Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

Will Royal Caribbean Ever Live Up to Its Promises to Falmouth Jamaica?

Jim Walker (Left) asks if Royal Caribbean Ever Live Up to Its Promises to Falmouth Jamaica. Photo: Provided
By Jim Walker
Cruise Law News

Last week I traveled to Jamaica to visit clients in Montego Bay and Ocho Rios. During our trip, we also attended to some matters in the port town of Falmouth where Royal Caribbean parks its new mega-ships, the Genesis class Oasis of the Seas and the Allure of the Seas.

Falmouth is the capital of Trelawny parish, Jamaica, located on Jamaica's north coast near Montego Bay.

Falmouth was named after the birthplace of Sir William Trelawny in Falmouth, Cornwall, Britain. In the late 1700's, Jamaica was the world’s leading sugar producer. At the turn of the 1800's, one hundred sugar plantations in Trelawny parish provided sugar and rum for export to Britain. Falmouth has a notorious past because it was a center for the slave trade from Africa. Based on its rum, sugar and slave business, it became one the wealthiest ports in the "New World."

Falmouth has since fallen on hard times; its quaint Colonial architecture appears now largely in a state of ruin.
Several years ago, Royal Caribbean had a problem. It designed its new "Genesis" class cruise ships (Oasis of the Seas and Allure of the Se) but few ports could accommodate them. These mega ships were far too big to dock at the Freeport / Montego Bay facility.

The cruise line approached Jamaica and proposed a deal where Royal Caribbean would agree to use Falmouth as a port for its new cruise ships - provided that Jamaica would spend around $120 million deepening its port and creating a new facility to handle the new ships. The trade-off to Jamaica for this investment would supposedly be the infusion of money into Falmouth and the surrounding parish when the Oasis and the Allure, each with over 6,000 passengers, arrived in town.

Falmouth has a population of around 7,500. In theory, the population of the town would essentially double any time one of the Genesis class ships arrived at port, with lots of Americans with cash in their pockets.

Jamaica jumped at the deal. No environmental impact statement or detailed economic analysis was prepared. The Port Authority of Jamaica (PAJ) prepared promotional materials suggesting that "the destination will deeply reference the town's history, offering visitors a unique sensory experience of the Colonial era." Royal Caribbean's President Adam Goldstein signed the deal with Jamaica's Prime Minister Bruce Golding and promised to deliver 400,000 passengers a year to Falmouth over the next 20 years, with an expectation that each passenger would spend over $100 in the port.
So is Royal Caribbean living up to its promises to Falmouth?

The Allure of the Seas was in Falmouth when we arrived. To my surprise, there were relatively few cruise passengers sightseeing, eating in restaurants, or buying souvenirs in town. It was hard to determine whether the passengers were remaining on the gigantic Allure city-to-itself cruise ship, or they had left in tour buses.

There are few signs that Royal Caribbean has invested anything in Falmouth. There is a new plaza in the middle of the town which replaced a traffic roundabout. There are a few newly planted palm trees desperately in need of irrigation.We asked a number of store owners and local Jamaicans what they thought about the new port. A few restaurant owners were appreciative of the cruise ships which brought crew members looking for a place to eat and relax. But no cruise passengers were inside. Most Jamaicans expressed mixed feelings, complaining that the passengers are loaded up in cruise-line-arranged tour buses inside of the port, where excursions sold are largely for the benefit of the cruise line and then the passengers are quickly bused out of Falmouth towards Ocho Rios and Dunn's River Falls.

Were Royal Caribbean promises to Falmouth just sweet talk and part of the seduction of Jamaica to belly up over $100 million to dredge a deeper port for the Oasis and Allure mega ships which could not port in Freeport? Will even a dime of the hundreds of millions of dollars in cruise line profits ever find their way into schools for the kids of Falmouth or the sick and infirm in the modest medical center at the outskirts of this historic old town?

