Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

VI worst off due to previous Gov't's failure to take hard cost cutting measures – FS

- Says for last four years expenditure growing at 10 %, revenue remains flat!
The measures implemented by the then Virgin Islands Party Government in 2010 should have been more significant and has put the VI now in a worst situation, according to the Financial Secretary Neil Smith.
Financial Secretary Neil Smith says the Territory's expenditure for last four years is growing at 10 percent while revenue remains flat
Financial Secretary Neil Smith says the Territory's expenditure for last four years is growing at 10 percent while revenue remains flat
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI – The decision to reduce expenditure in the civil service by more than $13 million this year could have been less dramatic had the previous Government made some “significant decisions” in 2010 when it introduced several cost cutting measures which has now put the Virgin Islands in a worst financial position.

This is according to Financial Secretary Neil Smith who explained the current status of revenue and expenditure in the Territory and the decision to cut expenditure during an HR Talk held yesterday January 10, 2012 at the Central Administrative Complex.

In June 2010, the then Virgin Islands Party Government had anannounced 14 cost-cutting measures which were expected to address the issue of growth of the public service and the effects of the global economic crisis and included measures such as a freeze on external hiring, sharing of human and other resources between departments and the discontinuation of annual increments paid to contract workers. The measures had taken effect on July 1, 2010.

Smith said at that time, when the Government implemented those cost cutting measures, it should have actually made “some significant decisions then and we did not”. “And what happen, it actually put us in a worst position today than we would have been then. So the cuts they would have made in 2010 would not have had to be as dramatic as these that we have to do in order to survive,” the Financial Secretary explained.

The Financial Secretary told civil servants that over the past five years and even before that there was a situation where the Territory’s revenues into Central Government have not kept pace with the expenditure growth.

“So revenue growth for us has stopped within the past four years, four three years ago with the financial crash that you had in the United States and the global recession that followed as a result of it and so every year we have been faced with an ever more increasing problem where the difference between the funds that have to spend and the expenditure expectations got ever more and more slim.”

However, he said within the past two and a half years or so, the VI has been “living on borrowed time” for some time now during the last few years and every effort has been made to insulate civil servants from that reality.

Plain hard facts: expenditure growing, revenue flat

“Plain and simple, whereas expenditure has been growing at a rate that operational expenditure, the cost of running the civil service has been growing of a rate of about 10 percent per year, our revenues have remain flat for the last three or four years, just the plain hard facts,” he bluntly stated.

This situation, the FS explained left the Government with two choices, either to continue the depend on existing cash balances as was done in the last few years and is steadily dwindling or whether to make a decision to reverse that trend and build up the cash reserves.

Smith further said he does not believe the VI is in hard times but rather that it is challenging stating that the highest the VI’s Gross Domestic Product ever fell which was in 2009 was to 12 percent which was lucky for the VI compared to the situation in other European countries whose GDP dropped to 25 percent and some Caribbean countries which had GDP’s fall over 20 percent.

The FS said this year 2012 will not necessarily be a better year in the global economy and unless the Virgin Islands do something different it can expect a difficult year.

The civil service comprise of approximately 3, 200 employees and the cost to operate the service stands at some 40 percent of the Territory's operating operating budget.

