Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

‘Protect the minority indigenous people’- Dr. Pickering cries out

Dr Pickering was speaking during the budget debate on December 16, 2014. Photo: VINO/File
Minister for Education and Culture Hon Myron V. Walwyn is a non-indigenous Virgin Islander as he was born in the VI to parents from outside of the Territory. Youth leader, political activist and businessman Rajah A. Smith is an indigenous Virgin Islander as he, his parents and grandparents are born in the VI. Photo: VINO/File
Minister for Education and Culture Hon Myron V. Walwyn is a non-indigenous Virgin Islander as he was born in the VI to parents from outside of the Territory. Youth leader, political activist and businessman Rajah A. Smith is an indigenous Virgin Islander as he, his parents and grandparents are born in the VI. Photo: VINO/File
Eighth District Representative Hon Marlon A. Penn is an indigenous Virgin Islander unlike Speaker of the House of Assembly Ingrid A. Moses whose parents and grandparents were not born in the VI although she was born here. Photo: VINO/File
Eighth District Representative Hon Marlon A. Penn is an indigenous Virgin Islander unlike Speaker of the House of Assembly Ingrid A. Moses whose parents and grandparents were not born in the VI although she was born here. Photo: VINO/File
While First Lady Mrs Lorna G. Smith is a legal resident with full rights, she is not an indigenous Virgin Islander as is Natalio D. Wheatley, who was born in the VI as were his parents and grandparents. Photo: VINO/File
While First Lady Mrs Lorna G. Smith is a legal resident with full rights, she is not an indigenous Virgin Islander as is Natalio D. Wheatley, who was born in the VI as were his parents and grandparents. Photo: VINO/File
Hon Julian Fraser Ra (R3) called for a harmonious society where the rights of all are respected. Photo: VINO/File
Hon Julian Fraser Ra (R3) called for a harmonious society where the rights of all are respected. Photo: VINO/File
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI - The 2010 Virgin Islands Population and Housing Census Report just released a few weeks ago by the National Democratic Party (NDP) Regime after three long years has confirmed what many Virgin Islanders believed to be so: that people born in the Virgin Islands are now a minority in their homeland.

According to the report the population of the Virgin Islands (VI) is approximately 29,000 with 39.1% of the population being born in the VI and some 60.9% born outside of the Territory.

However, it is important to note the difference between locals meaning persons born in the VI and indigenous Virgin Islanders.

Who is an Indigenous Virgin Islander?

There is a clear distinction in the Virgin Islands (VI) between an indigenous Virgin Islander and a Virgin Islander, however under our constitution they have equal rights. Indigenous Virgin Islanders are persons who are not only born in the VI, but can trace at least one of their parents and grandparents to being born in the VI.

Those born in the Virgin Islanders but none of their parents or grandparents are from or born in the Virgin Islands are deemed to be non-indigenous Virgin Islanders.

The VI Deputy Premier and Minister for Natural Resources and Labour Dr. the Honourable Kedrick D. Pickering was at the time speaking during the Budget Debate on December 16, 2014 at the Second Sitting of the Fourth Session of the Second House of Assembly when he called for the protection of indigenous residents.

The 7th District Representative told the public that , “persons who live here and call the BVI home must also be protected, but at the same time there must be the assurance, as enshrined in the Constitution that the indigenous people have a special form of protection above anything else”

Dr. Pickering said, “We must not allow the indigenous Virgin Islanders to be push around… it cannot be allowed to happen. So those who come to live amongst us have to appreciate that those of us who are leaders have to appreciate that leaders have to protect the indigenous people…..”

The Minster for National Resources and Labour who is a senior Minister of Government in the Dr. Smith Administration and who many have credited with quietly going about doing his work and not hungry for publicity unlike the rookie Minister for Education and Culture Walwyn warned that “we cannot create a society where locals are already outnumbered, where we are being pushed aside”.

Examples of Virgin Islanders who are indigenous & non-indigenous

While the Hon. Dr. Kedrick D. Pickering (R7) did not make the distinction between indigenous and non-indigenous Virgin Islanders there is public example of those who fit the different categories.

The Minister for Education and Culture Honourable Myron V. Walwyn is a non-indigenous Virgin Islander, as none of his parents or his grandparents are born in the VI. Whereas youth leader, businessman and political activist Rajah A. Smith is an indigenous Virgin Islander. Both Mr. Smith’s parents and grandparents are born in the VI.

