused by Hon Penn of referring to him as a liar prior to her rising to her feet. Speaker of the House Honourable Julian Willock insisted; however, that he did not hear such a remark and the matter was put to rest.

17 Responses to “Booth @ QEII Bridge to promote VI heritage not to collect toll- Premier Fahie”

  • Toll collection (18/10/2019, 16:00) Like (15) Dislike (12) Reply
    That structure is a waste of public funds. Reinstate the collection if a crossing fee which would result in increase revenue income. My 3cents..
    • NezRez (18/10/2019, 19:27) Like (10) Dislike (10) Reply
      That's exactly what we have been saying. Government acts as though they doesn't need the revenue. They can still have a pay bridge and place a plaque there depicting our heritage and history. We have to start thinking REVENUE! It is not too late to change the plan of it being free. So many cars come over this bridge daily, do you know the amount of money that can be collected? Easy!
      • NezRez (20/10/2019, 12:51) Like (2) Dislike (4) Reply
        For all of you who hit dislike, you never feel you should do your share to help government. All you want are free everything while you contribute nothing. Greed and selfishness is a terrible thing.
    • Wasting money is out cultural heritage (21/10/2019, 08:27) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
      This is the ideal why to highlight our cultural history of paying far too much money to one of our own for something that we don’t really need. We should have paid $1m for the hut - remember we have the most expensive per ft bridge in the world.
  • GG (18/10/2019, 17:38) Like (13) Dislike (3) Reply
    $18000 without a cistern and bathroom, 1 room????????????WOW!!!!! JUST WOW!!!!!!!!!!!That got to be part of the 1000 jobs 1000 days
  • lol (18/10/2019, 17:41) Like (8) Dislike (1) Reply
    Mr hycraft and Newton Construction would have built that for $6000
  • WHAT!!! (18/10/2019, 19:26) Like (12) Dislike (4) Reply
    If this is supposed to be about our history why is it being made of concrete build it as the original was that is our history.
    • SHUT UP (21/10/2019, 05:37) Like (2) Dislike (2) Reply
      Build it as original and when the first set of high wind start to blow and destroy it, and it out there floating away, you will be the first to say, government should have known better. There’s just no pleasing you people.
  • old (18/10/2019, 20:56) Like (2) Dislike (2) Reply
    While it's a new structure its end results must and should look like antique. Old old old. Placing that stick with coconut cup for payment is the way to go. Revenue revenue dont just say it's for free, even if its 25 cents it adds up over a period of time. I think some passes sold to drivers who frequently pass to and fro on a constant basis. Think this is the way to go. My opinion
  • Kirk Hendrix (18/10/2019, 21:59) Like (6) Dislike (0) Reply
    This is so Fiscally irresponsible. Jah.
  • wow (18/10/2019, 22:46) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    It’s Airport Authority workers that was building it!
  • Lord 0, Pay up (19/10/2019, 06:11) Like (2) Dislike (4) Reply
    Great. Nice. However. I think every private car crossing that bridge should pay $10 . Taxes and companies $20. This will cover a Month of free passing.. Renewal monthly .. Come on. The person station there has to be paid... In most countries where there is a major bridge connecting two islands or major cities there is a toll...
  • lodger (19/10/2019, 07:02) Like (6) Dislike (0) Reply
    If you have a toll you have to pay for several people to collect and account for them. Is that economically viable?
  • How?? (21/10/2019, 05:57) Like (7) Dislike (0) Reply
    When the old man was there for years and years with his little sausage can nailed to a stick collectiing the lil 25 cents, it was a problem. It was repeatedly questioned, “wha he doing with that money and where the money goin?” It was even a bigger problem when ‘they’ decided to build a permanent bridge from the dilapidated wooden bridge, after all the 25 cents over the year’s couldn’t even cover a fraction of the total cost. Fast forward some years, permanent bridge already built, y’all still want to go back to collect (toll) for another 100 years. FOR WHAT? And you know what? The complaining will begin AGAIN!!! Jeez man. He said it’s not a toll booth. Leave it alone and let’s move on. Why does everything have to be a problem? Especially if you may not agree with it. Things won’t always be what you want or what you like. It is what it is. Move on!!!
  • Local (22/10/2019, 15:06) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    MIGHT AS WELL CHARGE BC SO MUCH MONEY USED TO BUILD IT.. STOP FLUSH GOVERNMENT MONEY PUT IT TO PROPER USED.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.