Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

'I would go down fighting against' judge-only trials- Hon Fraser

- Jury Act 2022 will replace archaic legislation that resulted in challenges to jury list & jury selection
Hon Julian Fraser said it would have been something he would go down fighting against as it relates to no-jury trials supported by legislation in the VI. Photo HOA/Youtube
Ahead of today’s reading, the original 1914 bill was part of a court case that resulted in no-Jury trials after the former Director of Public Prosecutions Kim Hollis QC successfully challenged the jury list in court. Photo: VINO/File
Ahead of today’s reading, the original 1914 bill was part of a court case that resulted in no-Jury trials after the former Director of Public Prosecutions Kim Hollis QC successfully challenged the jury list in court. Photo: VINO/File
DUFF’S BOTTOM, Tortola, VI- Legislators in the Virgin Islands are debating the Virgin Islands Jury Act 2022, which is seeking to address several issues with the local jury pool and expand its selection, in addition to bringing reforms in keeping with the Commission of Inquiry (CoI) recommendations.

The bill entered the debate stage on October 18, 2022, during the Continuation of the 7th Sitting of the Fourth Session of the Fourth House of Assembly and was introduced by Premier Dr the Hon Natalio D. Wheatley (R7) and Seconded by Minister for Health and Social Development Hon Marlon A. Penn (R8). 

New bill to replace 1914 act 

The original 1914 bill was part of a court case that resulted in no-Jury trials after the former Director of Public Prosecutions Kim Hollis QC successfully challenged the jury list in court.

Ms Hollis had raised issues with the use of the voter registry to select jurors, which in itself excluded long-term non-belongers. 

According to the report on the deliberations of the Standing Finance Committee (SFC) held between November 20 and 29, 2019 at the Office of the House of Assembly in Road Town, Tortola, Miss Hollis detailed how the selection should be made. 

"The Jury Act advocates that anyone who has been resident of the BVI i.e. an Alien for over 10 years is eligible to serve as a Juror. Additionally, persons between the ages of 21 – 60 are eligible to sit as Jurors on Jury Trials in the BVI," she said. 

However, The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) had been drawing jurors from the list of eligible voters which at the time also excluded long-term non-belongers from ever being selected.

Given that this revealed a fundamental flaw that excluded a large category of residents from becoming jurors in the local court system, a  judge ruled in favor of Ms Hollis and found that the voters' list used for jury selection was actually unconstitutional.

CoI recommendations called for judge-only trials 

CoI Commissioner Sir Gary R. Hickinbottom in his recommendations had also called for greater reforms to the act as well as for judge-only trials to be considered urgently as part of Recommendation B43.

According to the commissioner, “I recommend that consideration is given to revising the Jury Act in two respects. First, consideration should be given to increasing the size of the pool of jurors by (e.g) changing the criteria to enable those who are long-term residents to sit on juries. Second, consideration should be urgently given to granting the court wider powers to hear judge-only criminal trials,” the CoI report detailed. 

Opposition Leader Hon Julian Fraser RA (R3), during yesterday’s debates; however, pointed out that the recommendations were troubling especially as it relates to no-jury trials.

“This piece of legislation appears to me somewhat like a hurricane because I heard about it before I saw it. I heard so much about it.”

Judge only trials 'a horror' - Hon Fraser 

Hon Fraser continued, “And the horror that I heard about this that I was waiting for was trials without a juror or jury and that peaked my ears, Madam Speaker.”

The senior legislator further said, “I was wondering to myself who in their right mind could ever contemplate such a travesty of justice, where a person will be deprived of one of the fundamental cornerstones of justice, which is to be tried by his own peers, a jury of his peers, and turn that responsibility over to a single judge.”

Hon Fraser said it would have been something he would go down fighting against as it related to no-jury trials supported by legislation. 

“But I'm glad that this is not in this bill. I heard the premier mentioned as being part of the recommendations from the Hickinbottom report, it just goes to show, Madam Speaker, the depths to which they were willing to go,” he further added.

