Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

Constitutional Review public consultation was a ‘flawed process’- Hon Fraser

Deputy Premier Hon Julian Fraser, RA (R3) has said the public consultation process for reviewing the Territory’s constitution was flawed. Photo: CRC
Scenes from the Constutition Review Commission's community meeting at the Francis Lettsome Primary School in January 2023. Photo: CRC
Scenes from the Constutition Review Commission's community meeting at the Francis Lettsome Primary School in January 2023. Photo: CRC
Deputy Premier and Minister for Environment, Natural Resources and Climate Change, Hon Julian Fraser, RA (R3), during the Ninth Sitting of the Second Session of the Fifth House of Assembly on Thursday, September 18, 2025. Photo: YouTube/HoA
Deputy Premier and Minister for Environment, Natural Resources and Climate Change, Hon Julian Fraser, RA (R3), during the Ninth Sitting of the Second Session of the Fifth House of Assembly on Thursday, September 18, 2025. Photo: YouTube/HoA
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI- Deputy Premier and veteran legislator Hon Julian Fraser, RA (R3) has boldly stated that the public consultation process for reviewing the Territory’s constitution was flawed.

Hon Fraser made this damning accusation while giving his contributions in the House of Assembly on the 2022-2023 Constitution Reform Commission (CRC) Report, during the Ninth Sitting of the Second Session of the Fifth House of Assembly on Thursday, September 18, 2025. 

The Minister for Environment, Natural Resources and Climate Change said, according to the report, one of the topics that drew several comments from the public was the At Large system.

This report was laid in the HoA on January 31, 2024. 

A “flawed” process

"This is what the report is saying, Madam Speaker…and that was a need to review the At Large system, and I want to say this also about the process: Madam Speaker, the process was flawed. It was a flawed process.”

Hon Fraser further accused the public consultation process by the Constitutional Review Committee of being flawed. 

“Why was this flawed?… Anyone who appeared in any of those meetings or anyone who was ambitious enough to submit to make a submission, whether in writing or verbally, was to be heard and whatever their submission was, was to be taken seriously, and it had equal weight, no matter where you’re from, no matter who you are, no matter your gender or whatever.”

Who are these people? 

Hon Fraser went on to say that anyone could have walked into these public consultations and given their opinions, as there was no way to “discriminate” between locals, foreigners, visitors or people who just wandered in but had no right to be there. 

“Who are these people? I’m not making this stuff up, Madam Speaker, this is possible…So how could this be considered anything but flawed?”

5 Responses to “Constitutional Review public consultation was a ‘flawed process’- Hon Fraser”

  • son of the soil (22/09/2025, 10:21) Like (1) Dislike (8) Reply
    I agree wid Fraser
  • Racism (22/09/2025, 11:44) Like (3) Dislike (2) Reply
    For all to see
    • Very Sloppy! (22/09/2025, 12:16) Like (0) Dislike (6) Reply
      Fraser is correct. You might have been on vacation, sat in on one of the public consultation meetings about the VI Constitution, expressed your views, and never return to these lands. This is incorrect and reflects inadequate processing of the VI's constitutional affairs.
  • BuzzBvi (22/09/2025, 12:43) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    Not as flawed as the Traffic Lights on the Roundabout or the Money for Brothers Harbour Project or the Barber Shop Experiment or the I can't decide which political party I am in till I see the money flaw.
  • Atendee (22/09/2025, 12:46) Like (0) Dislike (1) Reply
    This reader is curious if Fraser bothered to attend any of the meetings or offer and written submissions himself? I rather doubt he bothered...


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.