Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

UPDATE: Warrant issued for JVD man after guilty plea

- Court to proceed with Newton hearing
Selvin Chinnery pleaded guilty to being armed with an offensive weapon but told the court he fired a nail gun at another man in self defence. Photo: VINO
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI – Senior Magistrate Tamia Richards declined to stay her hand in issuing a bench warrant for Selvin Chinnery at the request of his attorney when told that he was absent for a hearing in his matter yesterday, September 13, 2013.

Chinnery, 42, of Jost Van Dyke pleaded guilty to being armed with an offensive weapon but told the court he had fired the weapon in self defence after the Virtual Complainant (VC) allegedly tried to run him over with his own car.

According to the allegations, Chinnery had discussion with the VC in the matter in relation to having his [Chinnery’s] car sold and the VC reportedly drove off with his car after he told him not to and Chinnery allegedly fired the nail gun in his direction.

The prosecution, represented by Senior Crown Counsel Valston Graham and defence, represented by attorney Marie Lou Creque were at first scheduled to embark on a Newton hearing after the prosecution declined to accept the facts as given by the defendant during a previous hearing.

A Newtown hearing occurs if, following a guilty plea, the factual dispute between prosecution and defence versions is so different that it affects the appropriate sentence in the case. The court must then hear evidence on the disputed points.

The Newton hearing is similar in form to a mini-trial. The prosecution is first required to call evidence in relation to the matters in dispute, and the defence will then call evidence to support its version of the facts. The burden of proof lies upon the prosecution, which must prove its assertions of fact beyond reasonable doubt.

Graham at first declined to proceed with the hearing but after Magistrate Richards indicated that there was continued disagreement with the facts, he conceded that it was a necessary course of action. “There is no purpose going back and forth, let’s set a date for the Newton hearing and proceed from there,” Graham stated.

The matter will next be heard on October 14, 2013.

See previous story posted July 22, 2013:

JVD man allegedly shoots at other with nail gun

- tells court act was done in self defence

ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI – Selvin Chinnery, 42, told the Magistrate’s Court on July 19, 2013 that he shot at a man with a nail gun because the man had tried to run him over with his own car.

The defendant, a resident of Jost Van Dyke, pleaded guilty to being armed with an offensive weapon. He was represented by attorney Marie Lou Creque.

According to the allegations, Chinnery had discussion with the Virtual Complainant (VC) in the matter in relation to having his (Chinnery) car sold and the VC reportedly drove off with his car after he told him not to and Chinnery allegedly fired the nail gun in his direction.

A report was later made to Police and the defendant allegedly informed officers that he threw away the nail gun. Charges were later brought against him.

The VC was reportedly charged separately in the matter.

Senior Magistrate Tamia Richards commented that the defendant likes things with triggers when Senior Crown Counsel Valston Graham announced that something was known against the defendant. According to court records, Chinnery had a previous conviction for keeping a firearm without a licence.

Creque told the court in mitigation that the defendant readily confessed his role in the affair.

Chinnery then stated, “I’m not saying that I was right for firing the nail gun.” He then explained that the VC took his vehicle, drove off and spun it around and headed straight for his direction.

He further alleged that the VC stopped speaking to him because he (VC) wanted him to sign a paper that allowed him (VC) to go with the defendant’s vehicle but he refused.

The prosecution said it would not accept the defendant’s version of events as his statement indicated that he should have pleaded not guilty instead. “There is a line of defence open to Mr Chinnery,” Graham stated.

The matter was adjourned for a decision on September 13, 2013.

9 Responses to “UPDATE: Warrant issued for JVD man after guilty plea”

  • JVD (22/07/2013, 16:10) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Look troube for me!
  • Disgusted (22/07/2013, 17:23) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
    so you take off with someones car, like you're stealing it, and then head straight for the owner/victim
    of the crime - and when they take action, THEY are in the wrong? That is one failed 'justice' system in
    BVI! Self defense is illegal? Such crap! The BVI judiciary and government ought to be ashamed of
    itself. People have the right to defend themselves. That is one legitimate reason to own a real gun.
    Sheesh!
    • What? (16/09/2013, 09:10) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      Yes this is truly unfair but he can't claim self defense when he wasn't in any danger or in fear of his life. learn the legal term for self denfense.
  • dem say (22/07/2013, 19:11) Like (0) Dislike (1) Reply
    Banning of gun men coming from JVD is the best law the we can implement
  • the rock (23/07/2013, 17:50) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    selly this is not like u..but hey sh.. happens!
  • look before you leap (27/07/2013, 07:20) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Disgusted work on your comprehension!!! That is what Selvin said. That is his story. It has not been proven to be true. Wait for the facts before you lecture.
  • > (14/09/2013, 10:15) Like (4) Dislike (14) Reply
    he has a big Nose may bouy
  • Jvd girl (14/09/2013, 15:53) Like (0) Dislike (15) Reply
    thoes Chinnrey boys are always in melee maybe its the JVD water


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.