‘Health infastructure & derelicts' are priorities for Health Ministry- Hon Vincent O. Wheatley
Honourable Wheatley stated that these priorities are the progress in advancing health infrastructure and the government's approach to addressing the issue of derelicts.
Health Infrastructure & Derelicts
Speaking with Information Officer Fitsroy Randell ahead of the address, Honourable Wheatley stated that he is eager to hear the Premier highlight the achievements, initiatives, and policies that have contributed to the work of his ministry.
“The ministry is a very large ministry, and we have so many subjects that we deal with. What I'm looking forward to most of all is the progress that we are making in healthcare infrastructure. Also, what are we going to do with the derelicts,” he said
Honourable Wheatley emphasised that these are the top topics he wants the Premier to discuss regarding the Ministry of Health and Social Development. He also expressed a desire for the Premier to highlight changes made through social protection policies, social development, and system grants, noting, “We are doing for all our vulnerable groups in the Virgin Islands.”
The State of the Territory Address is scheduled for Tuesday, June 9, 2026, at Noel Lloyd Positive Action Movement Park in Road Town at 4:00 PM.
.jpg)
.png)
.jpg)
Follow Us On
13 Responses to “‘Health infastructure & derelicts' are priorities for Health Ministry- Hon Vincent O. Wheatley ”
I agree with Raw et al. The NHI system has enabled certain families to abuse the system. We are given very few options, and due to specific restrictions, the hospital continues to deteriorate while the Purple P continues to thrive. Why? Because almost all physicians here work there! A hospital of this size and serving such a large population should naturally have multiple specialists available. However, regulations prevent more than one specialist in a given field from practicing in the country. So the question is: who employs nearly all of these specialists? The answer is obvious. While the public hospital struggles, the Purple P benefits from a concentration of specialist services, leaving patients with limited choices and weakening the public healthcare system.
In my view, this situation reflects a clear conflict of interest and leaves patients with few meaningful alternatives. This is not a criticism of our GPs as many are dedicated professionals who provide excellent care. However, the system's structure raises serious questions about whose interests are prioritized.
The NHI scheme has, in practice, concentrated healthcare access around a single provider, the Purple P. Rather than creating a competitive environment that expands patient choice, it has limited options and increased dependence on one dominant institution. For many patients, the provider they are effectively directed toward is also the most expensive, making the promise of accessible healthcare difficult to reconcile with reality.
Obtaining a second opinion should be a routine part of quality healthcare. Instead, many patients feel as though they need entirely separate insurance coverage to access alternative specialist care. At the same time, a limited number of physicians are expected to carry an increasing workload, while patients face restricted choices and uneven access to services. I have seen some exceptional doctors here, but far too many are overwhelmed by patient loads they simply cannot sustain. They are working to the point of exhaustion, struggling to meet appointments and demands that no reasonable system should place on a limited number of professionals. My concern is not only for the quality of care patients receive, but also for the doctors themselves.
The result is a system that many believe has weakened competition, reduced patient autonomy, and contributed to declining confidence in healthcare delivery. Rather than expanding access and improving outcomes, it has left many people feeling locked into a model that offers limited choice and questionable value. The challenges become even more apparent when patients seek approval for overseas treatment. For those requiring specialized care unavailable locally, the process can be difficult, slow, and uncertain. In the eyes of many patients, this represents one of the most significant shortcomings of NHI.