Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

UPDATE: ‘Bob’ Hodge & others get leave for Judicial Review!

Judicial Review set for September 30, 2013
Earl Delville 'Bob' Hodge, seen here following his appearance in the High Court on May 21, 2013, was described as the alleged mastermind of the drug ring. Photo: VINO
Carlston Beazer (left) and Chad Skelton following their appearance in the High Court on May 21, 2013. Photo: VINO
Carlston Beazer (left) and Chad Skelton following their appearance in the High Court on May 21, 2013. Photo: VINO
Roberto “Tico” Harrigan following his appearance in the High Court on May 21, 2013. Photo: VINO
Roberto “Tico” Harrigan following his appearance in the High Court on May 21, 2013. Photo: VINO
Attorney General Dr. Christopher Malcolm has held firm to his side’s conviction that the governor acted fairly and that there was no abuse of power in requesting a second Order to Proceed with an extradition hearing for five men accused of being involved in a drug ring. Photo: VINO/File
Attorney General Dr. Christopher Malcolm has held firm to his side’s conviction that the governor acted fairly and that there was no abuse of power in requesting a second Order to Proceed with an extradition hearing for five men accused of being involved in a drug ring. Photo: VINO/File
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI - Justice Vicki Ann Ellis has granted leave in the High Court of the Virgin Islands for four of five men wanted by the United States (US) Government to file for Judicial Review over a second extradition request made by the US.

The men filing for Judicial Review are Earl ‘Bob’ Hodge, Roberto 'Tico' Harrigan, Chad Skelton and Carlton Beazer.

The decision was announced this morning July 5, 2013 and according to Justice Ellis, "For the reasons that are set out in the judgment, the court would exercise its discretion so as to grant leave to the applicants to file an application for judicial review with respect to the Governor's decision to issue the Order to Proceed on the 11th October 2012...”

Justice Ellis has also agreed to have a full day for the Judicial Review set for September 30, 2013.

The four men and Juan Valdez, who did not file an application in the High Court, are wanted by the US Government for allegedly being involved in a drug ring that spanned some 13 years.

The men’s lawyers, in their application for a judicial review to Justice Vickie Ann Ellis, had questioned the Governor’s decision to issue a second Order to Proceed with an extradition hearing and opined that this can be interpreted as an abuse of discretional power. They also alleged that the new request has very little "new" evidence.

The Government, through the Attorney General's (AG) Chambers, had filed an appeal against a High Court’s decision made by Justice Albert Redhead on September 17, 2012 which ruled against the extradition to the United States of the five men accused of being involved in a drug ring.

The appeal is also seeking to restore the order handed down by Senior Magistrate at the time, Valerie Stephens.

See previous article posted May 22, 2013

UPDATE: AG stands firmly by Governor’s position on drug ring accused

-Beats up on Justice Redhead’s ruling

“I am certainly not convinced that Justice [Albert] Redhead ever conducted an exhausted examination of the evidence,” was part of a statement made in the High Court yesterday May, 21, 2013 by Attorney General Dr Christopher Malcolm that totally changed the atmosphere among those in the court room at the time.

One person close to one of the accused reacted in an angry tone of voice that was clearly heard before bursting out of the court room while others mumbled loudly, which caused a few seconds of distraction in the court. AG Malcolm also reacted to his statement none verbally and was cautioned by Justice Vicki Ann Ellis that what he said was being recorded.

The defense in their application for a judicial review to Madame Justice Vickie Ann Ellis, questioned the Governor’s decision to issue a second Order to Proceed with an extradition hearing and opined that this can be interpreted as an abuse of discretional power. They also alleged that the new request has very little "new" evidence.

AG Malcolm held firm to his side’s conviction that the governor acted fairly and that there was no abuse of power, that they were in disagreement with Justice Redhead’s high court ruling, which declared the Virgin Islands as the appropriate forum for the trial of five men accused of being in a drug ring and that Justice Redhead's judgment did not communicate the basis for the forum declaration.

Malcolm maintained that the governor’s decision to issue a second Order to Proceed was permissible and in accordance with the relevant laws. He further added that nothing has been submitted to the court to suggest that the governor abused his power.

Earlier in his presentation to the High Court yesterday, the AG said that it was his formal submission that the application for judicial review by the defendant was an abuse of discretional use of process. “What we must be concerned with is whether there was a wrongful exercise of discretion which is shown where it is established that the discretion that was confirmed was exercised beyond the by-law.”

He further stated that what was clear was that the governor was careful not to take on to himself a decision making policy of examination of evidence. “In this regard my lady, further argument is that once that matter is properly before the Magistrate, in considering then all questions relating to sufficiency of evidence, I don’t see why it is that a committal order should not be given.” To that extent the AG’s argument has been that the application by the defense lawyers is premature. “Pre-mature because what is being sought here is to prevent the Magistrate from carrying out the law.” He added that based on the explanation given, it would be irrational of the High Court to not issue a second order.