23 Responses to “VI worst off due to previous Gov't's failure to take hard cost cutting measures – FS ”

  • billy b (11/01/2012, 07:31) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    There you go, you heard it from the Financial Secretary himself, VIP WAS NEGLIGENT. This is why we're at where we're at and yet people will go to their graves defending THE VIP. Well sah, blind are we...
  • CNN (11/01/2012, 08:15) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    So let Ralph tek dat see Neil bashing him now and when he had the chance to get rid of Neil he allowed him to be confirm to the post of FS…Tek dat now Uncle Ralph dey bouy government in now and he throwing links on VIP..haaheee
    • Real Talk (11/01/2012, 09:54) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      LOL!! What did I miss? Neil is now saying what we the people on the street been saying for the past 2yrs! What bashing are you talking about? LOL!! The ones saying Neil sabatoged VIP, really? Oh, it was Neil that forced that district representative to build his personal marina using almost $1Million of our taxdollars? Oh, Neil again with paving an already proper road when others needed to be addressed? Wait, or was it Neil who paved the private estate up in Havers, costing over $600K of our taxdollars? This damn Neil was the one that wasted $500K on stoplights at the roundabout? Neil spent over $1mil on a fence around BVIHS ignoring the infrastructure inside the school? HOLD UP, did we vote for Neil? NO!! Who was responsible for spending when and where? THE MINISTERS! Everytime Neil opened his mouth and voiced concern, he was shouted down and called an NDP operative. If they listened to him they would be the Government right now, REAL TALK!
      • DADDY FRIDAY (11/01/2012, 11:19) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
        Real Talk stay in London bossman and do not come back to harass we local people with your hogwash!
      • YES I (11/01/2012, 14:44) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
        Six runs in the Oval......... dem had listen we wont be here now.....
  • billy b (11/01/2012, 08:24) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    this guy was constantly sabotaging vip
    • the real billy b (11/01/2012, 09:32) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      Go ahead impersonating me and see how far you get, the real billy b did NOT say, "this guy was constantly sabotaging vip". Find something constructive to say and you will not find the need to impersonate me, IDIOT
    • Sea Cow's Bay Gal (11/01/2012, 09:52) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      He deliberately hold up the money, saying the country is brokes. Especially when the VIP wanting to give out some bush cutting works about 2 months before election. You was saying it did not had any money to do so. then 4 months after ( 1 month after election) it had money for bush cutting, drain and ghut cleaning and even guardrails painting. So how all of a sudden it got money now. It got money to hire Claude Skelton- Cline, Vance Lewis and now Pastor Cline. You were working to degrade the VIP and here now trying to make the NDP shine. Even a fool could know that money could not have just appeared out of the blue. The money was always there.
  • Look at whole picture (11/01/2012, 09:30) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    we clearly have a bloated, inefficient public sector, and until this is trimmed down, we will never climb out of our problem. But they are al voters, so which party will do it ?
    • WOW (11/01/2012, 10:24) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      Look at the whole picture........and what happens after this trimming takes place? What picture do you see then?
  • Look closely (11/01/2012, 10:32) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    When the previous administration was looking for the FS to discuss these issues? The FS always travelling and finding excuses of makig himself not available for any kind of forum. While VIP administration was blamed for this siutation, the FS and other Heads of Department a chunk of monies for work not justified. When Hon. Dancia Penn was trying to introduce some save cost measures FS never paid any attention to such. FS actions at HR Talk were unethical and un professional. Further more we clearly see that he is a NDP supporter. Question, Did VIP Administration touch the SAP will they were in power? Now NDP is using the SAP
    • billy b (11/01/2012, 11:28) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      How can the FS over-ride any decision made by the former Minister Dancia?????? How???? You people just jump on here talking crap because it sounds good to you at the time and not trying to filter out sense from nonsense And if I was Neil and the government doing stupidness, I too will find whatever excuse I need to find not to be in their midst, what's your point????
  • MeArm (11/01/2012, 10:37) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    He He Ha HA HE HE HA HA you all got the government you wanted. I would put my head on the block and say that Ralphie would have exhausted all other options before they even thought about suffering the poor workers. Yes, they added alll kinda a new high costs unecessary consultants and now want to stiffle the people. It wouldn't be long before they lay off people. Say I Say so! Don't know why people are surprised because they hinted this action very strongly in their campaigns!, but you all were busy "doing dis ting" The FS could say what he want because he collects a big FAT salary every month!
    • Real Talk (11/01/2012, 14:11) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      So what if they lay off? We have 3,200 civil servants right now in a country that has just about 30,000 people!!!!!! And what do we get for it? They could lay off the lazy ones and keep the productive ones! You work to get pay, not show up to get paid! Further, an increment should be discretional not automatic! If you know you'll get what's supposed to be a 'performance' increase, for doing nothing, what's your incentive to work? If I'm working with you, I'm busting my ass doing work, you're on msn all day and at the end of it all, we both get the same 3% increase. What do you think will happen next year? I will be on msn and facebook all day, then we both get raises for NOTHING! If you're late, calling in sick, out all the time, you shouldn't get any increment, you should get warning letters and if you still don't 'buck up' you get sent home! Since when laying off obvious dead weight to save a country is a bad thing? Schups!
  • BACK UP (11/01/2012, 10:59) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    The rich getting richer while the poor getting poorer. Who elected the FS?! I don't want to hear a thing from he. Why he don't say how much he collecting.
  • Curve the Cut (11/01/2012, 11:12) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    The increment cut should be curved. Not 50% across the board. I don't think it's fair for someone one in Grade 1 who makes $516 a year in increment be cut to $258 and the highest Grade 21 that makes $3,139 a year in increment still carrying home over $1,500. Do we see the great disadvantage in a 50% across the board increment cut? Cousin Orlando and Cousin Neil both of you need to re-visit this issue and came again please. Every year civil servants look forward for their annual increment and now the Government is taking it away from them. This is going to reflect negatively on the quality and quantity of work produce by the service. Most if not all will say I am getting 50% increment so I will produce 50% work. This is not good when we have so many government departments working at a low and poor standard already. PLEASE REVISIT THE ISSUE BEFORE IT IS FINALIZED!!!!
    • billy b (11/01/2012, 11:31) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      @curve the cut Be glad your increment rather than your job. Shut up and give thanks
    • Real Talk (11/01/2012, 14:14) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      LOL @ curve the cut! The real question is how many civil servants actually work hard and deserve the increment? I know there are a lot of hard working civil servants who are very productive and go out of their way. Instead of cutting across the board, they should've made it discretionary, based on your annual performance review. The people who work get their full increment, those who play around all year get nothing! They probably would've saved more money that way! That's how it's done in the real world!
    • Strupes (12/01/2012, 06:57) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      The majority of them same Grade 1 civil servants lucky to get $258 extra a year. Who knows can speak.
    • big mouth (17/01/2012, 09:55) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      This would be a golden opportunity to get rid of all of you who think like this, you ungrateful fool.
  • ooooo (11/01/2012, 12:28) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    i want to see if these folks going to sit back and allow ndp to take their money away and give it to OJ and claude them?
    • Janet Williams (11/01/2012, 19:27) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      the fs is an NDP so he just showing his true colours end of story!!!
  • Quiet Storm (11/01/2012, 18:50) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Civil servants should refrain from appearing partisan, particularly making public statements that show preference for one party over another. Civil servants should perform their duties consistent with policies, rules and regulations with pride and professionalism regardless of which party is in power. If they cannot do this they should not be in public service. They should express their politics at the ballot box on election day. Politicians come and go and civil servants are the only constant. And the public should have confidence in civil servant, believing that the their actions are non- partisan. Further, ministers also need the confidence and assurance that civil servant can be trusted and will work cooperatively to deliver high level services to the public. Moreover, any government must realize that what is good for the goose is good for the gander, and what goes around comes around. This level of behavior needs closer examination. If this behavior was intended to help the NDP, I'm not sure it will resonate. The Premier should shou loudly and clearly from the mountain top against this partisan chatter. I have no dog in this fight; I'm independent and call it as I see it. But if looks like a duck and it waddles like a duck, it is a duck.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.