When we left Falmouth to drive over to Ocho Rios, we parked and looked back at the new port. I took a photo of the Allure of the Seas looming over the few two story buildings at the port which were not knocked down during the "revitalization" of Falmouth. I could not help but think what an appropriate image of the relationship between this huge cruise company and the little town of Falmouth.

Counting all passengers and crew, the Allure contains more people than all of Falmouth. When the cruise ship left to sail back to Miami, it was leaving with literally tens of millions of dollars destined for the cruise line's coffers.

Aside from the money spent on Bob Marley t-shirts and wood carvings, few U.S. dollars remained in Falmouth.

As a history major, I believe that the answers to questions about the future remain firmly planted in the past.

Jamaica has a history of being exploited by foreign plantation owners, sugar barons, slave owners, and bauxite-mining companies.

In the end, Royal Caribbean will do no better for Falmouth than those in the past who have taken greatly and given little in return to this beautiful island.

24 Responses to “Will Royal Caribbean Ever Live Up to Its Promises to Falmouth Jamaica?”

  • NDP voter (15/07/2012, 09:46) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    is this not the same people doing our cruise ship project? we smell a rat
  • face to face (15/07/2012, 09:56) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    I saw Mark on TV last night and he kept saying that it won't cost us anything because the $75mil is coming from private sources...this is another Biwater deal...people see what happen in JAMDOWN????
    • Movements (15/07/2012, 10:58) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      I agree there should be concern here but, the Jamaican Government must be A$$HOLES!! They had Royal Caribbean by their balls and let them sweet talk them? If they want their ships to come they should be the ones investing the money NOT the Government. With the BVI plan it isn't the Government investing millions, it's the people that want to come in and that's how it should be. This would never fly in the BVI. Government spending over 100mil based on a promise? NO! The Jamaican Government dropped the ball on this one. If Royal invested their own money, they would ensure measures were put in place to make it back. Now they fool the government over there AGAIN into spending their own money while the cruise line now looks out for itself. All they needed was a parking space and they got it. Who to blame?? I think our situation and theirs is different but I still think it's something we can learn from, I hope Mark them WATCHING!
      • same old person (15/07/2012, 17:57) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
        Stink Mouth Movements aka Breaking News aka Myron!!!! why you trying to change your tune?????
    • Bull (15/07/2012, 11:55) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      This cruise Pier Development in Road Town is as far as night is from day away from biwater. Biwater cost the government nothing. The Pier Project will cost the government $8 for every passenger landed, that is what the Government has to pay the developers. You people need to read and learn how to understand the issues before making accusations. Tell me where government has to pay Biwater anything, except for the water which they will be buying at a far cheaper rate than they are now paying. Besides, after 15 years the Biwater plant belongs to government free of cost. What is government going to get form the Port Developers after 15 years?
      • don q (15/07/2012, 16:43) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
        Thanks for this cause the people are so confused!!
      • black man (15/07/2012, 23:26) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
        They are all the same the selling out of the bvi to foreign interest
      • concerned (16/07/2012, 07:38) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
        you are the best, reverse every thing you write and you will be on track!!!! Government will buy water the Government will collect head tax tell which one is a cost
  • job market (15/07/2012, 09:57) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    wow what ah ting
  • john public (15/07/2012, 10:11) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    we have to becareful the samething dont happens here
    • --------------------- (15/07/2012, 23:55) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      NDP pease explain why I should be embracing this project after what happen in Jamaica? and what is about to take place in this BVI my beloved country????
  • ooooo (15/07/2012, 11:48) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    i wonder if those ndp watch dogs read this?
  • hog city (15/07/2012, 11:52) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    them always on fraser's harbour project but them aint seeing how that anguilla man trying to sell the same wickham's cay that noel lloyd them fought so hard for....and before i forget, brushy and wilfred from sea cow's bay...they fought like hell for the cay too