The Government, through the Attorney General's (AG) Chambers, has filed an appeal against a High Court’s decision made by Justice Albert Redhead on September 17, 2012 which ruled against  the extradition to the United States of five men accused of being involved in a drug ring.

The appeal is also seeking to restore the order which was handed down by Senior Magistrate at the time, Valerie Stephens.

See previous article posted on May 21, 2013

Challenge against new extradition hearing for drug ring accused begins

Four of the five men implicated in what is being touted as an alleged 13-year old drug ring appeared before the high court today May 21, 2013 when legal heads commenced presentations before Justice Vicki Ann Ellis.

The intention to start a new extradition hearing in the Magistrate’s Court of the Virgin Islands during the latter quarter of last year was halted following the filing of applications by the men’s lawyers in the High Court for a judicial review of the request made by the United States (US) government who had allegedly submitted additional evidence against the accused.

It was announced on October 12, 2012 that the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) would drop the local charges against the five men and institute fresh extradition proceedings to have the men tried in the USA.

The men at the centre of the three-year old court battle are Earl Delville ‘Bob’ Hodge who is alleged to be the ring leader, Roberto Harrigan also known as 'Tico', Juan Valdez and Carlston Beazer. Only four of the five appeared in court today as the lawyer who is representing Valdez, Stephen Daniels, previously indicated that he would pursue judicial review for his client.

Today’s proceedings saw the defense lawyers and representatives for the Crown making lengthy presentations in the high court and putting forward their arguments.

The request by the US government through its Florida and North Carolina judicial systems is pending the decision of the courts here in the Virgin Islands.

In March, 2012 the then Senior Magistrate Valerie Stephens ruled that the men be extradited. However, her decision was overruled by Justice Albert Redhead on September 17, 2012 when he concluded that the men could be appropriately tried here in the Virgin Islands.

The hearing continues tomorrow May 22, 2013.

54 Responses to “UPDATE: ‘Bob’ Hodge & others get leave for Judicial Review!”

  • ? (21/05/2013, 20:19) Like (15) Dislike (0) Reply
    How come we never seen this Valdez dude ?
    • witness (22/05/2013, 00:32) Like (0) Dislike (5) Reply
      Because he is in Witness Protection.....
      • virgin gorda (22/05/2013, 07:40) Like (4) Dislike (1) Reply
        yull all so fast always in dem ppl business jah!
        • Nancy Drew (07/07/2013, 19:19) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
          No he isn't in any darn witness protection. He's just bidding his time and is up at HMPrison chilling for now. You all too damn metee.
  • mm (21/05/2013, 20:36) Like (12) Dislike (77) Reply
    Let my people free
    • land mass (22/05/2013, 01:08) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
      Poor Tola...what a state we in.
    • wise up (22/05/2013, 12:00) Like (5) Dislike (17) Reply
      a fully time them fe free the man them .jail or freedom its too long now mi son but the boys themstill look good don't worry a god over man.freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
  • moses (21/05/2013, 20:50) Like (14) Dislike (57) Reply
    Let my people go!
  • JACK BE STILL (21/05/2013, 21:37) Like (4) Dislike (46) Reply
    This could never be justice!
    • move (26/05/2013, 19:59) Like (0) Dislike (2) Reply
      ah notice yuh come out of retirement for this issue

      like yuh "food" at stake

  • wise up (21/05/2013, 22:28) Like (11) Dislike (2) Reply
    stop holding up the cash flow !!!!!!!
  • Chandra (21/05/2013, 23:21) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
    What's up with the 5th dude? Skeleton?
  • Eagle Eye (22/05/2013, 00:28) Like (10) Dislike (6) Reply
    if they aint got nothing on the man them let them out on bail atleast
    • True (05/07/2013, 14:19) Like (2) Dislike (1) Reply
      They may as well let them out on bail, lets face it they are not going to skip over to St Thomas anytime soon!
  • DADDY FRIDAY (22/05/2013, 00:58) Like (7) Dislike (11) Reply
    The out come needs to be not guilty, but lots of cost to taxpayers
  • westbest (22/05/2013, 01:45) Like (0) Dislike (15) Reply
    what is that white something those guys are holding in their hands. Is Obeah lmbao wha kinda ah jumbie i seeing here.
  • Mannie (22/05/2013, 07:34) Like (16) Dislike (7) Reply

    Tortolians have a way of glorifying wr*ng d*ing.

  • crucian (22/05/2013, 07:46) Like (6) Dislike (1) Reply
    It's called lunch...THE
  • Peaches (22/05/2013, 08:34) Like (2) Dislike (1) Reply
    This seems to be a never-ending saga. Surely, their money is probably almost depleted by now. Wow...
  • egg face (22/05/2013, 08:51) Like (3) Dislike (2) Reply
    But he is the one that give the governor the bad advise so what you all expect him to say?
  • da_fool (22/05/2013, 09:14) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    yh n pana with the locks gah cup
  • justice (22/05/2013, 09:18) Like (13) Dislike (3) Reply

    That man Malcolm is full of himself...and has no s*n$e. how can he make a statement like that about a High Court Judge simply because he doesn't agree with his assertion on the case. these people are sick. This judge will more than likely agree with Redhead. They claiming the men did their crime in BVI using a US plane,s o that ties them to US. But even though they allegedly committed the crimes via BVI, the local charges are dropped and simply because of a so called plane connection, they should be extradited? haha nonsense. once these guys have some good cash left to fight it will be a long battle.

