Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

The Asphalt Plant is a public nuisance- Workers; Residents

- Blame the plant for alleged health problems
Several persons living in the Fish Bay community said the dust emitted from the Asphalt Plant is a public nuisance and even blames it for a number of upper respiratory infections and chronic illnesses. In the absence of data to prove this allegation, persons filing the complaints said their claims can be justified. They challenged the Ministry of Health to conduct a survey of the prevalence of respiratory infections among persons who would have direct contact with the plant and residents in the area as compared to any other community of the same geographic size. Photo: VINO
FISH BAY, Tortola, VI- “Sometimes we does literally be biting heavy dust when you see they start up that plant.” This was the comment of one worker at the Government owned Asphalt Plant, and his expression was echoed by several other workers and persons living in the area.

Speaking with Virgin Islands News Online, several persons living in the Fish Bay community said the dust emitted from the Asphalt Plant there is a public nuisance and even blames it for a number of upper respiratory infections and chronic illnesses. In the absence of data to prove this allegation, persons filing the complaints said their claims can be justified. They challenged the Ministry of Health to conduct a survey of the prevalence of respiratory infections among persons who would have direct contact with the plant and residents in the area as compared to any other community of the same geographic size.

“This thing is so bad I tell you, when they throw on that plant man is so dust does take over this place,” said a man working at the Asphalt Plant. He asked not to be named for the fear of victimisation. He said that more often than not workers are forced to wear nose guards whenever the plant is in operation. “I don’t know if they never look at it but most times when they put on the plant its around lunch time,” he said.

According to workers, dust particles would enter their meals and nasal passage causing much discomfort. “Boy when you see you go home and you blow your nose is sheer thick stuff, dust pack up in your nose,” added another worker.  “It does make people sick man, and the government people know this…but the thing is the very authorities find themselves in a compromising position because the ones who own this land (where the plant is housed) are the very ones in senior seats in the government.”

Persons living in the community also expressed frustration about the level of dust emitted from the plant. They claimed that some businesses are forced to maintain sealed building thus consuming excessive amount of electricity daily by having to run air-conditioning units all day. “Don’t talk about how it does got we house, every minute you to be cleaning, your walls is a mess and your window curtains carries most of the evidence,” said one resident.

Securing a comment for the Ministry of Health was not possible at the time of following these claims of workers and residents but this news agency will continue to pursue same.

However, it is a fact that this issue has not gone blind folded by the Government as it was highlighted and aggressively pursued. The evidence of this lies in the lines of the Department of Public Department’s 2011 report presented in the House of Assembly by Minister for Communications and Works Hon. Mark. H. Vanterpool. The report stated that Government was looking at purchasing a new plant, which may cost in the vicinity of $1M. They are also exploring the possibility of having it constructed at another site.

The issue had also caught the attention of Senior Executive Service employee with the United States of America (USA) Government Department of Energy (DOE); internationally recognized environmental scientist and engineer, Dr. Vincent Adams. He had pointed to the possible health implications during an interview, which was published by Virgin Islands News Online.

