Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

COVID-19 led to discovery VI’s borders ‘quite porous’– Hon Malone

United Kingdom navy ship HMS Medway patrols the border in the Sir Francis Drake Channel between the Virgin Islands and St John, US Virgin Islands on September 30, 2020. Photo: VINO/File
Health Minister Hon Carvin Malone (AL) addressing residents of Jost van Dyke at a community meeting held there on Thursday, October 22, 2020. Photo: Facebook/File
Health Minister Hon Carvin Malone (AL) addressing residents of Jost van Dyke at a community meeting held there on Thursday, October 22, 2020. Photo: Facebook/File
 Minister for Health and Social Development, Hon Carvin Malone (AL) has revealed that it was COVID-19 pandemic that led authorities to discover how porous the Virgin Islands (VI) sea borders were. Photo: VINO/File
Minister for Health and Social Development, Hon Carvin Malone (AL) has revealed that it was COVID-19 pandemic that led authorities to discover how porous the Virgin Islands (VI) sea borders were. Photo: VINO/File
GREAT HARBOUR, Jost van Dyke, VI - Minister for Health and Social Development, Hon Carvin Malone (AL) has revealed that it was the COVID-19 pandemic that led authorities to discover how porous the Virgin Islands (VI) sea borders really were.

The minister revealed the information while addressing residents of Jost van Dyke at a community meeting held there on Thursday, October 22, 2020.

He said only after the spike of 53 COVID-19 cases in August of 2020, that the administration got a clear picture of the border situation in the territory.

“We found out that our south-west and our north-west borders were quite porous in terms of what we've done for years,” he said.

Incoming boats were bypassing immigration – Hon Malone

Hon Malone continued, “boats would come over from St John and from St Thomas, some of them will check-in and some will not,” the Minister revealed.

The discovery of the breach resulted in the channelling of resources to beef up border security through the use of barges, also to contact trace smuggled individuals.

According to the Minister, the territory was able to contain the spread due to successful contact tracing, where those individuals were tracked and placed in quarantine.

15 Responses to “COVID-19 led to discovery VI’s borders ‘quite porous’– Hon Malone”

  • El Chapo (27/10/2020, 12:49) Like (13) Dislike (2) Reply
    Duh. Where have you been ? Stop the drugs & money laundering and the BVI is dead. You’ll blame it on COVID
    • Black Economy (27/10/2020, 17:37) Like (2) Dislike (2) Reply
      As much as it pains me El Chapo is correct, with Tourism and the Financial Sectors plummeting the BVI is dependant on the Black Economy
  • Really (27/10/2020, 13:49) Like (13) Dislike (0) Reply
    seems like you was sleeping bro
  • Hon. Malone (27/10/2020, 14:23) Like (5) Dislike (2) Reply
    U R a bright level headed reasoning person I have a lot of respect for. I can't believe you were involved in the creation of this reopening plan.. that has no balance in regards to safety and the economy... It's a very unbalance plan... Not good for business.
  • Rubber Duck (27/10/2020, 15:16) Like (12) Dislike (0) Reply
    You must be the only person in BVI that did not know that people come in and out as they please. What did you imagine these go faster boats are doing at night? Stargazing?
  • Thoughtful Sailor (27/10/2020, 15:41) Like (12) Dislike (0) Reply
    But, guess who WASN'T involved in all the border violations? Charter boats and their guests. It was land folks from here, and Customs, among others, has known exactly this, for years, and years, and years.
  • Yep (27/10/2020, 16:02) Like (6) Dislike (0) Reply
    And that's the reason we need a better system to monitor our borders. Radars and other things instead of two guys chatting inside a shed waiting for ppl to report in
  • now now (27/10/2020, 16:32) Like (11) Dislike (0) Reply
    Cant believe he is saying this with a straight face.
  • Heckler (27/10/2020, 16:43) Like (8) Dislike (0) Reply
    No tish Sherlock. So the third pillar just never existed?
  • Really! (27/10/2020, 17:14) Like (10) Dislike (0) Reply
    your head of customs as well as your premier can you tell you a lot more about whats happening in their backyard..
  • Updated Suppression Order (27/10/2020, 17:21) Like (0) Dislike (1) Reply
    Masks are still required to be worn as per the updated Suppression Order on 22 October, 2020.

