Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

Another blow to the DPP! Marley Sebastien freed on all charges

Greenland resident and Dominica native, Marley Sebastien, who was also part of former Premier Andrew A. Fahie's security detail, has been freed of the charges of Perjury and Perverting the Course of Justice. Photo: Team of Reporters
It was yet another loss for the Office of the DPP and Mr Sandip Patel, KC, who was hired by the DPP to prosecute a number of high-profile cases but has seen little success. Photo: 33 Bedford Row
It was yet another loss for the Office of the DPP and Mr Sandip Patel, KC, who was hired by the DPP to prosecute a number of high-profile cases but has seen little success. Photo: 33 Bedford Row
Mr Marley Sebastien was represented by Valston M. Graham (in photo), a former Director of Public Prosecutions with the Government of St Kitts and Nevis and a former Senior Crown Counsel with the Government of the Virgin Islands. Photo: Facebook/File
Mr Marley Sebastien was represented by Valston M. Graham (in photo), a former Director of Public Prosecutions with the Government of St Kitts and Nevis and a former Senior Crown Counsel with the Government of the Virgin Islands. Photo: Facebook/File
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI- It was in 2022 that Greenland resident and Dominica native, Marley Sebastien, who was also part of former Premier Andrew A. Fahie's security detail, was charged with Perjury and Perverting the Course of Justice.

A preliminary trial was held, and the case was thrown out of the courts when Sebastien appeared before Magistrate Khadeen Palmer on March 3, 2022; however, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) reinstituted the charges in the High Court.

Not Guilty!

When the case was called today, March 18, 2026, Sebastien’s lawyer, Valston M. Graham, a former Director of Public Prosecutions with the Government of St Kitts and Nevis and a former Senior Crown Counsel with the Government of the Virgin Islands, told the judge that Mr Sebastien had no case to answer.

After the summation by the King’s Counsel, Sandip Patel, Justice Akilah Anderson directed the jury to return a not guilty verdict.

Following the verdict, Mr Sebastien could not hold back his tears.

VI taxpayers under pressure

It was yet another loss for the Office of the DPP and Mr Patel, who was hired by the DPP to prosecute a number of high-profile cases but has seen little success.

Some of the cases Mr Patel has prosecuted included those against Honourable Myron V. Walwyn (R6), Lorna Stevens, Wade N. Smith, Pamphil Prevost, Simon Powers, and Najan Christopher.

Many critics have accused the Office of the DPP of using the law as a weapon against people who speak out for justice and do not go along with some of the inconsistencies of the governor.

It is important to note that the accused Virgin Islanders cannot bring a class action lawsuit against the UK police officers, the governor or any Commission of Inquiry (CoI) official as they have been immune from prosecution by the UK parliament.

This means taxpayers will have to absorb millions of dollars in lawsuits from these cases, which many have labelled as “bogus”.

28 Responses to “Another blow to the DPP! Marley Sebastien freed on all charges”

  • Isaiah 54:17 (NIV) (18/03/2026, 14:59) Like (15) Dislike (4) Reply
    NO weapon forged against you will prevail, and you will refute every tongue that accuses you. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and this is their vindication from me,” declares the LORD.
    • Fire the DPP (18/03/2026, 20:17) Like (10) Dislike (2) Reply
      The woman is hopeless and needs to be fired asap.
    • Hot one (19/03/2026, 19:05) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
      This case was commenced, with a huge amount of publicity, by the DPP before the verdict was delivered in the other criminal trial in which Office Sebastian was giving evidence. The publicity was clearly and obviously intended to influence the jury in the other criminal trial, but the defendants in that trial were acquitted because the DPP failed to produce any evidence which could convict them – they were released at half time.
      This prosecution was also hopeless, and the DPP has failed to get past half time yet again.
      Judging how she has previously reacted, she will appeal this latest humiliation and suffer more humiliation in the Court of Appeal.
      All at the tax payers expense.
      How much more of her incompetency do we have to suffer.
  • tola (18/03/2026, 16:08) Like (4) Dislike (2) Reply
    Well sah
  • Reitred officer (18/03/2026, 16:15) Like (25) Dislike (1) Reply
    Please,please please.
    I will like the person or persons who ever will be following this matter to understand that in the first place there was not one thread of evidence against Sebastián.
    The Judge in the case in which the DPP is alledging that the officer ( Sebastián ) committed those offences already said that absolutely ,Sebastián did not commit any offence. He went on to say ,"well why the other witnesses that gave evidence in the same matter as Sebastián were not charge as well'.
    Sebastián must bring a Law Suit aganst the DPP personally for Malicious Prosection.
    My God. Governor please please please for heaven sake,feelings are not what you use in court to get a conviction.
    You bring evidence. So can you please get rid of her or It's because she is doing you all dirty job. It's a blatant shame and embarasment on the judicial service in the BVIs
  • WOW (18/03/2026, 16:22) Like (0) Dislike (1) Reply
    Hmmmm
  • lk (18/03/2026, 16:29) Like (11) Dislike (5) Reply
    What's the surprise it all boil down to money talk and bull sh*it walk simple
  • The real problem (18/03/2026, 17:31) Like (22) Dislike (13) Reply
    The real problem is not the ddp, is the evidence presented to the ddp.. these officers need to be under investigation for how they handled the cases and the evidence. Or maybe bring in UK officers
    • @therealproblem (18/03/2026, 22:16) Like (13) Dislike (2) Reply
      Don’t be ignorant. The DPP is the only one who weighs the evidence and takes a matter to court. She I the one who says there is sufficient evidence or go back to the drawing board and do some more investigation. It is 100% he call as she has said on numerous occasions.