17 Responses to “The Asphalt Plant is a public nuisance- Workers; Residents”

  • disatisfied voter (03/01/2013, 08:51) Like (2) Dislike (2) Reply
    What is the 6th district representative stance on this? In her term in office will she continue to repesent only a few, "special" baugers baians and continue to be invisible to everyone else.
    • TIRED OF HER TALK (03/01/2013, 09:37) Like (1) Dislike (2) Reply
      I agree with u only the baughers baians gettin representation right now and a few others i dont care who want to object, only when election come we the purcell and belle vue people would not be invisible but we got news, just a few more years, purcell alone have more people than belle vue and baughers bay put together so do the maths
      • faith (03/01/2013, 20:09) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
        What the heck you all expect from the woman in one short year. We elected a man for the past 40 years who did nothing for Baughers Bay and Belle Vue areas. Those bloody beggars in the Purcell Estate area got everything and now them bawling, and the majority of Purcell residents are not BVIslanders. Get you all lazy backsides up and stop looking handouts from the woman. I sick of you all nonsense now with you all beggar mentalities. Schupes
        • To faith (04/01/2013, 09:13) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
          Majority of purcell residents could vote though what u know bout that so put a sock in it and alot of people watch at purcell people as bad people which we are not so if they looking jobs and cant get what do u want them to do and is we put her in so we got all rights to ask for what we want, with them politrics but we know better now just a few more years
  • ooooo (03/01/2013, 09:39) Like (7) Dislike (3) Reply
    having ronnie to conduct a survey of this on skelton's land is like putting a rat to mind cheese
  • sea cow's bay massive (03/01/2013, 09:42) Like (2) Dislike (1) Reply
    we hope ayo dont want to put it in the 3rd district?......we will be watching
  • Music (03/01/2013, 09:50) Like (2) Dislike (1) Reply
    How many years has it been there? And only noe complaining!
  • bigger picture (03/01/2013, 11:49) Like (3) Dislike (1) Reply
    in keeping with government's love of building things, why would you want to move it to yet another open space in another small community? Fish bay is already part industrial. The real issue is safety and health. sickness is far more expensive than preventive precautions. This is along the same lines of the incinerator in Pockwood pond blowing toxic smoke clear across to St John. Instead of inviting polluting ships in, first take time and money to take care of the health and education of BVI. Skelton should know better as head of health.
  • Real Deal (03/01/2013, 15:04) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    Im pretty sure that the Skeltons would welcome the removal of this plant off of their property. It is indeed a nuisance for the entire area and the governments past and present know this. The plant will continue to cause much health issues and the government could never be paying enough for the trouble it's causing everyone.
  • vick (03/01/2013, 15:27) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    put it down cox heath.
  • Eagle and Buffalo (03/01/2013, 17:00) Like (5) Dislike (0) Reply
    Citing an asphalt plant in Fish Bay, a residential area, poses a serious health and safety risk for residents and imposes a negative externality (pollution), an involuntary external cost, on the whole territory. Asphalt plants releases chemicals to the air during production. These chemicals include many cancer-causing toxic air pollutants such as arsenic, benzene, formaldehyde, cadmium, VOCs .........etc. And exposure to these toxic chemicals may cause cancer, nervous system problems, liver issues, respiratory problems, skin irrations .........etc. (EPA).

    Consequently, urgent action is needed to protect workers, residents and the community at large from the toxic effects of plant emmissions. Further, emission standards must be developed, implemented and strictly enforced. Additionally, workers and residents should be medically evaluated and placed on an annual monitoring list. An asphalt undoubtedly is needed but it should located at a cite that poses the least risk to the public yet meet PWD needs. Relocate plant or retrofit plant if cost effective.


  • Eagle and Buffalo (03/01/2013, 18:35) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Usage error. Cite should have been site.
  • bright (03/01/2013, 20:55) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    right. and unfortunately, our health is a endangered species.
  • Migoman (03/01/2013, 22:49) Like (4) Dislike (8) Reply
    Just my opinion, nobody eat me alive but I am certain that that plant was there YEARS AGO ( I work there). MUCH longer than those residential structures so I don't see how its fair for them to complain about it when I'm sure they knew what to expect when building their homes in an industrialized area like Fish Bay. You don't see nobody foolish enough to build on those hills over the electricity corporation and TCP in Pockwood pond do you? No cause its zoned off as an Industrial area. Not to go off topic here but I've also heard of residents complaining of cracked cistern and homes in Fish bay. I mean, they built next to a QUARRY. What do you expect? I'm all for the relocation of the ashfault plant or atleast an upgraded one with a dust collector but I don't think any resident in fish bay has a right to voice themselves in such a demanding tone.
    • Just my reply (04/01/2013, 08:27) Like (0) Dislike (1) Reply
      Maybe many homes werent built before the quarry first existed, but local people have owned the lands surronding the quarry for almost two hundred years since the first lands bought by blacks in the new world before even the abolishment of slavery 1831 in the kingston land grant/sale and there were people living in the surronding areas since the 1940's. So there was always the possibility of more homes being built. I don't know what year the family patriacrh came from Anguilla? But I do know there was and is more than one stakeholder in the area and many of them bought there lands and not just claimed it from others. So should'nt they and there ancestors have a say as what should be. Many of the real problems stem from the new additions the crusher and sol plant which are much more recent and after many of the homes were already built.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.