Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

‘Birth tourism' violates US Immigration law & will not be permitted- US Embassy

The United States Embassy in Bridgetown, Barbados, has issued a renewed advisory to Caribbean nationals regarding the misuse of non-immigrant visas, particularly in relation to 'birth tourism'. Photo: US Embassy
A view of Road Town, Tortola. Many in the Virgin Islands, locals and expatriates, are known to prefer to have their babies born in the US, including due to healthcare concerns. Photo: VINO/File
A view of Road Town, Tortola. Many in the Virgin Islands, locals and expatriates, are known to prefer to have their babies born in the US, including due to healthcare concerns. Photo: VINO/File
BRIDGETOWN, Barbados- The United States Embassy in Bridgetown, Barbados, has issued a renewed advisory to Caribbean nationals regarding the misuse of non-immigrant visas, particularly in relation to “birth tourism.”

The Embassy emphasises that using a B-1/B-2 visitor visa to enter the United States primarily for the purpose of giving birth—thereby securing US citizenship for the child—is a violation of US immigration law and will not be permitted.

Many in the Virgin Islands, locals and expatriates, are known to prefer to have their babies born in the US, including due to healthcare concerns.

According to the US Embassy in Barbados, the advisory reiterates long-standing policy reinforced by a regulation implemented by the US Department of State on January 24, 2020, which directs consular officers to deny tourist visa applications when there is reason to believe the primary purpose of travel is to give birth in the United States to obtain US citizenship for the child.

Birth tourism a ‘misuse of the visa category’

It said that while travel to the United States for tourism and legitimate medical care is permitted under the B-1/B-2 visa, the US government considers birth tourism a misuse of the visa category. Individuals suspected of engaging in this practice may be denied entry, have their visas revoked, or face future ineligibility for US visas.

Birth tourism has raised national security and immigration concerns in the United States for several years. It is estimated that tens of thousands of babies are born each year to mothers who enter the country on tourist visas.

The US government said it remains committed to preserving the integrity of its immigration system and preventing the exploitation of the Fourteenth Amendment, which grants birthright citizenship to those born on US soil.

The advisory serves as a reminder that visa applicants must disclose the true purpose of their travel and comply with all US immigration rules. It said misrepresentation may lead to serious consequences, including permanent ineligibility for US visas.

The Embassy encourages all Caribbean nationals to review visa guidelines carefully and to ensure their travel intentions are consistent with the visa category for which they are applying.

13 Responses to “‘Birth tourism' violates US Immigration law & will not be permitted- US Embassy”

  • Interested (06/06/2025, 12:35) Like (5) Dislike (1) Reply
    They have spoken Who have ears to hear, let them hear
  • BRAD BOYNES (06/06/2025, 14:48) Like (8) Dislike (3) Reply
    Many in the Virgin Islands, locals and expatriates, are known to prefer to have their babies born in the US, including due to healthcare concerns.
    This will never stop. The US done let it got out of hand. The BVI and other Caribbean nations/countries the same dam thing.
    • Correct (06/06/2025, 18:35) Like (2) Dislike (1) Reply
      A lot of doctors here are also the reasons people have still birth, miscarriages, undiagnosed issues etc. USA is one of the safest and experienced place to get a child.
  • Boom! (06/06/2025, 15:22) Like (6) Dislike (0) Reply
    That door just got shut.
  • Greg (06/06/2025, 16:04) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
    That's how it is now, but our parents had us in the U.S.V.I. and then came back over on the boat to the B.V.I.. We were deemed U.S. citizens immediately at birth, but still had Belonger status in the B.V.I. The newbies won't have it so easy now. We were born in the best of times.
  • Orange man not playing. (06/06/2025, 16:26) Like (4) Dislike (2) Reply
    Ya’ll think trump playing games. Immigration officers will be sending people back very quickly.
    • @Orange man not playing (06/06/2025, 17:59) Like (36) Dislike (2) Reply
      Let them continue with this practice because DJT will soon start demanding pregnancy test for women between a certain age travelling to the US on B1/B2 Tourist Visas or ICE might be waiting to deport you upon delivery of baby. Both mother and child packed back on ICE flight and Visa revoked for the Mother whilst baby refused automatic US Citizenship. The Mother might even be jailed whilst baby is placed in foster care, if the Mother has no relatives who has US legal status and is willing to take charge of the child. Alu know DJT is ignorant and crazy. He does whatever his mind tells him. He doesn't give a damn about anybody but himself, family and some of his ctoonies. Look how him and first buddy, Elon Musk fall out now trading war of words on the platform X. Some people will be lucky if that nincompoop doesn't use the chance to have them sent to CECOT. Will all this worth it? Nope, it will not. So be forewarned and drop you lil picknie down Peebles. Don't even try that sh*t at Roy Schneider. They already have the spare room to keep you when ICE ready to collect you and your bundle of joy. Stay your behind in Tola. Btw, its not only BVIslanders/Belongers and Caribbean people rushing to the US to give birth, lots of the expats from the Asia and Europe has taken up the practice as well. The Filipinos rushing there in droves to drop their bundle and we know they breed like rabbits.
      • c (06/06/2025, 20:05) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
        The mother leaves with the baby but the baby can return when 18 since the baby was born on US soil
  • @least (06/06/2025, 17:46) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    If your children was born in the USVI, Puerto Rico or the US, they stand a better chance.
  • Eldread (06/06/2025, 18:32) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
    Even natalio Wheatley parents birth him in USA territory, so our premiere is a American, I have no problem with what trump is saying here, be proud of the lands you are birth on.
  • BuzzBvi (06/06/2025, 20:32) Like (3) Dislike (1) Reply
    We going to get a lot more Born Here VI babies and less of those American made VIslanders folks complaining about up in Anegada taking over the place.
    Maybe a good thing bringing back made and produced in the VI. Well maybe not even made in the VI but produced in the VI.
    VI probably does need to move away from the made somewhere, produced in the USA but vote in the VI model of VIslander that is starting to upset some folks.
    I am sure it makes sense to the people who have lived here, work here, play here, are invested here, pay tax here, and have no say, but are living under Governments voted in by people who born in the US, live somewhere else, use their paid for education somewhere else, farmers and fishers grants spent somewhere else, taxes paid somewhere else, money spent somewhere else, skills used somewhere eilse, focus is somewhere else .... it gets you thinking.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.