Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

Mandatory gun sentences for Security Council discussion – Morris

Acting Commissioner of Police David Morris said a report will be submitted to the NSC on sentences for gun crimes. Photo: VINO/File
Hon. Smith is concerned about the amount of illegal weapons in the Territory.
Hon. Smith is concerned about the amount of illegal weapons in the Territory.
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI – The Police is currently looking at the pros and cons of the mandatory five year prison term for gun possession that was recommended by a local anti-crime group, which will be handed to the National Security Council (NSC) for consideration.

This was disclosed by Acting Commissioner of Police David Morris at a recent meeting that was organised by the Road Town Anti-Crime Group.

Its President, Eugenia O’Neal, had submitted a number of recommendations to Premier Dr. D. Orlando Smith – one being a mandatory 10-year sentence for any crime committed with a gun and a five-year sentence for gun possession.

However, Morris explained that there are two types of sentences - guidelines and presumptive – which are critical to a defendant’s case. “When I say guidelines I mean a lawyer can mitigate for his client and the Judge or Magistrate can decide what sentence to hand down while in a presumptive case that person will be going to jail for the maximum term.”

To this end, a report will be given to the National Security Council, the acting COP divulged. “It is just getting the strengths and weaknesses around that and then it’s up to the Premier and Governor to enact the necessary legislation.”

The anti-crime group, over the past two years, has been vocal in their call for the mandatory sentencing to curb the escalating gun crimes in the Territory.

Mrs. O’Neal, at the meeting, posited that perpetrators are not getting the kind of sentences that sends a strong deterrent message. “The uneven nature of some of the sentences that we see coming out of the courts...we don’t feel that the people are getting the kind of sentences they should.”

Premier throws support behind mandatory sentences for gun crimes

Meanwhile, Hon. Smith during an NDP radio programme on March 19, 2012, had disclosed that his Government is extremely concerned about the amount of illegal weapons in the Territory and noted that while there seems to be a difficulty in stemming the flow, systems must be put in place to address the problem.

“I recall during the last administration we recommended increase in penalties, quite severe increase in penalties but before we increased those penalties we had an amnesty period where we asked people to bring in their weapons so that they wouldn’t get these severe fines but despite that there seems to be a number of illegal weapons out there. It is a great concern for us because it is doing more harm to us as a people and as a country and therefore we have to look at other ways of preventing the use of illegal guns and the use of it in criminal conduct,” the Territory's leader had stated.

He had further said the idea of mandatory sentences and stiffer penalties must be seriously considered since the current trend poses a danger to the people and the Territory as a whole since it would have a negative effect, particularly on the tourism industry.

Currently, when tried in the Magistrate’s court, a person in possession of a firearm will face a fine not exceeding $5,000 or a term of imprisonment not exceeding 5 years. If the matter is indictable, a person in possession will face a fine not exceeding $10,000 or a term of imprisonment not exceeding 10 years.

10 Responses to “Mandatory gun sentences for Security Council discussion – Morris”

  • same old story (01/06/2012, 08:25) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    but we have this already on the books??? i am confused
  • dude (01/06/2012, 09:25) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Mandatory sentencing makes no sense, it won't deter criminals it will only penalize those of us who's houses are being victimized, make them legal & register them. Because for a fact the police cannot protect people & rarely recover items or catch burgulars so I will shoot them and take that mandatory charge....yet I am not the criminal. This will be the case more often than not.
  • Jinx (01/06/2012, 09:27) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    I agree. I think the sentences for gun crimes are too less. We are need to send out a stronger message that we will not tolerate these kind of crimes.
  • Constitutional lawyer (01/06/2012, 10:10) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    I wonder why evreyone wants to take over the duties of a judge or magistrate. Sentence is a matter for the court - not ploliticians - not commissioners of ploice - not O'Neal. Go become a judge or magistrate and then hand down sentences. Sentences have always been within the discretion of the sentencer. Each case depends on its own peculiar facts and circumstances so to have mandatory sentences are unconstitutional. See how many countries that have attempted to pass such legislations have it struck down by the courts. So don't waste more time - range of sentences can be increased but mandatory minimum or maximum sentence does not sit well with judges. They still do their own thing and these people who are lobbying for it can only talk. So, Mr. Commissioner -instead, you go and fight crimes and Ms. O'Neal - look after the City -make it pleasing to the eyes and judges and magistrates, - you continue to do your job wisely.
    • thedeer (01/06/2012, 23:28) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      This would mean that a man caught witth an assault will getmore time than the man with a revolver. Over the past three years the public have been left flabbagasted by these rediculous sentences meeted out to those found guilty of possession. It is bad when this discretion the magistrate lead to harsh punishment on those whose pockets and name are not as famous as other folks. let them have a minimum they MUST impose. some of these magistrate are only too happy to institute their ideaalogies from/on the bench ohas their agenda ineeds have
  • ABC (01/06/2012, 10:31) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    when they weak on crime the easiest thing to do is to call for more laws...the UK officers need to do some work ppl
    • lawyerboy (01/06/2012, 12:16) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      It will be good if all these people say out of the business of work for legilsators , lawyers and draftsmen. On what basis is Ms. O'Neal seeking the 10 year term or 5 year term? None whatsoever. Why must a Commissioner of Police speak out on sentences? If Parliament needs to increase the range of sentences for these offences, then it must do active consultaion with the stakeholders. It is not right for a police to dictate whether ther should be mandatory minimum senetnces. The legislature has to look at it holistically and not in isolation. I agree with the blogger that sentences are to be determined by judges and magistrates and crimes are for the police to solve. Let justice prevail in your nation. When commissioner is gone (and I hope he goes when his contract comes to an end) we will be stuck with bad laws taking away the discretion of judges and magistrates. So, Premier, beware. Dont let bad laws into our statute books. Let judges and magistartes continue to enjoy the wide discretion they have and to look at each case objectively.
  • well well (01/06/2012, 10:32) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    They are even now disclosing what is to be considered in the National Security Council, but when it suits them they use some people as scapegoats in furtherance of their agenda.
  • shark (01/06/2012, 12:22) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    well Mr premier how do you think these weapons are getting into the country.How is it when these mega yachts can come into our water,one person can come ashore and clear the whole yacht,these people just came from a foreign port.you do not know what they have on board,do you not think that this is a security problem.there are is much white into drug trafficking and they do their do but they are not checked is hard as our locals that owns a boat.
  • facts man (02/06/2012, 08:58) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Both morris and nina full of crap. In the states there is no statistics to show that hevy guns laws have reduced crime.. These people need to do some research before they speak!! And see morris talking nsc business but if vino had broke that news all hell would have break loose...


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.