      And if I was that QC I would lead the to believe there was a case how else would he get paid!? You think he did it out of the goodness of his heart. Please!!!
    • @ the real problem (18/03/2026, 22:17) Like (17) Dislike (1) Reply
      Even if the officers presents evidence to the DPP its her job to comb through it to see if there's actually case to bring before the courts or even charge someone. So yes she gets the full blunt of the blame.
  • de silent one (18/03/2026, 17:39) Like (11) Dislike (3) Reply
    Wow! Another one down, there's another high profile police case pending. Aren't this DPP have no shame to see enough is enough in the lost bracket, unless she have an agenda to get the record for loses
  • bvibuzz (18/03/2026, 19:24) Like (6) Dislike (5) Reply
    Uk officers need to stop their nasty racism
  • money (18/03/2026, 21:26) Like (5) Dislike (2) Reply
    Law suit incoming
  • another (19/03/2026, 01:06) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    So what’s new ?
  • island man (19/03/2026, 05:00) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    In this case it was not the police who presented the case and told the police to charge having no regards to the fact that the trial judge said Sebastien’ did not not lie
  • S Pope (19/03/2026, 06:30) Like (7) Dislike (0) Reply
    A preliminary trial was held, and the case was thrown out of the courts when Sebastien appeared before Magistrate Khadeen Palmer on March 3, 2022; however, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) reinstituted the charges in the High Court. Andy don't know what she is doing, but Tiffy is worse. If the Magistrate throw out the case for lack of evidence like what she did in the Myron and Naja case, why t.f did tiffy thought the Andy in the High court was going to find enough evidence for a conviction? Tiffi needs to be replaced ASAP.
  • Mr. Pope (19/03/2026, 06:33) Like (2) Dislike (13) Reply
    Another thing is them doen Island police officers will do anything to protect their own. Even if they have to lie under oath,destroy evidence, refuse to show uo to court, etc etc
  • .... (19/03/2026, 08:06) Like (11) Dislike (0) Reply
    take ur back pay and resign king they aintn goign watch u the same again
  • Silent Majority (19/03/2026, 09:21) Like (3) Dislike (2) Reply
    Has Mr Patel KC won a single hearing yet?
  • Demonic Cat (19/03/2026, 09:21) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Wouldn’t have happened with me in charge!
  • Lucky Star (19/03/2026, 09:35) Like (1) Dislike (5) Reply
    Good.Now he can pay me
  • ???????? (19/03/2026, 10:50) Like (2) Dislike (5) Reply
    Yea that voodoo strong
  • guy hill (19/03/2026, 15:51) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
    Facts do not care about your feelings. Hope they get it right one day.
  • asura (19/03/2026, 17:33) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
    Now let’s get the man back to work
  • Observer (19/03/2026, 20:11) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    Ms Scattliffe getting blame but there is a Patel from the UK in the office calling the shots. Who is paying this guy salary? He can’t win a case but getting a hefty pay check. Ms Scatliffe if the police doesn’t bring the evidence then don’t send any case forward. Advil have some UK officers working in that area and they are a waste of time.
  • Defense Attorney (20/03/2026, 06:33) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
    For those who are not familiar with the functioning of the Police and the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) office, allow me to clarify. The police are responsible for handling reports and carrying out investigations. Once they complete their work, they present any evidence they have gathered to the DPP, who decides if there is "sufficient" evidence to bring the accused to trial. If the evidence is lacking or needs further development, the DPP may advise to "get more and come again." If she determines that there is enough evidence, she will instruct to "charge" the accused. When a case goes to court, it is based on the DPP's confidence that there is adequate evidence for prosecution. Ultimately, if the case is dismissed in court, the DPP is accountable; the responsibility lies with her. The tendency to blame the police for any shortcomings on the part of the DPP should end. If the DPP believes there is insufficient evidence, she should refrain from filing charges. Conversely, if she believes the evidence is strong enough to proceed and the case fails, the police should not be held responsible. It's as straightforward as that.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.