Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

Harrigan Estate man wins more than $30K in Wrongful Arrest, Unlawful Search case

- Case was between Damion A. Morgan & Attorney General with the RVIPF
A Harrigan Estate man, Damion A. Morgan has won more than $30k in a High Court case against the Attorney General with the Royal Virgin Islands Police Force (RVIPF) as subject, where Morgan as claimant sought federal and special vindicatory damages against the defenders for Unlawful Search, Wrongful Arrest, False Imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. Photo: VINO/File
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI – A Harrigan Estate man, Damion A. Morgan, has won more than $30, 000.00 in a High Court case against the Attorney General with the Royal Virgin Islands Police Force (RVIPF) as Subject. Morgan, as Claimant, sought federal and special vindicatory damages against the defenders for Unlawful Search, Wrongful Arrest, False Imprisonment, and malicious prosecution.

He also sought pre-judgment interest from August 6, 2018, to the day of Judgement at the rates of 3% per annum/or such rate and for such period as the court deems just.

Baby taken on rainy night from Festival Village

According to the judgement seen by Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) and published yesterday, Friday, February 23, 2023, Morgan had seen his young baby in the care of a friend of the baby's mother, Chrystal Mitchell, at the Festival Village in the late evening of August 2018.

He then decided to take the baby home with him as he was concerned about the baby being out in the condition; however, did not communicate his decision to the baby’s mother, which resulted in an argument between the two at his home.

The judgment added that Ms Mitchell contacted Morgan and then went to the apartment to uplift the baby; however, he refused to let her have the child. 

He said police later contacted him by telephone informing him of a report by Ms Mitchell that he has the baby; however, he informed the police that he was the father and would return the child in the morning since the said baby was asleep.

Police arrive at apartment to uplift baby 

Mogan said as the father, he had a right to remove the baby from the Festival Village given the conditions at the time. However,  around 2:00 AM later that evening, a team of officers arrived at his apartment and banged on the door and, before he could open it, broke into the apartment and eventually removed the sleeping baby from him.

The police, when questioned, said they did not need a warrant for their entry and would show him ‘how the law works’. The police officers also did not have a court order to remove the baby from his care and the claimant testified that he also did not hear the police vehicle or call-out by the police officers for him to open the door.

The Claimant further reported that the police broke into his home, had the baby taken and he was then pulled out of his apartment, slammed against his car, handcuffed and transported to the Road Town Police Station where he was not told about the reasons for his arrest.

The judgement added that at the station, the claimant was told he did not ‘push out any child’ and as such, had no right to decide to take a child home with him the night. The incident at the home was witnessed by the Claimant’s brother and a female companion in the living room.

Police said they took action based on the situation 

Police in their defence said they entered the home out of the urgency of the situation and on suspicion that the claimant may have been intoxicated based on reports from the baby’s mother that he was drunk. The police also charged him with common assault, based on claims of the baby's mother. 

Morgan was subsequently prosecuted at the Magistrate’s Court; however, the matter was eventually discontinued by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions.

As part of the judgement, Judge Heather Felix-Evans ultimately ruled that the claimant should receive US $7500 in damages for unlawful search, US $20,000 for wrongful arrest or false imprisonment, US $5000 for malicious prosecution and nominal damage for legal fees at the sum of US $1,500.

Pre-judgement interest was awarded on the global sum from August 2018 to the date of judgement at a rate of 3% per annum. He is also expected to receive Statutory interest at a rate of 5% per annum from the date of judgement, along with the prescribed cost. 

Mr Jamal Smith and Ms Crustal McKenzie were Counsels for the claimants and the Attorney General was represented by Nicosie R. Drummett as Principal Crown Counsel/Counsel for the defendant.

The judgement comes as the Caucasian UK police officers currently in the VI have allegedly been going around and arresting public residents, unlawfully entering their homes without warrants and ceasing property belonging to residents in a similar fashion.

Many of those persons arrested have been released without charges.

16 Responses to “Harrigan Estate man wins more than $30K in Wrongful Arrest, Unlawful Search case”

  • Rubber Duck (25/02/2023, 12:57) Like (12) Dislike (2) Reply
    Hope this is a listen for those white police officers
  • whity (25/02/2023, 12:59) Like (11) Dislike (0) Reply
    The police have move of these coming
  • Last Paragraph (25/02/2023, 13:01) Like (7) Dislike (0) Reply
    yes but they are arresting and taking electronic devices to make charges later , thats the reason and you all know it
    • Madussa (26/02/2023, 01:03) Like (9) Dislike (0) Reply
      If the stupid mother had allowed the father to take his child to his house because of the weather and late time, she could have stayed there with friends the way she wanted to anyway. She put their child's health at risk being in the bad weather anyway. She was just being spiteful and ignorant.
  • WOW (25/02/2023, 13:05) Like (22) Dislike (0) Reply
    We live in a Banana Republic. He need more than 30k those officers need to be fired.
  • Damion (25/02/2023, 13:39) Like (30) Dislike (2) Reply
    Make sure the baby mother dont spend a penny of your awarded cash
  • Ken P (25/02/2023, 14:00) Like (18) Dislike (0) Reply
    I am happy about this judgement and hope that a message is sent to police officers to do there jobs with tact, understanding, care and proper investigation.
  • kkk (25/02/2023, 15:09) Like (7) Dislike (0) Reply
    Hope the uk police officers seeing this article
  • 2023 (25/02/2023, 16:28) Like (8) Dislike (1) Reply
    now wonder there is a new police bill: lets not forget the old slavery day
  • Intel Analysis (25/02/2023, 20:31) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
    The Police was at fault.
  • Me (25/02/2023, 20:49) Like (10) Dislike (0) Reply
    Wow! These police officers acted like brutal people. Listen to the words they said. "They would show him how the law works" I'm so glad he won this matter. DPP needs to do better with these police cases as the Government got more money to lose....watch and see...
  • Arrion (26/02/2023, 01:00) Like (8) Dislike (0) Reply
    The mother was an IDIOT for having the child out that time of night and in that weather. The father was right to take the child to his home. Some of these mothers don't need children and the fathers are better parents than these hair weave wearing, fake eyebrows, fake eyelashes, fake fingernails, and bleached skin so-called mothers. I hope for all of the father's trouble, she is not entitled to a penny of his money for suffering and mistreatment because of her.
  • The watchdog (26/02/2023, 21:38) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    See why we can’t give these white uk officers any more power
  • Wonderful (27/02/2023, 10:07) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    i am happy he won.

    to the child mother you need to be lock up for allowing all of this happen to your child father who by my eyes was doing the right thing. you wanted to have fun you chould have just let him keep the baby for the night then next day collect your child simple.

    my baby daddy would have never did that so be happy you have a good one.
  • Well Well (03/03/2023, 08:01) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Well if the new police act gets pass this behavior by the police will be come the new normal. Door replacing going to be a booming business in the BVI. The police guns will be point at your children as they bust into your homes on a simple hint suspicion.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.