Representative of the Eighth District Honourable Marlon A. Penn is an indigenous Virgin Islander having both of his parents and grandparents born in the Virgin Islands. Whereas Speaker of the House of Assembly Ingrid A. Moses is a non-indigenous Virgin Islander as while she was born in the VI none of her parents or grandparents were born in the VI.

Another example is the Virgin Islands’ first lady Lorna G. Smith while a legal resident with full rights as a Virgin Islander under the constitution Mrs. Smith the wife of the Premier was not born in the VI nor were any of her parents or grandparents. However, political activist and lecturer at the the H. Lavity Stoutt Community College and People’s Empowerment Party President Natalio D. Wheatley aka Sowande Uhuru is an indigenous Virgin Islander, having been born in the VI with both parents and grandparents been also born in the Territory.

Call for a harmonious society - Hon Fraser

Many critics of the NDP welcomed the cry of Hon Pickering for the protection of indigenous peoples of the VI. They claimed that since the current administration took office in 2011 both locals and indigenous residents have been treated like second class citizens in their homeland, with much of the victimization and firings in the public service meted out to locals.

They also charged that the NDP has played a divisive type of politics pitting blacks against whites, locals against expats and rich against poor.

In a national address to the Virgin Islands in November of this year, Virgin Islands Party Chairman Hon Julian Fraser RA, (R3) called for a harmonious society where the rights of all are respected and paid tribute to our Caribbean brothers and sisters who have help built the VI.

36 Responses to “‘Protect the minority indigenous people’- Dr. Pickering cries out ”

  • respect (29/12/2014, 19:05) Like (13) Dislike (4) Reply
    well saw we need a law saying non-indigenous people cannot serve in our legislative counsel like they have in Antigua and TT
    • READ!! (29/12/2014, 23:30) Like (3) Dislike (1) Reply
      Section 65 of our constitution:

      Qualifications for elected membership
      65.—(1) Subject to this section and section 66, a person shall be qualified to be elected as a member of the House of Assembly if, and shall not be qualified to be so elected unless, he or she—
      (a) was so qualified immediately before the commencement of this Constitution; or
      (b) is a person who—
      (i) is a Virgin Islander of the age of twenty-one years or upwards; and
      (ii) is otherwise qualified as a voter under section 68.
      (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4), for the purposes of subsection (1)(b)(i) a “Virgin Islander” is a person who belongs to the Virgin Islands by birth or descent who was—
      (a) born in the Virgin Islands of a father or mother who at the time of the birth was a British overseas territories citizen (or a British Dependent Territories citizen) by virtue of birth in
      35
      the Virgin Islands or by virtue of descent from a father or mother who was born in the Virgin Islands;
      (b) born in the Virgin Islands of a father or mother who at the time of the birth belonged to the Virgin Islands by birth or descent; or
      (c) born outside the Virgin Islands of a father or mother who at the time of the birth belonged to the Virgin Islands by birth or descent.
      (3) A person born outside the Virgin Islands who belongs to the Virgin Islands by descent shall not be qualified to be elected as a member of the House of Assembly unless one of his or her grandparents belonged to the Virgin Islands by birth.
      (4) A person, whether born in or outside the Virgin Islands, who would otherwise be qualified to be elected as an elected member of the House of Assembly by virtue of subsection (1)(b) shall not be so qualified unless—
      (a) where that person has never been domiciled in the Virgin Islands, he or she has resided in the Virgin Islands for at least five years immediately before the date of his or her nomination for election; or
      (b) where that person was formerly domiciled in the Virgin Islands but has lived outside the Virgin Islands for a continuous period of at least ten years (excluding periods related to medical or educational purposes), he or she has resided in the Virgin Islands for at least three years immediately before the date of his or her nomination for election and is domiciled in the Virgin Islands at that date.

      Is every sitting member qualified according to the above??!!
      • stop it! (30/12/2014, 10:36) Like (3) Dislike (6) Reply
        Stop nitpicking! The Constitution also states that anyone that was qualified BEFORE the new Constitution was passed in 2007, is automatically qualified (grandfathered) under the new Constitution. You are no different to the Religious idiots who quote bits of pieces of text to support their argument. ALL persons including Archie, Mark and Myron were qualified to contest elections prior to the new Constitution coming into force. You need to READ.
        • READ!! (30/12/2014, 11:06) Like (7) Dislike (2) Reply
          Interpretation is a boss! Notice I did not mention any names in my post but now that you let the cat out of the bag let us look into it! YES, Archie and Mark are eligible because they both ran under the old constitution; Mark served and Archie ran hence being grandfathered. Now as for Myron:

          65 (b) born in the Virgin Islands of a father or mother WHO AT THE TIME OF BIRTH BELONGED TO THE VIRGIN ISLANDS BY BIRTH OR DESCENT???

