Got TIPS or BREAKING NEWS? Please call 1-284-442-8000 direct/can also WhatsApp same number or Email ALL news to:newsvino@outlook.com;                               ads call 1-284-440-6666

Case for Osrick DaSilva & Antonio J. Caines dismissed

- Time soon come to retrieved seized cash
Osrick DaSilva, right & Antonio J. Caines, left, failing to declare case dismissed. Photo: VINO
Back in August of 2013, in an operation initiated by Customs, officers boarded and searched the cargo vessel Elitta 1 docked at Port Purcell. An envelope containing $90,000 and a paper bag containing $8,700 were found in one of the cabins. Photo: Shipspotting.com
Back in August of 2013, in an operation initiated by Customs, officers boarded and searched the cargo vessel Elitta 1 docked at Port Purcell. An envelope containing $90,000 and a paper bag containing $8,700 were found in one of the cabins. Photo: Shipspotting.com
PROSPECT REEF, Tortola, VI - The two men, Osrick DaSilva and Antonio Joseph Caines, who were held for failing to declare a large sum of monies on August 16, 2013 had the case against them dismissed yesterday October 30, 2014 by Magistrate Dr Velon L. John when they appeared for decision at the Prospect Reef Magistrate’s Court.

Back in August of 2013, in an operation initiated by Customs, officers boarded and searched the cargo vessel Elitta 1 docked at Port Purcell. An envelope containing $90,000 and a paper bag containing $8,700 were found in one of the cabins.

A joint investigation followed between Customs Officers and Officers of the Royal Virgin Islands Police Force (RVIPF) Special Investigations Unit which resulted in the arrest of Antonio J. Caines, 34 at the time, of Duff’s Bottom and Osrick DaSilva, 37 at that time, a native of St. Vincent, residing in Belmont, who was a crew member of the Elitta 1. An additional $1,594 was found in DaSilva’s possession.

The following day, both were charged with failure to declare monies to customs which is contrary to section 87 (4) of the Customs Management and Duties Act 2010.

When they appeared yesterday before Magistrate Dr John he pointed out in immigration laws the period a vessel was required to declare or clear customs while at any dock in the Territory. He noted that the Crown failed to give evidence of the time the vessel had spent at the Virgin Gorda Dock.

The Magistrate did agree that he both men knew the packages contained money and that Caines was familiar with customs procedures nonetheless the general circumstances surrounding the case including the evident of both sides he dismissed the case against the men.

While the two men breathed a sigh of relief and walked out of the dock as free men their attorney Mr Richard G. Rowe indicated to the Magistrate, “I will be making application in due course in relations to the money.”

In the early stages of the case as it was before the Magistrate’s Court when they were initially placed before Senior Magistrate Tamia Richards, Caines was placed on $80,000 and was required to surrender his passport to the RVIPF and DaSilva was remanded to prison.

Shortly after assuming the position of sitting Magistrate in the Virgin Islands Magistrate's Court Dr John had granted DaSilva bail to the sum of $80,000 for which he was required to have two qualified sureties at the request of his lawyer.

The court had heard that it would have been totally an injustice to have DaSilva remain incarcerated until the re-commencement of the trial which was at the time scheduled for January 28-29, 2014. This was based on the fact that the penalty for jail time, if found guilty, would be much less than the time of six months that he would have spent prior to the re-commencement of the trial.

Considering that the accused was likely to return to his job as a seaman, he was allowed to continue to be in possession of his passport but is required to report to the RVIPF every time the vessel he works on docks in the Virgin Islands (VI).

The Magistrate had also noted that it was in the goodwill of the Christmas spirit that the man should be allowed to spend the season with his family, which includes a new born baby he has not yet been allowed to see.

Caines, on the other hand, was granted the request to retrieve his passport from the RVIPF for the period of December 17 – 30, 2013 to allow him to travel to St Kitts to visit his grandmother.

Today that is all history as they both are now free of any criminal record and free to continue their activities of daily living but not forgetting the other step of retrieving the monies seized.

 

6 Responses to “Case for Osrick DaSilva & Antonio J. Caines dismissed”

  • ... (31/10/2014, 08:44) Like (8) Dislike (1) Reply
    justice came!
  • Yes (31/10/2014, 09:12) Like (2) Dislike (11) Reply

    V...n "case dismissed" J..n

  • chad (31/10/2014, 09:43) Like (3) Dislike (6) Reply
    Velon leaving a mark before he's gone in a few weeks.
  • trrefdrfds (31/10/2014, 10:49) Like (7) Dislike (6) Reply
    I hope everyone realises that all these cases were all started by another magistrate and that Dr. John is just cleaning up or fixing the mess that was made.. Just saying..
    • Idiot !!!! (31/10/2014, 13:13) Like (7) Dislike (5) Reply
      Shut your dumb A$$. The other magistrate did not bring charges to these offenders. The charges were brought by the AG's office. Furthermore, a crime is a crime, is a crime and we need to stop expecting that because we know someone that person should go free regardless the cirumstances. Should we then just not have laws and everyone do as they like? I feel that the sentencing for this entire week by Magistrate John were all rediculous and merely a free pass for all the offenders. The fines can't even cover the cost that the court wasted on any of those matters. Those fines will in no way discourage any of those individuals from being future offenders. Its a pity the original magistrate was not the one to complete each of those cases.
    • Hush (01/11/2014, 06:11) Like (2) Dislike (2) Reply
      Ur @$$.


Create a comment


Create a comment

Disclaimer: Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) welcomes your thoughts, feedback, views, bloggs and opinions. However, by posting a blogg you are agreeing to post comments or bloggs that are relevant to the topic, and that are not defamatory, liable, obscene, racist, abusive, sexist, anti-Semitic, threatening, hateful or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be excluded permanently from making contributions. Please view our declaimer above this article. We thank you in advance for complying with VINO's policy.

Follow Us On

Disclaimer: All comments posted on Virgin Islands News Online (VINO) are the sole views and opinions of the commentators and or bloggers and do not in anyway represent the views and opinions of the Board of Directors, Management and Staff of Virgin Islands News Online and its parent company.