Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

Magistrate tosses explosives charge against drug & ammo accused

Treston Brown, 26, was granted some amount of reprieve when a charge of possession of explosives was dismissed against him and his bail was drastically reduced by Magistrate Dr Velon John yesterday, January 21, 2014. Photo: VINO
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI – Treston Brown, 26, was granted some amount of reprieve when a charge of possession of explosives was dismissed against him and his bail was drastically reduced by Magistrate Dr. Velon John yesterday, January 21, 2014.

Brown, who previously told the Court he is a Belonger, was charged with unlawful possession of explosives, unlawful possession of cannabis and being concerned with the supply of a controlled drug.

He was allegedly found with 35 rounds of 9mm ammunition, in addition to 385 grams of cannabis at his home in Belmont Park in West End.

When the trial was expected to begin yesterday against Brown, Magistrate John told the prosecution that the defendant was improperly charged with the possession of explosives.

He noted that there was a fundamental difference in the acts that govern the possession of explosives and possession of firearms and related that there was a clear disparity in the punishment met out by either. Possession of firearms is punishable by a term of 5 years in prison and/or a fine of $5,000.

“If that’s the way you have been handling this thing [offence] from time immemorial, then it is wrong,” Magistrate John said before noting that being charged with the offence of possession of explosives prejudices the defendant in the matter before the Court.

Crown Counsel Herbert Potter, after conferring with Police Officers, told the Court that he would seek advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions on the way to proceed with the matter and asked for an adjournment date for continuation.

Magistrate John argued that based on his ruling, the drug related charges were the only ones to be answered, therefore bail would have to be reduced.

Brown, a construction worker, then had his bail reduced to $30,000 with one signed surety after previously being placed on $75,000 bail with two signed sureties. He had also been required to submit his travel documents and report to the West End Police Station thrice per week.

Brown was asked to return to court on March 4, 2014 when his trial is expected to begin anew.

16 Responses to “Magistrate tosses explosives charge against drug & ammo accused”

  • rattie (22/01/2014, 08:31) Like (5) Dislike (8) Reply
    The bvi justice system is a joke
    • Joker (22/01/2014, 10:35) Like (17) Dislike (0) Reply
      Why, because justice if finally being served the right way and not by the magistrates personal feelings? By Law, possession of a firearm and explosives can be penalized by spending 5 years OR paying a fine of US$5,000. In the past, the magistrate would just lock you up without looking at the circumstances, i think Magistrate John is doing and excellent job. It's about time we get a magistrate that follows the law for what it is instead of passing judgement because of who you are. Keep up the good work Dr. John.
  • Law Man (22/01/2014, 09:42) Like (11) Dislike (1) Reply
    The justice system is not a joke, it is just that the Police needs to charge people for the proper incidents under the right statues accordingly, in the past the court was just doing things randomly without going to the Laws of the Country so they were just going by the feelings of the magistrate presiding on that given day.
    • Hmmmm (26/01/2014, 09:17) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
      Why do you think the police is to be blamed for this? Let me enlightened you on the procedures. First you are arrested, then you are charged. After you are charged the file goes to the DPP office whose responsibilities is to ensure that whatever charges are before the court are correct, because they will have to prosecute the case. The police can only give a charge, but it the is the DPP office who does the prosecution, therefore the onus is on the DPP to ensure that the charges are properly laid according to the Law. In this case the police is blameworthy. The bucks stopped at the DPP office.
  • Concerned (22/01/2014, 10:17) Like (1) Dislike (10) Reply

    By the time this Magistrate is finished, the prison will be empty.

    • Really! (23/01/2014, 17:16) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply

      Why?? Because he isnt being a dumb a$$?! He is doing his job, those who need to go to prison will go. Sending everybody to jail when the Law gives practical guidance. We just want to flex our power and not look at the case in its entirety. We are not to be a lawless society, but sending everyone to jail is just totally foolish. Hardcore and repeat offenders should be punished heavily, and if that means jail, then so be it.

    • wise up (25/01/2014, 05:26) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      set my people free !!!!!!!!
  • foxy (22/01/2014, 10:54) Like (6) Dislike (0) Reply
    The man sharp sir
  • concerned citizen (22/01/2014, 11:12) Like (11) Dislike (1) Reply
    the police themselves dont kno the procedures they are suppose to follow they jus treat ppl as if we're in a capitalist community...
  • question (22/01/2014, 11:13) Like (5) Dislike (0) Reply
    Its harsh where you can do 10 years if I'm in a bad mood or if someone cut me off in traffic or my spouse is stressing me out. Is that what our Countries legal matters are being determined By?
  • Whew (22/01/2014, 12:41) Like (8) Dislike (1) Reply
    Lawd watch eye candy
  • AC 360 (22/01/2014, 12:54) Like (17) Dislike (0) Reply
    Tired of these dumb police being judge, jury and executioner.....I know the job is difficult but why do they not take heir time so they could win in court
  • TUMBAY (22/01/2014, 19:13) Like (6) Dislike (0) Reply
    The BVI justice system has been unfair a very long time this magistrate is the best thing ever happened to the BVI


  • HtuelTuel (23/01/2014, 05:53) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    So the DPP work is not being scruternized here? They must advise the Police whether to charge and what to charge. I may be wrong here I am not big on the process. Wait a minute! The DPP office, officers/prosecutors also get the files and lay them before the court also don't they? Sure they do. It is easy saying popoors, popos, them every time isn't it? Examine yourself cause you got issues.
  • Tinker (23/01/2014, 17:10) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
    Its about time some one with sense came and straightened us out. Charging persons on a whim and emotions cannot stand up indefinitely. Make sure you know the Law, and apply it.

    Thank this Magistrate for attempting to do his job without any bias. Practice Law and not Law Emotions!!


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.