          Did he ever run for office before the enactment of VI Constitution 2007?!

          The VI Constitution is no religious text you IDIOT; it is the foundation law document that governs here and NEED to be followed to the letter!
          • Stop It (30/12/2014, 13:35) Like (3) Dislike (1) Reply
            Read, you are so dumb! Read 65 (a) of the Constitution that YOU POSTED! It states:

            Qualifications for elected membership
            65.—(1) Subject to this section and section 66, a person shall be qualified to be elected as a member of the House of Assembly if, and shall not be qualified to be so elected unless, he or she—
            (a) was so qualified immediately before the commencement of this Constitution; or

            What further explanation you mean? They either meet 65 (a), 'OR' the other requirements. Thanks for showing the world what a jackass you are. Imagine you posted it right there and still didn't read it? LMAO!!!!
            • Read! (30/12/2014, 19:01) Like (7) Dislike (1) Reply
              Poor you! Like I said interpretation; you have yours and I have mine. Hope the VIP have sense and balls enough to challenge the validity and call it for what it is! No amount of PR will cover up this one! Funny you arguing the point about MVW and not the other two.....hmmmmm!
              • @read (31/12/2014, 00:56) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
                The bush lawyer down the bay tried this nonsense after elections and VIP told him to stop the nonsense. All those so called questionable persons got legal opinions before contesting. If there was a case it would be brought forward. It's not about interpretation it's common sense. The sky is blue. The grass is green. There is nothing to interpret, it is clear as day. Just because you can't understand it doesn't make it a complex issue. You need to look up the difference between 'and' and 'or' before commenting.
                • @ Myron (31/12/2014, 17:20) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
                  Hogwash, your comment does not make sense and it seems you are against Smith suggestion because what he says makes sense!
          • Ummm.. (30/12/2014, 13:38) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
            If Myron is qualified under 65 (a) then 65 (b) does not change anything. If you notice in the text you quoted above, it says you are qualified if you meet 65 (a), 'OR', then it lists the rest. It doesn't say 65 (a) 'AND'. lol
            • Could have true (30/12/2014, 19:10) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
              Interesting point being put forward here in the comments.

              @Read! - Instead of 65 (b) you might be referring to 65 2(b) as it relates to Virgin Islander.

              Just my two cents.
  • bull frog (29/12/2014, 19:09) Like (19) Dislike (9) Reply
    myron, archie and Mark should have never been in we HOUSE and I will say that untill i die
  • Tortola (29/12/2014, 19:09) Like (19) Dislike (3) Reply
    Wow this is very enlightening. But you say one thing and doing another. Our locals are still being pushed out under you watch. Hear this"people" we need to settle the score and very soon to.
  • Fools (29/12/2014, 21:08) Like (12) Dislike (10) Reply
    There are no indigenous VI.
  • Law Abiding citizen (29/12/2014, 21:42) Like (12) Dislike (7) Reply
    The word "indigenous" would refer to the native Indians who once inhabited these islands. As black people, we are indigenous to Africa.....not these islands. Another term would be more accurate.
    • Metamorphosis of Language (30/12/2014, 16:25) Like (2) Dislike (1) Reply
      For the use of the word "indigenous", there is NO universally accepted definition.
  • born here (29/12/2014, 23:28) Like (3) Dislike (2) Reply
    Years to come it will get worse because BVIslanders not having their kids here and for those expats cant get no papers when their child born here so where they get the passport that's where them from. You all might reconsider this or else foreigners will definetley take over when the older folks die out.
  • Marco Polo (30/12/2014, 02:32) Like (15) Dislike (5) Reply
    Dear Minister, History would suggest the only true indigenous people of the Virgin Islands were the Arawaks leading peaceful lives at Sopers Hole, Long Bay, West End, and other protected bays around the BVI.
    I assume therefore you refer more to the concept of Belonger and Non-Belonger status when referring to indigenous and non-indigenous Virgin Islanders. May I suggest that only residents with proven DNA Arawak-Indian ancestry be qualfied to vote at the forth coming elections! Problem solved.
    • mercy (30/12/2014, 14:21) Like (2) Dislike (4) Reply
      Lord have mercy, there is an intelligent person in the VI after all. I could shake your hand
    • sea cows bay (03/01/2015, 02:19) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
      History also tells us that the Caribs and Arawaks canoed to the Virgin Islands from South America. So, for all practical purposes, the descendants from eighteen thirty four are indigenous since all others met them here.
  • Last of the Mohicans (30/12/2014, 04:09) Like (9) Dislike (2) Reply
    Any country, anywhere in the world which has stats like these must protect it's people. Period.
  • Hmm (30/12/2014, 05:08) Like (6) Dislike (4) Reply
    Isn't it because everyone goes to give birth in PR or USVI so that they get two passports? That would mean it's hard for some people to be "indigenous"
  • .... (30/12/2014, 06:01) Like (7) Dislike (16) Reply
    Well thank God for Myron. One of the best ministers of Education ever in the Virgin Islands. .
  • check history (30/12/2014, 07:00) Like (4) Dislike (1) Reply
    I bet u money if u look back 4 to 5 generation back alot of indigenous talk for alot of them goes away! I my concern should be the culture and history of bvi that needs to be preserved. Demographic always changes!
  • Forbidden Truth (30/12/2014, 07:12) Like (6) Dislike (0) Reply

