Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

Exposed steel under VG jetty to be ‘treated’- Hon Vanterpool

According to Minister for Communications and Works Hon Mark H. Vanterpool (R4), the BVI Ports Authority (BVIPA) is currently exploring the use of a Fosroc Surface Repair System to ‘treat the exposed steel’ on the underside of the St Thomas Bay jetty, ‘thereby significantly reducing the rate of deterioration from the elements and increasing the dock’s life span.’ Photo: Team of Reporters/File
Leader of the Opposition Honourable Andrew A. Fahie (R1), left, while in the House of Assembly on June 13, 2017, questioned Minister for Communications and Works Hon Mark H. Vanterpool (R4), right, on the repair works to the St Thomas Bay jetty on Virgin Gorda. Photo: VINO/File
Leader of the Opposition Honourable Andrew A. Fahie (R1), left, while in the House of Assembly on June 13, 2017, questioned Minister for Communications and Works Hon Mark H. Vanterpool (R4), right, on the repair works to the St Thomas Bay jetty on Virgin Gorda. Photo: VINO/File
The total rehabilitation cost expended to date on the St Thomas Bay jetty is Three Hundred Fifty-Nine Thousand Five Hundred Seventy-Four Thousand Dollars and Seventy-Eight Cents ($359,574.78). Photo: VINO/File
The total rehabilitation cost expended to date on the St Thomas Bay jetty is Three Hundred Fifty-Nine Thousand Five Hundred Seventy-Four Thousand Dollars and Seventy-Eight Cents ($359,574.78). Photo: VINO/File
VALLEY, Virgin Gorda, VI- It was on May 22, 2017 that this news site brought to the attention of the public, via photographs, the state of the underside of the St Thomas Bay jetty on Virgin Gorda.

The photos, taken at the time the jetty was undergoing repairs to the surface, raised concerns about the stability and safety of the jetty with the many noticeable cracks and steels exposed on the underside.

The article drew much reaction from the public, especially on social media, who criticised the National Democratic Party (NDP) Government for ignoring the underside of the jetty for repairs.

Exposed steel to be treated

However, in an answer to a question posed by Leader of the Opposition Honourable Andrew A. Fahie (R1) as to whether there would be additional works on the St Thomas Bay jetty on June 13, 2017 in the House of Assembly, Minister for Communications and Works Hon Mark H. Vanterpool (R4) said it is intended that additional works to be carried out on the dock will include bulk heading of the cargo facility adjacent to the current location, the separation and inclusion of an access drive-way at the rear of the building.

Regarding the underside of the jetty, Hon Vanterpool said the BVI Ports Authority (BVIPA) is currently “exploring the use of a Fosroc Surface Repair System, which, when applied to the under surface, is expected to treat the exposed steel, thereby significantly reducing the rate of deterioration from the elements and increasing the dock’s life span.”

It is, however, without an engineer’s input, not clear to this news site if this proposed remedy would be effective and for how long as one of the concerns was that the exposed steel would expand and could damage the integrity of the jetty.

A defined timeline for these additional works, according to the Minister, has “not been set as yet.”

Engineering report for jetty was submitted

Meanwhile, Hon Fahie also wanted to know if the Minister received engineering reports regarding the structural integrity of the jetty given the reported degradation of the steel works at the under-side.

“Madam Speaker, Yes! I am in receipt of a copy of the engineering report for the St Thomas Bay Jetty, Hon Vanterpool replied, stating that the report was not used for the works recently executed.

It should be noted that Honourable Vanterpool had stated early last month that a study was conducted by engineers on the jetty, which showed that it was intact, but the concrete slab is where the issue lies.

"I want to let them (public) know that the construction of the dock on Virgin Gorda is not a cosmetic job...The study we had done by engineers suggests that the piles and support under the dock is still very good, strong. The issue is the actual concrete slab that has been deteriorating," the Minister explained.

Repairs went over budget

It was also revealed that the total rehabilitation cost expended to date on the St Thomas Bay jetty was Three Hundred Fifty-Nine Thousand Five Hundred Seventy-Four Thousand Dollars and Seventy-Eight Cents ($359,574.78).

A development budget for the jetty in the amount of Three Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($350,000) was submitted and approved by the British Virgin Islands Ports Authority (BVIPA) during its 2017 budget exercises; however, the BVI Ports Authority requested some additional works, after awarding the contract, in the amount of $52,365.88. 

