Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

Guilty with explanation not an acceptable plea - Magistrate

Magistrate Richards does not consider guilty with explanation a plea.
ROAD TOWN, Tortola, VI- Many times persons have stood before magistrates and have tried to sugar coat their guilty plea with an explanation. While some magistrates would accept it as guilty, others would take it as not guilty as in the case of magistrate Tamia Richards who refused to accept it from Nelson Myers in court recently.

Charged for common assault, allegedly committed on May 26, 2011 at Cane Garden Bay but only appearing in court on November 14, 2011, Nelson Myers told the magistrate he was pleading guilty with explanation, but was told that she could not accept that as a plea.

The magistrate explained that assault could be lawful if it was committed in an act of self-defence therefore the defendant could plead not guilty and that there were only two options when pleading - guilty or not guilty.

Our research tells us that in the English system, a plea is regarded as voluntary if the defendant, properly advised as to the possible alternatives by his counsel, has the freedom in his own mind to choose the plea he will make. In his case the defendant, who was unrepresented, was advised of his alternatives by the magistrate. Interestingly, until 1772, if a defendant refused to plead guilty or not guilty, his trial was delayed from taking place, and he was tortured until he either died or entered a plea! This was changed to allow the judge to enter a plea of not guilty if the defendant refused to plead.

Mr. Nelson then pleaded guilty.

According to the prosecution, Mr. Nelson had allegedly unlawfully assaulted Jerome Davis. There was, however, no case file at the time and the defendant was required to return to court on another day.

In legal terms, a plea is simply an answer to a claim made by someone in a civil or criminal case under common law using the adversary system. Colloquially, a plea has come to mean the assertion by a criminal defendant at arraignment, or otherwise in response to a criminal charge.

According to Wikepedia, a "blind plea" is a guilty plea entered with no plea agreement in place. One defendant accused of illegally protesting nuclear power, when asked to enter his plea, stated, "I plead for the beauty that surrounds us". This type of unorthodox plea is sometimes referred to as a "creative plea," and will usually be interpreted as a plea of not guilty. Likewise, standing mute and refusing to enter any plea at all will usually be interpreted as a not guilty plea; the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, for instance, state, "If a defendant refuses to enter a plea or if a defendant organization fails to appear, the court must enter a plea of not guilty.

4 Responses to “Guilty with explanation not an acceptable plea - Magistrate ”

  • billy b (21/11/2011, 09:13) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    YAAAWWN
  • under dog (21/11/2011, 13:08) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Tamia full of crap..she playin tuff lookin for Val job but J Godon tis just as much NDP as she so Val aint going no where!
  • Walk Alone (21/11/2011, 14:01) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Great article. Law 101. I loved it. Didn't really care about Meyers. He had enough time to be better advised by his lawyers, on how he should plead.
  • Tonya (22/11/2011, 19:40) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Guilty with explanation simply means the defendant pleads guilty, but simultaneously makes a plea for mitigation of his sentence. This means he has taken the opportunity to explain to the court the circumstances which led to his being charged with the offense, in hopes of obtaining a lighter sentence... Whats so difficult to see about that? Damn!


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.