  • Laurie rhymer (15/07/2012, 11:56) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    "those foreigners will be selling diamonds and gold while the locals selling coconuts and straw hats"
  • vip (15/07/2012, 12:13) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    lets hope cromwell reads this to the public too like what he did with his biwater research
  • Sister (15/07/2012, 13:03) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    A statistical report of visitor arrivals to the Territory in 2010 from the BVI Tourist Board reported that the year saw 501, 451 cruise ship visitors. The guaranteed amount of passengers we are being offered by the participating cruise line being Disney is 425,000 minimum passenger arrivals per year. It sounded impressive until you put it in perspective and in the deal we will be giving a chunk of all arrival tax to Tortola Port Partners Limited , a joint venture of the Jay Cashman Group and the United Infrastructure Group (UIG) also known as the group of private investors. The Public meanwhile are giving a 48 year rent free lease of 4 acres of prime waterfront also known as a Public/Private partnership!!!
    • Flanks (18/07/2012, 16:38) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      That's only two ships smarty pants. By time Carnival, Royal Caribbean and others join in, it will be around 650,000 - 700,000 visitors. The figure you quoted is the total of ALL ships! The guaranteed 425,000 is only from TWO SHIPS!
  • mask man (15/07/2012, 17:37) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    thanks for this article VINO we could have never seen this on Platinum..NDP I voted for ayo so mahson ayo go sitdung with dis port project..if dem do this to JA they will do tis to BVI!
  • land mass (15/07/2012, 18:05) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    the is a good lesson and read for the BVI...Mr. Vanterpool please take notes and do not let the BVI end up in this sad state of affairs with this port project.... Did we not learn any lessons from the bates long term leases....
  • Eagle and Buffalo (15/07/2012, 20:20) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Jim Walker has a provoking take on the benefits to the Falmouth community of port project that may have some similarities and promises of the proposed pier project{s). Though Jim may be on target with his his research, we need to hear from the other sides. Often times, an issue gnerally has at least three sides: your side, my side, the unvarnished reality. Jim presented his side but to be fair we need to hear from the Jamaican government, particularly the port authority, and from a cross section of Falmouth residents. On the other hand, it is not suprise that there were not loads of cruise passengers hanging out at the port in Falmouth. Cruise passengers , many of whom save for years or get in debt, do not go cruises hang out at ports; they can probably duplicate the port experience aboard ship. The majority of passengers want to get off the ship to visit historical sites, go sight seeing, sample the local cuisine, go swimming, explore exotic flora and fauna, immerse in the local culture....etc. And they only have a few hours to do so. True the port needs the draft to safely accommodate mega ships and the port facilitie sneed to be aesthetically pleasing. Further, the port need to be designed to force passengers through shopping areas. But do we need to yield control of our scarce, water front property for 48-years to outsiders? This needed to be fully discussed and probably put to a referendum. Is it true that there is no cost to BVIslanders? This project costs the BVI and BVIslanders. Every project has both explicit and implicit costs an dso does this project. What is the opportunity cost of leasing of 4 acres of prime, scarce, waterfront property for 48 years? What is the opportunity cost of diverting $8 dollars of passenger tax to the developer? What is the opportunity cost of relocating "Tent City," causing overcrowding at another location? What is the opportunity of buying out lease, if needed at some future date? Further, is this a win-win for the BVI or the developer? Lets fly like a gaggle of eagles and not wander aimlessly about like a herd of buffaloes. Buffaloes tend to follow off a cliiff; whereas a gaggle of geese are constantly changing leadership positions. Lets climb up to the crows nest and take a helicopter view of any squalls and shoals that may be ahead.
  • if you want to know more (15/07/2012, 21:56) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    www.cruiselawnews.com/2011/05/articles/caribbean-islands/will-royal-caribbean-ever-live-up-to-its-promises-to-falmouth-jamaica
  • in the news (15/07/2012, 23:27) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Come on - I am sure Mark and Cline read this article before...I am for the project but why do we need ferris wheel for visitors??? If you need an amusement park they will go to Fla


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.