22 Responses to “'I would go down fighting against' judge-only trials- Hon Fraser”

  • lodger (19/10/2022, 07:54) Like (26) Dislike (3) Reply
    But its not in the bill. He spent an awful lot of hot air saying he would be against something that is not proposed. However I can see that in this small country there could well be a trial Situation where it would be impossible to get an unbiased or unconnected jury panel, and that the decision of the judge, presumably unbiased, could resolve the outcome.
  • Hot one (19/10/2022, 08:02) Like (7) Dislike (35) Reply
    You only need to look at the behaviours of the Commissioner to see why we should not tolerate judge only trials. He was appointed by the former Governor with a scarcely private mandate to recommend the suspension of the constitution and duly made that recommendation even thought he could not find the evidence to justify it. The UK government saw the put up job and, in an unprecedented manner, rejected the primary recommendation. Please let’s keep jury trials, and never let a tyrant l have his own way again.
  • lol (19/10/2022, 08:06) Like (55) Dislike (4) Reply
    But if you are tried by a jury of your peers that makes it twice as easy to get away if a crime was committed.
  • Joker (19/10/2022, 09:04) Like (36) Dislike (5) Reply
    This joker don't know magistrate court is one person casting judgement. Judge only trials are nothing new across the world. We should consider a three judge system for more serious offences . No relatives or childhood friends who would be conflicted when deciding your faith.
    • No joke (19/10/2022, 09:23) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
      Or people who can be intimidated, cowed or bribed into deciding in your favour. Anyone wonder why so many juries here fail to convict? Same answer as why so many witnesses refuse to testify...
  • @LOL (19/10/2022, 09:05) Like (76) Dislike (2) Reply
    'I would go down fighting against' that hairstyle
  • ......... (19/10/2022, 09:08) Like (5) Dislike (37) Reply
    FRASER FOR PREMIER
  • Yes to UK (19/10/2022, 09:19) Like (17) Dislike (0) Reply
    Julian Fraser, Your time has pass, you need to stay out of this business altogether you are showing it every time you make it to the news, we thought Andrew was bad God see for us if you made it as Premier,
  • help me (19/10/2022, 09:21) Like (7) Dislike (8) Reply
    black man goes before the white judge
  • Scared why ? (19/10/2022, 09:26) Like (1) Dislike (6) Reply
    For years expats have been tried amongst persons not of their piers, no outsiders on the jury list, just a set of one minded set of people……
    The judge alone trials are for high profile cases involving public figures and politicians who has influential sway over the populace so this would be good….

    Fraser the other politicians are also in agreement with you but not as bold to say so….judge only is so your cousin, or sister or niece of distant relative is not on your trial…..

    The place small and you do not want your fate in the hands of an outsider now
  • Cayman (19/10/2022, 10:05) Like (15) Dislike (0) Reply
    The HOA used Cayman's Register of Interest Act to justify not making their interest public without restrictions. Well now use Cayman's laws to also justify judge-only trials which exist under Cayman law. Our very own Justice Madam Pereira spoke recently in support of judge-only trials: https://bvinews.com/bvi-other-ec-supreme-court-members-should-consider-judge-alone-criminal-trials/.

    When it works in their favour, the HOA is quick to quote what is happening elsewhere, and when it does not you hear nothing!

  • facts (19/10/2022, 10:18) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    the prosecution, plays a crucial role at trial
  • Guest (19/10/2022, 12:50) Like (8) Dislike (0) Reply
    “I will go down fighting” I think his hairline shares that same philosophy……..
    • nonsense (19/10/2022, 20:09) Like (0) Dislike (1) Reply
      @Guest the only contribution to the discussion is about a man's hairline.
  • criminal nation (19/10/2022, 13:03) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
    this aint democracy. UK is a democracy. you fools , incl. this wierdo fishbay fraud, are scared to death that the crooked system of buying an easy jury in BVI is imperiled. It doesn't work. you are a state set up so serve criminals. over.
  • @ Guest (19/10/2022, 13:58) Like (6) Dislike (0) Reply
    I LIKE YOUR JOKE ???? ON THE SCB WANNABE PREMIER
  • My Take (19/10/2022, 14:28) Like (0) Dislike (8) Reply
    i agree with the Hon Member. Jury trials are the norm in most democratic countries: not one -judge ones. And individual jurors can, and are often challenged. There is a greater risk of person being partial either way than nine persons. Perhaps a 3-judge system awa as a jury system is the way to go with the former being reserved for extra high profile cases. And please remember the Cayman Islands is'nt necessarily perfect so we don't necessarily have to follow in their footsteps

  • Reality check (19/10/2022, 15:59) Like (8) Dislike (0) Reply
    Fraser just scared that he won't be judged by his cronies and family members when he ends up in court answering for the 7.5 million missing from the SCB development project.
  • Loose mouth (19/10/2022, 20:22) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    I am not a fan of Judge only criminal trials but it is something that other Judiciaries around the world have implementing or are considering. Here in the BVI the pool of potential jurors are taken from the electoral list. In a small community where everyone knows everyone or are related in some way that could or has been a problem. Some Jurors have in the past have been threatened, intimidated on their own reached a particular verdict based on who the accused or the victim then have to live in the same community or in some cases work with relatives and friends of the persons they just acquitted or convict for a criminal offence. Most of these Judges are brought in to preside over criminal matters. They have no personal connections with the accused person and do not have to live in our community after reaching any verdict in a particular case. The accused person still retain the right to appeal any decision reached by the judge. Most of our local Lawyers are refusing to prosecute and rather prefer to defend or avoid criminal cases on a whole. As a Legislator, the Hon. Minister should look at the pros and cons of Judge only trials VS trial by Judge and jury and not just talk because he is on the opposition.
  • Well (20/10/2022, 09:28) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Down you will go.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.