Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

Jack the super wealthy & the working poor

Dickson C. Igwe. Photo: VINO/File
By Dickson C. Igwe

Austere trickledown economics has created a world Oligarchy. The world is ruled by the super-wealthy. A great irony with globalization is that it has re-established the exponential social inequalities inherent in both ancient and recent history.

Furthermore, globalization has benefitted autocrats and authoritarian rulers. Democracy has not benefitted from globalization, albeit, globalization has created a new middle class- in relative terms- in Asia, Africa, and the Third World, of over a billion people. The new middle class is ruled over by authoritarians and dictators mainly.

OK. From the gilded age of the early 1900s, back to medieval feudalism, then all the way back to the start of written history, the world has been ruled by elites. Monarchs, scribes, warrior kings, landed nobles, and wealthy merchants, have ruled from the time of Ancient Egypt.

Democracy is actually very recent. And women and blacks in the west only got the vote in the early to mid -1900s. For most of human history, slavery, serfdom, and the toil of the peasantry has been the norm.

The 1% rule the world assisted in their control of the global economy by the 9%. The 9% are the advisers: lawyers, bankers, administrators, managers, and the security and military apparatus, who keep the wealth of the 1% ‘safe and sound.’ The 9% form a type of professional upper class: they are an invisible wall between the 90% and the 1%. The 9% are in the $150K to $1M earnings bracket. These are proverbial ‘’henchmen’’ of the super-wealthy and powerful.

OK: What struggling  "western workers" fail to realize is that they would actually be better off were they to drop their swords of xenophobia and race hate, and work with their fellow black and minority colleagues, to obtain better wages and benefits from the 1%, who own their places of work.

The 1% dislikes Unions and socialist type organizations intensely, and for good reason.

Before the onset of the Supply Sided, Trickle Down, Economy, post the 1970s, the 90% - the working and middle classes- were actually better off in real terms than they are today. The Keynesian Economy was a bottom-up fiscal culture that invested heavily in social infrastructure that benefitted the masses. Public investment and economic stimulus drove western economics. Keynesian economics and socialism are a symbiosis.

Since the onset of Trickle Down in the early 1980s, wages and living standards have stagnated for the 90%. Instead, there has been a massive transfer of wealth from the 90% to the 1%.

A key reason for this transfer has been the increase in private debt brought on by the Trickle Down, Economy. This is debt that is indirectly owed to the 1%. Debt is a tool for increasing consumer demand. Increased consumer demand drives up both corporate profit and personal debt under the Supply Side Economy. Debt is also a reason for the boom to bust economic cycle.

Now, that growth in wealth inequality has been blamed for the social upheaval in the US and the UK.

Migrants are not to blame for job losses in the UK and USA. Those job losses are the result of a new world economic order that is integrated and top-down, where factory and business owners can move assets offshore, or to the Far East, at the click of a mouse.

Under the Trickle Down Supply-Side economy, CEOs and top executives contemplate the purchase of their second yacht and third vacation home while the struggling working and lower-middle classes get the crumbs that fall off the ‘’proverbial buffet table.’’

Politicians who are part of the 1% like Donald Trump, giving tax breaks to their super-wealthy friends, will not help blue-collar types in Iowa and Ohio.

Connect with Dickson Igwe on Facebook and Twitter

2 Responses to “Jack the super wealthy & the working poor”

  • qc (16/11/2019, 10:10) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    I agree!
  • E. Leonard (17/11/2019, 16:00) Like (3) Dislike (0) Reply
    Indeed, wealth inequality is a global issue. There is a gaping and widening hole between the wealthy and the poor and the wealthy and middle class. 1% of population owns approximately 50% of the world wealth. Even more scandalous is per Oxfam( Oxfam is a confederation of 19 independent charitable organizations focusing on the alleviation of global poverty, founded in 1942 and led by Oxfam International), 26 individuals own more wealth than the poorest 50%(3.8 bn people). In the US, 1% of families hold 40% of all wealth; bottom 90% hold less than 25% of all wealth. And the bottom 90% holds 73% of all debt. The prevalence of plastic is increasing the level of debt and the debt crisis. Plastic is easy to use but difficult to pay off, especially if only the minimum payment is made; it is one worst debt to incur. Further, the richest 1% own more wealth than the bottom 90%.

    Moreover, the wealthy/rich has greater opportunities to invest to enhance their wealth. It takes money to make money as the saying goes. For the most part, the poor lacks the discretionary resources to invest, for while the wealthy/rich sail around on their yachts or fly around on their jet stream jets or feast on caviar at luxurious mansions/hotels, the poor struggles to put shelter over their heads, clothes on their backs and feed their families. The challenges for the developed, emerging and undeveloped countries is 1)reduce the level of poverty and 2) narrow that gaping wealth inequality gap.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.