Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

No blogs for ongoing matters in High Court – Justice Ellis

In a surprise move today, October 14, 2013 High Court Judge Vicki Ann Ellis ordered media houses to desist from accepting blogs/comments on articles about ongoing trials in the High Court of the Virgin Islands. Photo: VINO/File
The directive by Justice Ellis was given in open court prior to the resumption of the trial of Rodney Simmonds Jr and Yan Edwards who are accused of allegedly conspiring to murder Melbourne Francis on March 13, 2011. Photo: VINO/File
The directive by Justice Ellis was given in open court prior to the resumption of the trial of Rodney Simmonds Jr and Yan Edwards who are accused of allegedly conspiring to murder Melbourne Francis on March 13, 2011. Photo: VINO/File
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI – In a surprise move today, October 14, 2013 High Court Judge Vicki Ann Ellis ordered media houses to desist from accepting blogs/comments on articles about ongoing trials in the High Court of the Virgin Islands.

According to Ellis, blogs/comments can be accepted only after a verdict has been handed down.

This directive was made in court prior to the resumption of the trial of Rodney Simmonds Jr and Yan Edwards who are accused of allegedly conspiring to murder Melbourne Francis on March 13, 2011.

Justice Ellis also said it is the responsibility of the prosecutors to ensure all reporters are guided accordingly.

29 Responses to “No blogs for ongoing matters in High Court – Justice Ellis”

  • x factor (14/10/2013, 14:40) Like (4) Dislike (2) Reply

    Dictator

    • SHAME (15/10/2013, 09:22) Like (0) Dislike (1) Reply
      This government also want to silence everything. They want us to paint a rosy picture of things that doesn’t exist....but god is good
  • ?? (14/10/2013, 14:46) Like (1) Dislike (2) Reply
    But why them jump on platinum alone??
    • WiseUP (15/10/2013, 06:45) Like (1) Dislike (1) Reply
      Donse head, she said media houses, is platinum the only media house in the BVI?, read people, read, cheeeeeeze man.
  • Renee (14/10/2013, 14:47) Like (0) Dislike (4) Reply
    Then the media houses should boycott and not cover the court cases
  • free at last (14/10/2013, 15:55) Like (4) Dislike (4) Reply
    what happen to freedom of expression?
  • cub reporter (14/10/2013, 15:59) Like (0) Dislike (1) Reply
    Not too sure of the exact law she is using for this, but it clearly touches on "prior restraint" .....the "media houses" may have a strong legal argument against this ruling.
  • Yeaaaaa (14/10/2013, 16:16) Like (17) Dislike (2) Reply
    Very good. Y'all like to gossip too much. All y'all business 24 square miles long.
  • hmm.... (14/10/2013, 18:10) Like (0) Dislike (6) Reply
    What is wrong with blogging on an open to public case? All over the world anyone can comment on an open case. Sounds like the jurors might be influenced? Then they do not have minds of their own then.
  • ...... (14/10/2013, 18:28) Like (7) Dislike (0) Reply
    I'm so glad. You all talk too much shiat, that's why.
  • Locally made (14/10/2013, 18:52) Like (13) Dislike (2) Reply
    Good for some of you. You all like too much gossip. I believe this country is the blogging capital of the region. We need to spend more time doing something constructive. I love it.
    • Hmmm* (15/10/2013, 15:43) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      Silly people on the blogs blogging about people who have an obsession with blogging...you couldn't make this ish up I swear
  • ABC (14/10/2013, 19:49) Like (5) Dislike (1) Reply
    she is the new redhead mehson
  • apple pie (14/10/2013, 20:10) Like (1) Dislike (1) Reply
    I keep checking the news, hoping to see something promising. Instead, I get more depressed about our hopes with each passing hour about how our rights and freedom are going down the tube!!!.
  • thank you (14/10/2013, 20:16) Like (6) Dislike (0) Reply
    Thank you soooo much Justice Ellis. Good for them!!
    • Legal cry (15/10/2013, 00:53) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      Perhaps you could talk to some in the Legal fraternity and see if they share Judge Ellis views or this is just chat.
  • ann (14/10/2013, 20:18) Like (0) Dislike (1) Reply
    This country deserves better.
  • And there running!!!'nnn (14/10/2013, 22:12) Like (8) Dislike (1) Reply
    That should hold awyo MS... To the keyboard terrorists them this should of been done a long time ago. Thank u u worship #fistpump
  • what reason? (15/10/2013, 10:41) Like (1) Dislike (1) Reply
    Perhaps VINO can relate why she made this restriction on the media, why she arrived at this decision and under what laws is she able to do this? I fail to see how the public commenting on cases that come up in Court is wrong. Some criminal actions first appear in the news when charges are first laid and due to the legal process they may be in front of the Court's years later. Sometimes these individuals evade court appearances altogether. The public should be allowed to discuss the crimes. Perhaps the media houses should be more prudent in keeping very discriminatory comments from being posted, persons are innocent until proven guilty. However, it allows people to discuss the growing trend of crime. There always is debate from the persons who protect criminals and believe no one should inform the police as well as those who are for taking back the community and saying no to the criminals by reporting crimes and sharing information with the police. To take away the healthy discussion takes away public knowledge and awareness also. It also protects the criminals....for what purpose? They chose to commit the crime. Their dirty laundry deserves to brought out in public and scrutinised. Take discussion off of the crimes being committed and make it easier on the criminals is only making crime more acceptable. Usually they'll end up with a slap on the wrist at the end of the day. If the problem is potential jurors reading the blogs then it's time to increase the pool of jurors and during high cases keep them sequestered. Protecting criminals from being scrutinized by their peers is going down the wrong path.
  • 1 (15/10/2013, 14:30) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    if the media organization in the BVI was not so weak and divided they could have united and challenge this in court
  • ........................ (15/10/2013, 15:28) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    This island should be called 'DRAMAVILLE." There is so much "TING TE TALK" and so much unusual happenings - only in "THE B.V.I."
  • NCI (15/10/2013, 15:47) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Tortola is certainly full of drama and should be named "Dramaville."
  • backwards ever (15/10/2013, 16:00) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    this is a backward decision
  • I agree (15/10/2013, 17:00) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    I think she is more so doing this on behalf of the jurors. I'm pretty sure some jurors read blogs and listen to gossip more than the evidence presented in court. I mean there will still be persons talking however its a less chance of persons being convicted on based on "opinions from the bloggers"
  • Janet Williams (16/10/2013, 02:09) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    She right to ban deeds blogs ayo write too much crap tings ayo know and ting ayo aint know go Judge Vicky
  • jj (16/10/2013, 14:50) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Wisdom and compassion are needed going forward. Amen!
  • use your jurisidiction (18/10/2013, 00:08) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    why ask the dpp to regulate the media, are you not a high court judge, justice redhead would have told them do not blog point bank he wouldn't make comments and then tell the dpp you go regulate the media. the high court has inherent jurisdiction so use it
  • legal team (18/10/2013, 14:07) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Thank you VINO for being a free and democratic news site in the BVI.Please allow me to give my piece:I wish goodness for all,including the Judge, as goodness will reach my doorsteps,while those who wish evil for others,evil shall return to them[that is my daily spiritual philosophy]