    Protecting the socalled "indigenous" virgin islander is a tall order. The die has been set a long time ago where WE in the VI has disrespected each other to the point of no return. We throw qualified people who have this country at heart under the bus for personal and political reasons. A lot of those expats who have a born here parent especially a father, their minds are poisoned early about VI people by their disgtungled mothers who didnt get a ring on their finger. The Ag PS in O.....o office is a prime example of that.
    Another thing, once people in positions of power begin to think that they know more than the people they serve we have chaos. We are in a very sad state in the Virgin Islands.Boom Boom Kahboom.

  • @ ... (30/12/2014, 07:17) Like (16) Dislike (0) Reply
    Who Thanking god for that ole vindictive disgraceful wicked man? He simply trying to buy the next elections by giving away money...but we plan to vote him out and eat him out!!!!!
  • whatathing (30/12/2014, 08:53) Like (15) Dislike (0) Reply
    Has he finally been enlightened or he is saying what he thinks the "indigenous" Virgin Islander wants to hear. Interesting he is saying this close to elections.
  • Online Now (30/12/2014, 09:33) Like (2) Dislike (7) Reply
    Protected? Like how? We already have non-belongers needing licences to work, own property, reside etc. Increased taxes to leave the island, work, buy property. Status is awarded after an extended period of legal residence.

    So, protected how? The statistic above relates to people being born in the Territory. The truth is so many people go away to have their children due to the benefits of being born in other countires or better healthcare. That's what needs to be considered, not further stignatism of non-belongers!
  • Deportee (30/12/2014, 11:13) Like (2) Dislike (3) Reply

    There are many people who believe they are indigenous to the VI but according to the strict definition of the law, they are not.
    Indigenous is a nice catchy term but it creates a loophole that disqualifies most of the so called natives and thus allows “others” to stand on equal footing.
    The forced exodus had begun more than forty years ago and continues even today. So to cry “protect the endangered minority indigenous people” is untenable at this stage unless there is a deliberate and sustained call for sons and daughters to come home.
  • dd (30/12/2014, 11:35) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    Deep piece
  • big picture (30/12/2014, 11:49) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    What is the importance of this distinction, as far as I am concern it is nothing to be upset about. We put things like this in place to make sure people are of the Value(norms---->cultural) believing that several generations will help to ensure that persons cultivate ways that we consider important. It is not done to keep any one down, if that was the case then it would require more than just a few generations.
    There need to be a completeness where laws, cultural norms and education work hand in hand, not sure if the VI is doing that and needs to quickly.

    This is what the article/conversation should be about.
  • Legal Mind (30/12/2014, 13:33) Like (2) Dislike (1) Reply
    @ READ, you need to quit while you are ahead. The Constitution makes no mention of persons previously contesting elected office. It makes mention to persons who were deemed qualified to contest elected office at the time before the 2007 Constitution was passed. Any person, whether they ran for elections before or not, who met the requirements under the old Constitution, at the time the new one was passed, is deemed eligible to contest elections, being grandfathered into the new Constitution. It is not rocket science here, the Constitution is very clear and never at any point mention anything about persons having to first seek elected office. It clearly stated that the person(s) would need to be 'qualified', i.e., met the requirements 'at the time'. I really hope that you are not advising anyone on legal matters as that would be a complete disaster, if you cannot comprehend something so simple.
  • Constitution (30/12/2014, 13:54) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    People, go read the VI Constitution yourself and do not let people fool you. In terms of who can contest elections, it's clear. Please read for yourselves and don't get confused. http://www.bvi.org.uk/files/constitution2007.pdf


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.