    The Suppression Order has been extended to 30 November, 2020 unless extended by the Minister.

    Face masks or face shield to be worn in public.

    7. (1) Subject to this section, every person shall wear a face mask, at all times when in a public place, including at any establishment, gatherings and on public transportation.

    (2) Subsection (1) shall not apply where a person is

    (a) in open air settings and maintains a physical distance of no less than six feet from any other person who may be nearby;
    (b) driving alone, or is with members of his or her household;
    (c) obtaining services at a healthcare facility, including hospitals, medical or dental clinics, pharmacies, elderly facilities, facilities providing veterinary care or similar services for animals, and is directed by an employee at the healthcare facility to remove his or her face mask or face shield;
    (d) is consuming food or drinks;
    (e) in an assigned office, which consists of an enclosed room and is not shared by other persons;
    (f) at an assigned office space and physical distancing protocols specified to in section 6 are being adhered to; or
    (g)

    (3) A face shield may be worn instead of a face mask by the following
    persons:

    (a) a child twelve years and under, who may have difficulty wearing a face mask for a prolonged period;
    (b) a person who has a health conditions which may cause breathing or medical difficulties if the person wears a face mask for a prolonged period;
    (c) a person who has intellectual and developmental disabilities;
    (d) a person who care for those who rely on lip reading to communicate; required to remove the mask or face shield in order to ascertain his or her identity or for security purposes.

    Penalties.

    9. (1) A police officer or an Environmental Health Officer may visit any establishment or public place to ensure compliance with these Orders or any guidelines issued pursuant to section 8 and shall enforce these Orders in accordance with subsection (2).

    (2) Where a police officer or an Environmental Health Officer reasonably believes that a person or an establishment is contravening or has contravened these Orders, the officer shall

    (a) in the case of an individual,

    (i) for the first breach, issue a fixed penalty notice requiring the person to pay a fine of one hundred dollars and to attend such mandatory training as may be specified in the notice; and

    (ii) for any subsequent breach, issue a fixed penalty notice requiring the person to pay a fine of two hundred dollars;

    (b) in the case of an establishment,

    (i) for the first breach,

    (A) issue a fixed penalty notice requiring the owner or operators to pay a fine of one thousand dollars, and

    (B) a notice for temporary closure, subject to such mandatory training and to implementation of such corrective measures as may be specified in the notice;

    for a second breach,

    (A) issue a fixed penalty notice requiring the owner or operators to pay a fine of two thousand dollars; and

    (B) order the immediate closure of the establishment and the revocation of the Environmental Health Certificate.

    (3) A fixed penalty imposed under this section shall be paid to the Magistrate’s Court.

    (4) A fixed penalty notice issued under this section shall

    (a) set out the particulars of the offence;
    (b) specify the period within which the penalty it to be paid;
    (c) specify the amount of the fine;
    (d) specify that payments shall be made to the Magistrate’s Court.

    (5) If the fine is paid, no proceedings shall be brought against the person served with the notice.

    10. This Order shall cease to apply on the 30th day of November 2020 unless extended by the Minister for such further period as may be specified.

    11. The Public Health (Covid-19 Control and Suppression Measures) (No. 8) Order, 2020 is revoked.

    Made by the Minister this 21st day of October, 2020.

  • Dictator (28/10/2020, 06:54) Like (4) Dislike (0) Reply
    this is either remarkably disingenuous or you really don't have enough of an idea about the BVI to be fit for office
  • Norris Turnbull (28/10/2020, 11:38) Like (1) Dislike (0) Reply
    Borders been porous from creation. Covid my backside.
  • Really? (28/10/2020, 12:25) Like (0) Dislike (0) Reply
    Seriously!?! "The discovery of the breach resulted in the channelling of resources to beef up border security... " You mean like calling upon the services of the Royal Navy?
  • porous indeed (28/10/2020, 18:07) Like (2) Dislike (0) Reply
    That's why the Royal Navy is needed. We need to feel safe.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.