19 Responses to “Exposed steel under VG jetty to be ‘treated’- Hon Vanterpool”

  • pressure from vino (15/06/2017, 18:41) Like (15) Dislike (1) Reply
    THANKX!
  • cay (15/06/2017, 18:48) Like (14) Dislike (0) Reply
    Nothing these guys could get right
  • VG (15/06/2017, 18:54) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
    The bathrooms were also renovated. This was not in the initial plan
  • Jacperlance (15/06/2017, 19:16) Like (17) Dislike (0) Reply
    Treated? Are these guys for real. The Bible speaks about putting new wine in old bottles. Look at the condition under that dock. Spent almost $400. 000 to nice up the surface and the underneath is rotten, they got to be joking. Where are all the engineers in this place
  • WASP (15/06/2017, 19:24) Like (19) Dislike (0) Reply
    so shouldn't that have been the first thing done ?
  • Peter (15/06/2017, 19:51) Like (12) Dislike (0) Reply
    ALL THAT MONEY SPENT AND THE UNDERNEATH IS STILL EXPOSED? SMH
    • job (15/06/2017, 20:08) Like (20) Dislike (0) Reply
      Peter the way I see it, those guys have no shame. When I heard the minister boasting about the millions of dollars spent on infrastructure and we really cannot see value for money, I often wonder if he good in he head or if he have no shame. It is ridiculous.
  • Real Talk (15/06/2017, 20:16) Like (9) Dislike (1) Reply
    Just NDP government .they are so intelligent wow
  • Political Observer (PO) (15/06/2017, 20:38) Like (12) Dislike (0) Reply
    Was the $52K change order for scope oversight, differing site condition, latent defects, or additional work? "Yes! I am in receipt of a copy of the engineering report for the St Thomas Bay Jetty,” he said, adding that the report was not used in relation to the works recently done on the dock." The engineering evaluation was not used on the present project. Really! If not the engineering evaluation, what drove the need for and scope of the current project? Was a condition assessment done on the wharf? And if so what was the result? Did the result indicate that the underside of the wharf was structural sound?

    What did the engineer's report say about the reinforcement in the concrete, especially the exposed steel on the under side of the wharf? Did the spalling affect the strength and structural integrity of the concrete? Can the effects of spalling be fixed by mere covering over the exposed steel supposedly to slow down the deterioration? Did the spalling reduce the cross section of the steel, reducing the strength? Will just covering the steel present a false sense of security that present a public health and safety hazard? Life/safety first.
    • E. Leonard (15/06/2017, 23:29) Like (11) Dislike (0) Reply
      From a desk jockey assessment of the pictures of the concrete on the under side of the jetty, it appears as if significant corrosion of the reinforcement (rebar/steel) has occurred and is occurring. The corrosion of the rebars resulted in spalling and cracking of the concrete. Possible corrosion contributing factors are 1)poor quality concrete, 2)inadequate concrete cover of steel, 3)exposure of rebar to chloride/salt...........or a combination of these contributing factors. Corroding steel can experience 1)strength reduction, 2)reduce load-bearing capacity and 3)reduce structural capacity. No doubt, in the interest of public health and safety, an engineering evaluation (EE)/condition assessment e.g. is needed with urgent action needed to correct any identified deficiencies.
      • @E. Leonard (16/06/2017, 11:59) Like (4) Dislike (4) Reply
        @E. Leonard, good stuff but too technical. Most of us do not know anything about load-bearing capacity, structural capacity, minimum concrete cover, oxidation and corrosion.........etc. Use the the KISS ( Keep it Simple Stupid) principle. Keep ihe comments coming though.
        • Hmm (16/06/2017, 15:28) Like (7) Dislike (0) Reply
          What a shame. You would like to make it seem like "most" of us have no simple understanding......load bearing capacity is self explanatory. Perhaps you should've stayed in school instead in the bathrooms..
  • m 2 cents (15/06/2017, 21:20) Like (8) Dislike (1) Reply
    Mark needs to hire a consultant to spin his shameful projects like funny man does
  • wize up (16/06/2017, 06:11) Like (4) Dislike (7) Reply
    Just looking think to talk: the Jetty in Gorda have been there long before 2017: that same jetty needed mainatance longer before so why the previous government(VIP)did nothing to fix the same jetty them here harping over
    h(I am no expert but I took a few years well for that jetty to reach that condition)...fahie and his other political coligues had more than enought years in public office to fix the same jetty( talk that because when you tiard talk to must stop)
    • Jacperlance (16/06/2017, 07:36) Like (7) Dislike (0) Reply
      Wize-up you seems to be a strong supporter of the NDP and always quick to jump to their defense, but if you are so in tune with the happenings here, you would have known that the jetty went through refurbishment some years ago under the VIP. This is not the time to shift blame as to who should have. The issue here is, that the top of the jetty should not have been refurbished with the underneath in that condition. Shame on you
      • wize up (16/06/2017, 18:17) Like (0) Dislike (4) Reply
        Jackperlance; you hate the facts and I will continue to vote for NFP and ain't noting you can do about: voteded VIP from 1981 but those guys allowed the party to fall so I went 2011 to NDP and I am not the only ones.......it's only a converversation so clam down gets into yor
        VI history, that facts are all there stop take political gimmicks so personal:
        • Jacperlance (17/06/2017, 09:19) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
          That's your constitutional rights boss, you vote for who ever you want but my issues with you is when you come chatting cow shit.
    • Quiet Storm (16/06/2017, 08:53) Like (10) Dislike (1) Reply
      The election is over; the honeymoon is long over. Governments are not kick to the curb because they are performing well. They are kick to the curb because the electorate want a change. All opposition parties campaign that they have the solutions to ails countries. Once in power they need to perform. Point fingers at former governments are not going to solve the problems to meet the needs of the country and residents. The NDP won and it is time to solve the problems.
  • Just a taxi driver (16/06/2017, 09:36) Like (6) Dislike (0) Reply
    What the minister is saying is so far from reality, its unbelievable to hear this crap. It is very obvious very poor
    engineering went into the support beams holding up the slabs. The nerves to tell the people the engineering report was not used is mind boggling.

    Even I could have tell you the underside is poor and needs addressing first, free of cost. Not paying some so call engineer, ignore his report and them do it last.



Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.