    Fundamental Rights and Freedoms of the Individual-Chapter 2 and Protection of Freedom of Expression is a fundamental Right of an individual in the BVI:

    Section 23 of The V.I Constitution Order,2007 declares, In subsection (1)

    "No person shall be hindered in the the enjoyment of his or her freedom of expression"
    Subsection (2) "A person's freedom of of expression includes freedom to hold opinions without interference,freedom to receive information and ideas without interference,freedom to disseminate information and ideas without interference(whether to the public generally or to any person or class of person) and freedom from interference with his or her correspondence or other means of communication".

    Whenever there is a Trial of a criminal case at the High Court of Justice,the Judge would remind the Jurors that their concerns are about the evidence heard and seen in court and not about what they the saw and heard in the media.

    Her Majesty the Queen[In Council, on 13th June 2007 at Buckingham Palace UK] bestowed upon Her citizens and residents,in Her Majesty's Free and Democratic Territory of Her Majesty's BVI,through the power of the V.I Constitution and Her Majesty,declared that persons are free to express themselves in the media on any social matter, and in the process obviously,persons are expected to respect the privacy of others and to respect the rule of law on slander,Libel and defamation of character etc..

    I read the news of no blogs on an on-going case as instructed by the learned Judge.I respect your authoritative-madam Judge,but do you have such jurisdiction inder BVI law?Do you?Show me the law;I want to read it for myself!

    Where is it written in the BVI laws of
    (1) Contempt of court Act,Chapter 14 laws of the BVI
    (2) Magistrate Code of Procedure Act,Chapter 44 laws of the BVI
    (3) Criminal Procedure Act,Chapter 18 laws of the BVI-
    That blogging about a "PUBLIC CASE" in which the public has an interest,is a criminal offence and contempt of court in the BVI?

    Madam Judge, BVI people are very peaceful,law-abiding and loving,and Her Majesty-The Queen declared that we have freedom of speech to blog!

    This media house VINO,is very responsible and all the High Court Cases are Public Cases,and the Jurors are not "SEQUESTERED" so therefore,Her Majesty's citizens and residents of Her BVI have a right to blog on any public court-case,because,it is not an offence in the BVI to blog on an on-going Public Court-Case:

    It appears to me that we longer need parliament to make laws in the BVI;because everyone in authority today,makes their own laws to control Her Majesty's Citizens and residents!

    Look at what they did to Mr.Alred Frett the other day:
    Where he did not commit a criminal offence when VINO published an article on his behalf:
    He was not charged with a criminal offence:
    He was not tried in a criminal court,for a criminal offence:
    He was not convicted after a trial for a criminal offence:
    But it was reported in the media,that "Mr.Frett was in hot water".
    Absolute unjustified-none-sense!

    Now they come back with a no-law-authority policy["No Bloggs"] Vino,allow me to blog,lawfully.
  • T (21/04/2014, 12:14) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply

    E...s should be banned



Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.