  • bystander (22/05/2013, 09:26) Like (2) Dislike (12) Reply
    FREE BOB!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Free my people (22/05/2013, 09:31) Like (1) Dislike (8) Reply
    Malcolm need go sit down!!
  • Vinny (22/05/2013, 10:32) Like (2) Dislike (3) Reply
    check my boy sosa man.
  • ann (22/05/2013, 10:45) Like (0) Dislike (5) Reply
    I am disappointed that the JAMDOWN AG doing teh bedding of HE
  • PERNELLIE (22/05/2013, 11:07) Like (3) Dislike (6) Reply
    WHAT EVER YOU DO DO NOT DROP THE SOAP (LOL)
  • hey (22/05/2013, 13:13) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    Hey guys, what's for lunch?...lol
  • lower estate (22/05/2013, 13:45) Like (1) Dislike (12) Reply

    . When you count your first million you never forget the feelin
    That when eyes go to twitchin, palms start to itchin people be snitchin, thats when the l.e dawgs dem start shouting free sosa free sosa ...

  • kkk (22/05/2013, 16:20) Like (2) Dislike (1) Reply
    the hart of this case is that of race
  • cct (22/05/2013, 19:25) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    the Government must show beyond the shadow of a doubt that these men are responsible for a drug ring which they cannot prove!!!
  • GOVERNOR (22/05/2013, 20:28) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    MALCOM AIN HAVE A CHOICE HE HAS TO DO WA DEM SAY JUS LIKE RICHARDS AND STEVENS
  • HELP HELP HELP (23/05/2013, 00:16) Like (3) Dislike (2) Reply
    One question is there any locals that can do this job?
    • wise up (23/05/2013, 09:10) Like (1) Dislike (2) Reply
      to help help help !!!!! the locals are NOT given the chance so we will never know....look at TRC, the head post was always given to some white person NOW a local has proven that he can get the JOB done....here is the problem, its our own that continue pusing the locals to the back in favor of a non-citzen and that @uc& is not right BUT will it ever STOP ????
  • wise up (23/05/2013, 00:55) Like (0) Dislike (2) Reply
    i say; let the man them go and get back to work so the cash can flow !!!!!!
  • Fair (23/05/2013, 07:29) Like (1) Dislike (3) Reply
    its good he is trying to do his job in this matter but where is he when the ministers of government are engaging in conflict of interest at every decision they make and he who is supposed to guide and advice them is always absent. So thank you for doing your job when it suits you we appreciate it so much that we will pay you a bit more when the people are sleeping as usual.
  • each his own (23/05/2013, 09:27) Like (0) Dislike (9) Reply
    Well my friend....we can ALL hold our heads high as we can show that we were not willing to tolerate the ugly face of disgusting politics.
  • extreem (24/05/2013, 01:05) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    The people of BVI do not trust the Police Service and governor in this case.
  • Keep them (05/07/2013, 15:00) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply

    Personally, I'd rather the BVI keep their alleged drug dealers on island. I really don't want my tax dollars paying to prosecute and then house in prison the BVI's problem. Keep them. Reap what you sow.

  • ww (05/07/2013, 16:32) Like (1) Dislike (6) Reply
    just free the dam people this is crap boss
  • pic (06/07/2013, 08:29) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply




    BVI PEOPLE STOP BEING SO STUPID. TO THE END OF THIS DRUG YOU SEE WHAT ALWAYS HAPPEN ,PRISON OR DEATH . JUST RUN YOUR OWN BUSINESS ,AND KEEP TAKING YOURSELF HIGHER AND HIGHER, OR THE WHITE MAN GONA COME IN AND RUN ALL THE BUSINESS. AND WE KEEP GETTING S&*T THERE IS NO FUTURE IN THAT DRUG THING JAIL OR DEATHHHHH

  • foxy (07/07/2013, 11:34) Like (0) Dislike (1) Reply
    god is on their side he hates injustice...they will be free just trust in god and to the families keep in your knees in prayer
  • Online Now (07/07/2013, 14:03) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    School children sat this governor is behind seeing these local men extradited…things that make you want to go hummmmmmmmmmmm
  • hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm (07/07/2013, 23:41) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    look up the name Roberto Mendez-Hurtado u would see that America has already extradite this man from Columbia. who is theses fools dem gone
  • So who ? (11/07/2013, 08:56) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    Look at that clown , always putting in a show ,, idiot


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.